Rossi Blog Reader
This website tracks recent postings to Andrea Rossi's
Journal of Nuclear Physics,
sorting the entries with priority to Rossi's answers, which appear under each question.
• Email to Andrea Rossi - Journal Of Nuclear Physics
• Website comments to the Webmaster (who has no contact or connection with Rossi).
• Updated: 2019-11-22 15:20:07.087891Z
Dear Andrea,
Will Saturday be the decisive day in this round of R&D?
Wishing you the success you seek,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
If positive, yes, if negative we will have to continue the experiment and understand where are the errors.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
dear Dr. Rossi,
I recently intervened little in this blog, but I never stopped following you and your work from the beginning.
I wish you and your team a big good luck!
Eugenio
Eugenio Mieli:
Thank you for your attention to the work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea in bocca al lupo. Un unico appunto se anziché un vino francese stappa un buon prosecco. Se mi dial’indizzo te ne spedisco una cassa. Con affetto. Gianvico PS: il prosecco buono sarebbe da scaraffare.
Gianvico:
He,he,he…thank you ! But we still are not there…close, but not there: these two days, I mean today, that is beginning now, and tomorrow, will be crucial, because if the experiment we are going to do now could be final. Potentially, but not yet actually.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andra Rossi
One question please, this year will you deliver your products to France ?
Warm Regards,
Toussaint François
Toussaint Francois:
Yes: fingers crossed,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Doct. Rossi,
if cigar time really comes, would it be possible to share day/time in your blog in advance, for all your followers, to share this celebration with you ?
Andrea Barberi
Andrea Barberi:
OK, granted, of course this is contingent with success.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I wish you a great success for Saturday!
Fingers crossed!
Warm Regard
Toussaint François
Dr Irina and Vitaly Uzikov,
I continue to be honoured from your attention to the work of our Team.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Back on July 15, 2019 you said you thought it would be possible to reach 90% electricity and 10% heat. That continues to be one of the most momentous possibilities I have ever read about. Based on your present, greater knowledge, do you still believe that goal is possible?
Thanks,
WaltC
——–
Andrea Rossi
July 15, 2019 at 2:44 PM
Victor:
We should be able to reach 90% electricity, 10% heat if this will be the demand. Still fighting, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
——–
WaltC:
I still am convinced we can do it.
This week has been historic for us, tomorrow and Saturday we will perhaps be able to get the success we are fighting for.
We are very close to an achievement that will change the global situation for what concerns the climate. Maybe we will fail, though.
Other two days of hard fight, then we will see where we are.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
The most sincere congratulations to you and your team with outstanding success!
Warmest regards,
Vitaliy and Irina Uzikovs
Dear Andrea:
Which publication of Prof Francesco Celani can you suggest ?
Prof
Prof:
Presently I am studying this:
https://www.amazon.com/maxwell-dirac-theory-occams-razor-interactions/dp/9529420927
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I have been waiting the coming moment since 5 years.
For that my friends use to call me “cold-fusion”.
Hope the time has finally come and the world could know about this revolutionary discovery.
Thanks for all your efforts.
Enrico
Dear Andrea,
Hope all is going well, you may soon have an operating proof of concept device, a device that can recover electricity from nuclear processes will be a technological marvel, even if only working for short periods of time.
Not only is this device a very, very significant development on its own, you will now have a proof of concept device to support your theoretical knowledge of the underlying nuclear processes, this confirmation of the nuclear theory will be the step required to allow the E-Cat SK to move forward.
You are likely near to being in a position for a public launch of the E-Cat SK for supply of heat, however before any public launch you will have to educate the mainstream scientific establishment that the underlying nuclear processes involved are understood, are quantifiable and can be controlled in a failsafe method. Your proof of concept SSM device will be the tool to educate and demonstrate proof of actual not just theoretical nuclear processes.
It is unlikely that any government will allow the placing on the market a device or a service depending on a device based on nuclear processes, where the basis of the device is a scientific black box with unknown contents.
Any attempts of placing an unknown nuclear device on the market will quickly lead to accusations regarding safety, likely followed by legal action, legal bodies will of course refer to the mainstream scientific establishment, the scientists will say that if it is nuclear it will be potentially dangerous, and that the equipment should be seized and handed over to them for study, therefore the need to educate the scientific establishment before any launch.
Revealing your technology to the scientific establishment will of course be a shock to them, there will be many with entrenched views, there will be a lot of resistance, but the sooner this education process is started the faster you can move forward.
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
Glory Day for the Team of Andrea Rossi !
Angstrom
Uppsala:
With the help of God, this week we could have the searched success,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I answered !
I answered that I prefer answer after the R&D will have been completed, but I answered to both with one comment on the same day.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Is there a special reason that my comment on Nov 20 (at 1:44 AM, 1:48 AM and 1:55 AM)
were published without any answer from you?
Do I need to repeat it again?
Kind regards
Sven B
Caro Dr. Rossi anche il Prof. Francesco Celani è fiducioso del vostro lavoro e lo ha ribadito durante una conferenza sull’energia.
Dal min.50 il riferimento a Lei. Saluti.
ENGLISH:
Dear Dr Rossi,
also Prof. Francesco Celani has trust in the work of your Team and he repeated this fact during the conference about energy hereunder linked: from min 50 he talks about your work:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxt72t3g_NQ
Vincenzo Bonomo:
Thank you for this encouraging information.
Prof Francesco Celani is making an excellent work in the field of the ZBW and I am reading his papers. Also his experiments are very interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi and thanks for Your answer.
Although You changed my original content ( which I really do not know, why You should do this ) , the answer will do for now.
Gabriel C.:
Sorry for that, but your comment had gone in the spam. I always take a rapid look to the initial spam pages ( do not have time to look at all spams, we receive a lot of them ) and if a comment is good I recover it. In your case- sometimes happens- the spam recovered gets lost, mainly for my fault, since I have not much time available and make some wrong click. In these cases I try to remember what I read and rewrite the core of it. I think I conserved the core meaning of what you wanted to say.
Now, thanks to this comment of you, I have completed the “recovered” comment with your complete name and email address.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
While it is difficult to type with my fingers crossed, I fiercely pushed them for another question:
You seem to have some direct electrical production of the reactor going on, but do you also have it connected to your control system enabling the testing of SSM in real practice?
All the success for these exciting days!
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
Gerard McEk:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Caro Andrea,
finalmente sei arrivato alla meta !!! Ti ringrazio con tutto il cuore per aver dato un futuro ai miei figli e a tutta l’umanità, che è ancora ignara ma presto si unirà al mio ringraziamento. Se non mi scoppia il cuore dalla gioia per questo momento storico è solo perchè in fondo l’ho sempre saputo che ce l’avresti fatta. Davvero. Mai avuto un dubbio. Ti seguo da anni e ho semnpre pregato perchè questo momento avvenisse. Bravo. Ma non voglio farti perdere altro tempo prezioso.
Se vuoi e puoi rispondere a queste mie curiosità:
1 – Dopo la conferma definitiva del funzionamento, cosa farai ? (non vale rispondere “Wait. No cigar yet”)
2 – La quantità di elettricità prodotta è limitata, e quindi solo sufficente al SSM e poco altro, oppure è abbastanza copiosa, tanto che potremo utilizzare l’ECAT come generatore doppio Calore+Elettricità ?
Un abbraccio e che Dio ti benedica
Marco Serra
English: ——-
Dear Andrea
You got it. You reached this huge goal. Thank you from my children and from the whole mankind that soon will know you and thank you on their own. I’m so happy. I’ve always known you were the man. Never doubt you would end in a success. I’ve always prayed that you succeded. But stop wasting your precious time.
Please answer to my curiosity, if you want:
1 – After the ulimate confirmation of the 100% SSM, what will be your next move ? (Please don’t answer “Wait. No cigar yet”)
2 – Is the electric energy produced by the ECAT just enough to achieve SSM or is it in copious quantity so that users can exploit it for practical uses ?
God bless you
Marco Serra
Marco Serra:
1- No champagne yet ( pardon: we will present a product that has the potential to save the planet, if it is true that the climate change is caused by fossil fuels ).
2- it should be in good excess.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
In my engineering days, so long ago now, my rule was to perform replication 10 times in a row successfully before I declared to Management that I had discovered something of note.
Sounds like you and your team are doing well. My acclamations and admiration to an excellent team.
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for your sustain to the excellent work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Power Engineering issue of Novenber 21 2019:
How to keep your Li-ion based energy storage project from catching fire.
Rod Walton
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
you wrote:
“It is unbelievable, but if we succeed we will save the planet. Period. As of today we made enormous progress and I think we are very close to success. If we will not have success, this would mean that I have wasted a lot of personal money, because I wanted not anybody lose money investing in this very risky enterprise”.
I am quite surprised you still have doubts about the success of the ECAT, because you said us that you are selling (steam produced by) ECAT plants that already produce clean energy. Why then these douts? Do the ECAT plants you are selling really work?
Best regards, Bruno
Bruno:
We must make a distinction between the sale of heat derived by the production of the Ecat SK and the permanent SSM generation of electricity and heat made by the R&D on course.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
I wish you good results for this weekend and that you will announce that Santa Claus has gone to the laboratory.
I chilled a bottle of Ruinart that I find better than Don Pérignon.
All my encouragement to the entire research team.
Best regards
Raffaele
Raffaele Bongo:
Thank you for your kind sustain: fingers crossed, today we replicated the result of yesterday, so far so very good,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Can you tell us how are going on the certifications for the industrial and the domestic QuarkX?
Thank you,
Gabriel
Gabriel:
I am sorry, but I did not make any reference toFeynmann in my paper, but, nevertheless, we all are strongly indebted to him.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
I investigated your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and discovered that in par 3 and 4 you have cited the work of Feynmann: how important has been him for your R&D?
Gabriel C.
Dear Andrea,
I know the goal is SSM, but are you also testing your new apparatus adapted for external energy input, and if so, is the performance satisfactory?
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Mr. Rossi,
from your posts i infer, that your lab is in comfy Florida.
Wouldn’t it rise the ‘urgency’, if you’d move your work-place to – lets say – snowy Illinois?
The need to provide stable useful cheap heat would motivate you and your team – agreed?
Greetings
DvH
DvH:
We use thermometers, not wet fingers, to measure temperatures…the results are the same, in an R&D context, wherever you go.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
1.You have advertising for E-Cat SK on E-Catworld but not on your official site ecat.com.
2.The information about your offerings is not up to date on ecat.com.
Could you explain why?
Best regards
Sven
Sven:
To both these questions I prefer to answer after the R&D phase will have been completed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jag Bara Undrar:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Many of us are just as excited about the developments on the Ecat SK as you are and we all hope you will succeed.
However I was wondering why you said that it would ‘save the world’.
I would think that if you make an energy generator putting out a lot more energy than putting it in, and that you already put on the market in January 2019, would have been just as revolutionary.
Can you you explain this?
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
Gerard McEk:
It was revolutionary, but this could be universal in relation to save the planet. If it will work.
Warm regards,
A.R.
On Power Engineering issue of today:
Mouser carries 3 phase automotive gate driver unit
Rod Walton
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
My memory is good. November 19 and 20, 2009 you meet DOE and DOD. Now exactly these dates 10 years later you write about your big breakthrough .. Congratulations
Dear Andrea Rossi,
For some reason, the 3 last lines of my comment keep beeing modified&dropped at posting.
Here they are in separate:
2: less than 25%
3: 25-50%
4: more than 50%
Kind regards
Sven B
Corrected reply:
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The new information, just confirmed by you, that Ecat-SKL-modules now also can be put
in series I find quite sensational. It suggests to me there will be a new output contact added to the existing Ecat-SK design.
A DC contact with a fixed voltage and a maximal current rating. As before the heat outputs can only
be put in parallel.
1: Are my conclusions more correct than wrong?
The modified output will only be justified when the available electrical power can be a large enough part of the total power. What is now your first goal?
2: 50%
Kind regards
Sven B
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The new information, just confirmed by you, that Ecat-SKL-modules now also can be put
in series I find quite sensational. It suggests to me there will be a new output contact added to the existing Ecat-SK design.
A DC contact with a fixed voltage and a maximal current rating. As before the heat outputs can only
be put in parallel.
1: Are my conclusions more correct than wrong?
The modified output will only be justified when the available electrical power can be a large enough part of the total power. What is now your first goal?
2: 50%
Kind regards
Sven B
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Can you tell us something about the eCat SK Leonardo test reactor in terms of output power, W? kW. MW?
Steven N. Karels:
If our modular prototype will do what we expect, putting modules in series and parallels you can reach any power you want.
The point is: we are making an apparatus that produces electric energy and heat, in excess respect the electric energy that it consumes, so that it takes from itself all the electric energy necessary to work. It is unbelievable, but if we succeed we will save the planet. Period. As of today we made enormous progress and I think we are very close to success. If we will not have success, this would mean that I have wasted a lot of personal money, because I wanted not anybody lose money investing in this very risky enterprise.
We are close, but not yet there.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Can you say anything more about recent activities in your R&D program? And how is your team feeling about what is going on?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
The work of our team is proceeding vrery well and it is not impossible that by the end of this week we reach our goal. We are very advanced.I am here, in the lab, working with my Team.We all hope that by the end of this week we will uncork a bottle of Dom Perignon. I think that if it will not be the end of this week it will not be far. We made enormous progress during these last 10 days.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Irina and Vitaly Uzikov:
I am honoured of this citation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
This is a link to an article about
a new material.
https://phys.org/news/2019-11-material-world-electricity.html
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Thank you for the information,
Warm regards,
A.R.
@A Friend,
This process has highly compact fuel, it is not overunity
Dear Andrea!
Today I learned that back in 2014, at the Ural University, where I was studying, the textbook “Hydrogen in Power Engineering” was published, where on pages 104-107 a description of your reactor is given. With great pleasure I am sending you an electronic version of this book and I was happy that it was at my university that your breakthrough technology in energy was appreciated.
Warmest regards,
Vitaliy and Irina Uzikov
On Power Engineering issue of November 19-19:
A-Z: from Archive to Zydeco at #Powergen 19
Rod Walton
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Sincerely, I think that your quest for the permanent SSM violates the unity, therefore I believe that you are sincerely making an R&D convinced that you will succeed, also because you are spending your money and totally dedicating your lifetime to this, but my belief is that you will never succeed. I am sincerely worried for your devastating efforts to reach what nobody can reach. Rest with this useful endeavor and enjoy your life: life is beautiful, but short.
The sole important work that is in progress is what Exxon Mobil is doing with the algae.
All the best,
A Friend
A Friend:
Perhaps for a Freudian lapsus you wrote “useful endeavor”.
He,he,he,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
thank you for the information you gave us with your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
I studied it and confronted the text with the view of
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
and I learnt a treasury of information. After this, I am trying to replicate your effect.
Thank you,
Stevie
Stevie Golemba:
Thank you for your kind attention to the work of our Team,
Good luck for the replications,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@JPR,
The reason of the stunning success of the paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
stays in the fact that it is composed by three components: theoretical ground, experimental coherent success, and the demo of the experiment here:
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
These three component have made thousands of scientists of the whole world read the paper and view the video: note that the numbers coincide.
All the best,
Gavin
Hi Andrea,
did you already find the track of opposite 511 keV emission?
511k regards
Alessandro Coppi
Alessandro Coppi:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Can you describe, at this time, the longest SSM time for the eCat SK Leonardo achieved? Seconds, minutes, hours?
Steven N. Karels:
No, I prefer to wait the conclusion of this R&D and give the final result.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@JPR,
I agree with you. Also we must consider that the 230 recommendations have been made by researchers amd professors that have publicly signed them and all of them are listed on Researchgate as researchers and prof of scientific matters, many of them specialists in nuclear physics, so that it is the most peer reviewed paper of its specific field.
Cheers
Prof
Dear Andrea.
yout paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is actually viral: ASs of today reached 32651 full readings and more than 230 recommendations, it is progressing at an average of over 100 full readings per day, from all the world. Unbelievable.
Any progress about the publication derived from your experiment on course ?
All the best,
Jean Paul
JPR:
I still am stunned about the attention dedicated to this theoretical-experimental publication.
About the theoretical progress: yes, we are finding experimental confirmations of all the theoretical hypothesis made in the paper. Some theories have been confirmed experimentally for the first time in the world. Our Team is making an outstanding job.
Our work is proceeding better than expected.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@ Consciousness:
If he would open his tech to the world, then the wildfire would start burning and anyone could continue to develop it in parallel to finally spolve the latest issues with the ecat’s.
This would be a major improvement, and perhaps we already would have had a working machine.
This is necessary to finally stop the climate change. But as long Rossi does not open his science to others, no one will ever believe in him and/or take him seriously.
Ulrich W.A. Kranz:
An e-car may be equipped with a minimal battery and in addition a Carnot cycle-based engine, able to continuously generate electricity of 12 to 15 kWh/h to support the battery. The engine will also produce at least 24 to 30 kWh/h, normally wasted or useless, heat.
When parked at home, the generator will deliver power to the grid. (Money is earned instead of payed. The same may be done at your job.) No worry for grid overload!
The double amount of free energy may also, by help of “Water-hose quick-couplings” be supplied to the owner’s house. Only an extra heat exchanger in the car is needed.
This will supply the home with additional energy by hot water of 80 deg C to heat: the house, a swimming pool, a greenhouse or an absorption chiller to provide AC, when needed.
If the Carnot cycle-based engine receives its energy from a steam producing E-Cat, this whole energy supply may happen without any known pollution or bothersome noise.
Whether the E-Cat is operating in ssm or not, seems in this situation of minor importance. The extended use of an environmentally friendly energy source is of great importance.
Obtainable thermal energy may also be environmentally stored at the mansion in a hot water tank and/or an ice-water tank, for use while the car is on the road.
If an E-Cat, with a 36-kW capacity, in the future, may be able to produce 33 % of its energy directly as electricity and the rest as heat, the same will be possible without the Carnot cycle-based engine in this energy supply.
The described advantageous property of the E-Cat to produce energy, on spot, independent of sun, wind, wires, pipes, heavy and large volumes hydrocarbons to be transported, makes it to a winner in addition to its directly environmentally friendly use, when or if it emerges on the marked.
Regards: Svein Henrik.
@Eric Ashworth:
You are right, language is a strange subject indeed.
For instance myself I read “..specialist will take care of ..”
as “..specialist in publicity will take care of ..”
Regards
Sven B
Conscience,
Your condescending attitude is both rude and obnoxious. Your assumption is that if someone “opens up their technology”, the world will rush in to greet it. Experience paints a different picture. Monetary interests threatened by the improvement will rush to crush it. Government leaders will rush to control it. Military people will rush to weaponize it.
If the eCat technology is a fraud, then it will never be commercially used. Since it appears to be commercially used, we can infer that it is unlikely a fraud.
If all the “secrets” were released but the performance could not be independently duplicated (as in Cold Fusion), then the technology will be ridiculed and valid research stopped or stymied. Leave AR along to do his thing and wish him the best if you truly care about the world.
Svein Henrik,
I now understand what you are saying. Giving the Carnot efficiency of less than 40% for Sterling or small turbine generators, you will need an eCat with the thermal output of about 30kW to meet the 12 kWhr/hr electrical demand. Yes, the battery size required on the car can be reduced but you still have a significant cooling issue. Not a problem if the vehicle is in motion (air convection). But it could be an issue if the vehicle is parked.
Plus you will need to provide a unit that is crash-resistant. The more probable immediate application of current eCat technology will be in Carnot cycle electricity generation and normal distribution of the electrical energy to users.
Perhaps that is why AR is so intent on the eCat SK Leonardo (direct electricity production)?
In the US, the typical driving speed is around 75 mph. 130kph I believe? So your assumed electrical output capacity would need to support this energy demand rate.
Hello Andrea,
In Germany there is the worry that the grid could be overloaded when should a massive amount of e-cars be charged, while there are discussions about the proposal from Elon Musk to build a bif e-car factory near berlin: do you think the Ecat SK Leonardo in permanent SSM will help?
Ulrich
Ulrich W.A. Kranz:
If we succeed to make a permanent SSM (electric), which means that the ratio electricity generated/electricity consumed has a zero at the denominator, the issue is over.
We are at work.
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, Language is a strange subject, for instance Frank Ackland asked would you be willing to invite some reliable third parties to witness it in action and report their findings?. Your reply “Of course”. Buck asked, given the importance of s.s.m would you consider the Wall Street Journal etc. etc. as examples of reliable third parties worthy of an invitation?. Andrea, although your answer, is correct, I do not think that Buck or many academics will fully understand the message contained within your answer regarding a specialist or specialists rather than that of a witness. Regards Eric Ashworth
Eric Ashworth:
We’ll see.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Find here a boat ready for the Ecat: google “Outboard-Deep Blue 25 RL Torqeedo”
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
Chuck Davis:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear readers,
Please find on
http://www.rossilivecat.com
the comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
you have previously shared your view on the pivotal nature of permanent SSM, and the evolution from just the Ecat SK to including the Ecat SK Leonardo as offered products/services.
Now, you indicate to Frank Acland your willingness to invite and demonstrate the Ecat SK Leonardo in action to reliable third parties if SSM is achieved and you are satisfied with the reliability of device.
Given the importance of permanent SSM, would you consider The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The International Herald Tribune as examples of reliable third parties worthy of an invitation?
Sincerely and Respectfully,
Buck
Buck:
There will be a specialist that will take care of this aspect.
Thank you for your suggeston,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Why are you so hell-bent on secrecy and not wanting to open up your science to the world?
Your technology could be saving the world yesterday instead of tomorrow.
Is that why you really work hard and long hours, because you feel guilty for this?
Because you know, if you opened up your research and technology to the rest of the world, it would spread like wildfire fire. Other experts would optimise it and port it to other industries much quicker than you could ever by yourself with your team.
If you open the technology to the world, you become an immortal hero, and then you become ultra rich any way. And the quicker your technology diffuses, the longer you can enjoy it grow throughout your lifetime.
You could work 5am to 1am every day, but you will never be as fast as a whole scientific, engineering and business community.
Your answer to my last question was “because it is not ready”. But you keep seeking perfection, and every time that you achieve it, you then move the goal posts to seek a different perfection. Your pattern is now clear. And I am sure that after you figure out the Leonardo, you will come up with the next thing you want to perfect.
Why don’t you open up your research and technology now?
Regards,
Conscience
Conscience:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels
An ordinary electric car, today, has a battery of 55kWh. This gives a mileage of 400 km. At an average speed of 80km/h, the battery will be empty after 5 hours. This gives an average energy consumption of 11kWh/h. With a Sterling engine or other, given energy from a E-Cat, that delivers 12kWh or a little more to the electric engine, you after 5 hours of driving, will still have a full battery.
The battery size, therefore may be reduced to 1/10th of today’s need. The battery should only provide acceleration periods and be able to absorb braking energy. This car will also be so much lighter that its energy consumption is reduced.
This car also allows you to connect it to your home and supply it with energy, when the car is not on the road. When the car is in use, your home gets energy from the grid. There, possibly, your neighbor’s car is connected, so he can supply your house and vice versa. Similar condition otherwise in the energy use, you probably see yourself.
Yours, Svein Henrik
Dear Andrea,
If SSM is achieved and you are satisfied with the reliability of device, would you be willing to invite some reliable third parties to witness it in action and report their findings?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Of course.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Svein Henrik,
I am uncertain of your reasoning. Using eCat technology to generate heat and then electricity (through the Carnot cycle) will have no effect on the reduction of demand for battery materials. If adopted widely, it will likely increase the demand as electricity rates/costs drop. Electrical energy will still need to be stored (in batteries) for transportation purposes as a Carnot cycle-based transportation engine is less desirable than a high efficiency direct electricity variant because of the heat dissipation requirements. Please clarify your reasoning.
Steven N. Charles
Through the production of electricity through the Carnot cycle, E-Cat will significantly reduce the need for batteries. This will prevent the global shortage of cobalt, lithium and nickel from occurring.
Regards: Svein Henrik
Svein Henrik:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If you can achieve a very high SSM and a high efficiency energy conversion to electricity, the applications are many:
a. aviation
b. land vehicles (cars and trucks)
c. marine propulsion
d. space propulsion and providing energy
all without dangerous radiation or by products.
Steven N. Karels:
Correct.
Warm regards,
A.R.
Chuck Davis and Andrea Rossi
I had the same problem but
needed a break from JONP.
All good now.
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Very well.
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
If you will do ssm e cat sk, there will be no need for grid! ust a battery for the start.
All energy companies distributing energy by the grid will non be happy. Be careful Andrea.
Calabrian regards
domenico canino
Domenico Canino:
Thank you for your concern and attention to the work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If you are selling the current technology, then you cannot reasonably be accused by Conscience of “refusing to let it out”. If the eCat SK Leonardo variant should never work, will you suddenly abandon the current product? I would think not.
If you can achieve infinite SSM and directly produce electricity, that will be an amazing deed. But should you fail in that one product, the potential of the current product to change mankind for the better will not be diminished.
The major environmental advantage I see for the eCat SK Leonardo is reduced thermal pollution by the elimination in the Carnot cycle in generating electricity. Are there other advantages to the eCat SK Leonardo that we are not aware of? If so, please educate us.
Steven N. Karels:
I agree.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Are you still taking orders for your older eCat systems – reference Conscience’s comment? If so, then you have placed your product in the “stream of commerce”. If not, can you explain why?
Steven N. Karels:
We still are taking orders for the heat, but Conscience , I suppose, was referring to the Ecat SK Leonardo.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I hope you are very busy in your lab and not sick, because it is not of you to miss an entire day in the blog of the JoNP !
Warm Regards,
Chuck davis
Chuck Davis:
Thank you for your concern, but as far as I know today this blog has regularly published comments from the Readers !
Maybe your server had some malfunction for some time today ? Did some other reader have difficulties ?
Please let me know, because I had no feeling about malfunctions from our side.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi
A troll has written that many of the Prof and researchers that have recommended your paper on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
are not physicists, but biologists etc. It seems to me that this idiot forgot that your paper has so far more than 230 recommendations, among which at least half of them work in matters related and the others are anyway engaged in scientific matters, and we talk of hundreds of researchers and Professors, while in any scientific magazine the peer reviewers are normally one, sometimes two !
As you said, the mother of the imbeciles is always pregnant.
All the best,
Claretha
Claretha Kellow:
I do not listen rock and troll. No time for it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr Rossi.
Your technology, if real, would start saving countless lives as soon as it is deployed.
Pollution kills millions.
Wars fought over energy resources kill millions too.
And climate change has only just started its killing spree.
You are a man of God. God would want you to give your invention to the world today before tomorrow so the world can use it, reproduce it and make it better.
It’s extremely pretentious to think that only you and your small team are capable of making it better.
1. What are you asking God and man in exchange for this? Because you would definitely get all the glory. And also all the money.
2. Yet you refuse to let it out. Why?
Regards,
Conscience
Conscience:
Because it is not ready.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You said the temperature of the QuarkX reaches 2700 Celsius degrees: at this temperature you should have big problems for the heat conduction along the conductors, am I correct?
Anomymous:
Much less than the ITER and without any fund from the taxpayers,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I understood from your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and watching
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
that you take advantage of the current that is added from the plasma to the current initially used to innext the arc.
Cheers
Ron
Ron:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
How much costed to you the R&D you are making to get the permanent SSM ?
Dear Andrea, Here I go again but only because I have read your reply to Karl-Henrik Malmqvist Nov. 12th. I am not surprised at what you have done but I can assure you, you are making a huge mistake that should you pursue in this present activity, will result in disaster. I have no reason to derail your objective. I too am an independent researcher with an accepted embodied technology referred to as one before its time.
The difficulties I have encountered are many due to what I have discovered as an active force with its sole purpose to suppress the understanding of energy. I am know writing direct onto your JONP because twice, information intended for the JONP has been removed from my computer. Frustrating but I realize it is because I have something that they do not want me to share. This is why your JONP is of such value in its philosophy regarding democracy that allows for uncensored published information. What you and myself are involved in is a game that every planet has to play and win, if it wants to break through the final frontier in physics, referred by me as the holy grail of physics.
This for you and myself is an extremely serious subject with huge ramifications. What I suggest you do is say to yourself, if you were in another persons position who wanted to keep a secret (there again maybe nobody wants to) what would you do? i.e. how would you go about to ensure it remained a well kept secret. It’s really quite simple, think about the environment you would be operating within. The present environment operates within a peer reviewing protocol process so as to control and promote emerging ideas within research communities. Independent researchers are not peer reviewed. Basically we are considered renegades/wild cards and pose a serious problem, so what else would you do?. I would start a useless program such as ITER, funded of course by a money pit called the tax payer. This would fool most people but not everyone but what about the independent researcher. Well if you think of the money spent on the ITER project, all that you would need to spend so as to slow down the independent researcher would be the equivalent of thirty pieces of silver.
What you have Andrea is what you set out to do and you have succeeded. I realize the importance of the SSM but why destroy that which is almost perfect?. I strongly advise you not to go down a blind alley. My Unifying Field Oscillation (UFO) aircraft requires energy but not that of oil – coal – gas or conventional nuclear power but that which you have developed so as to be independent when the independence is required. When I first stumbled upon your web site and technology I knew immediately that this was the energy required but before this I knew Pi=4 because it’s relevant to the 4th Aspect being that which connects Alpha energy to Omega energy i.e. the process you are seeking to obtain the SSM and the independence it will provide. I am not an academic and this I believe is why I know, what I know. I intend to keep the communication but should it fail it will not be because of me but by outside interference.
It must also be realized that before a person does something he must first have a good idea of why he is doing it, especially when it is novel. In other words he must be able to understand the principle and the reason behind the principle so as not to waste time and money chasing effects rather than the understanding of the causes. In other words, if the principle could be explained and it made perfect sense would you pursue observed effects and speculate as to their causes.
Regards Eric Ashworth
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Which Country are you working in during this period of R&D related to the Ecat SK Leonardo to reach the permanent SSM?
Anonymous:
USA
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
It would be rather pointless to reveal their address, because I can’t dance.
Nevertheless, their rejection is a bit of an insult.
If they don’t want to be addressed, let them dance around the clock!
Sooner or later, artificial neural networks will unravel all the tricks of the ballerinas, and entire ballet operas and concerts can be written for them.
In the meantime, take care of your own neural network.
To be honest, I am really surprised that you are now starting a new generation. Let us hope that the SSM and the electricity production will be fine soon. What are the proportions that you expect between electricity and heat in percentages? Roughly.
Very kind regards,
Koen
Koen Vandewalle:
He,he,he…I passed it on to the ballerinas. They are sorry you felt insulted, but I said you are right: I know the feeling.
The proportion between electricity and heat: let me reserve this for when we will be ready, presently I am not even roughly to answer.
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
In response to your answer: without dreams you could not be where you are today,
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
Chuck Davis:
True.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
The southern half of the city has been on the internet. I had a break lasting more than 12 hours. (No TV, no phone, no web)
I ask the following question: Does the Industrial E-Cat continue to work in the event of a web outage or is it shut down?
I wish you every success in your quest for the autonomous E-Cat
Best regards
Raffaele
Raffaele Bongo,
If the Ecat works in a concern wherein is important the continuity in case of black out, it is important to have a back-up. By the way: the Ecat SK Leonardo in permanent SSM should not need external power sources ( if we will be successful with what we are doing ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I understood it well.
And it is quite erroreous.
For example….
“the quantum vacuum fluctuations predicted by
the Heisenberg uncertainty principle”
Since when does the UCP predict vacuum fluctoations ???
Prof12:
Clearly, you are not a Prof of Physics, as put in evidence from the stupidity you just wrote, and I have not the time to educate you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Prof12,
If you read carefully the paper of Dr Rossi,you will see that it treats the Coulombian forces in inr introduction and in par 1,2,3, while in the par 4 it is obviously implied. Your answer gives evidence that you either did not study the paper or you are not able to read it.
Regards,
Prof
Prof12:
Because you have understood nothing and, if it is true that you are a physicist, you clearly did not study my paper.
If you really studied it and understood nothing, I am sorry, but there is nothing I can do for you.
All I had to say about the Coulombian force related to my effect is written in the paper.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr Rossi,
Do you ever sleep?
So much things to do in so much small time!
With love,
Angstrom
Angstrom:
From midnight to 6 A.M. I sleep.Fortunately I am regular: at midnight I fall asleep because tired and at 6 AM I wake up because of the anxiety of results.
Thank you for your concern,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Prof
I am curious about the latest statistics of the publication
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
What are now the four figures and how does each of them compare with all other publications?
Kind regards
Sven B
Sven B:
As of today, my paper on Researchgate reached 31837 full readings and 230 recommendations from Prof and researchers of the whole world.
It is the most read and recommended paper of nuclear physics published in the last years. Note: the scientists that recommended the paper have published their recommendations, which makes of a recommendation a peer reviewing. This success was absolutely not expected.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi, Andrea.
You answered this:
Prof12:
Sorry, I confirm what I already answered. If you are a physicist, obviously you did not even read my paper, now that I am reading this answer of yours.
Never mind,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi and Team,
Now we are very curious again. What did you discover? That two or more ballerinas can perform choreographic arts or juggling tricks together that are not possible for a single ballerina?
In time we will be allowed to know for sure?
Kind Regards,
Koen
Koen Vandewalle:
Yes.
We asked ballerinas if we can give you their address, but they said “no, it is confidential”
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations with your progress!
Just a few questions:
1. Are you now aiming for generating mainly electricity with the E-cat Leonardo?
2. Do you believe that you will accomplish SSM this month (November)?
3. Now it seems that your theory and tests come more and more and more together and assuming your view on how it works is right: Do you think that our existing knowledge of elementary particles in the sense of how they are are built up, come into existence and interact, will need to change?
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
Gerard McEk:
1- We are aiming at what we are not able to do. This is R&D stays for
2- I do not know, it is not impossible, but it is difficult
3- I am not able to answer this question, but I think our experiments give evidence to the theoretical work of scientists that do not follow the mass, for example Hestenes ( see his references on my paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Has your focus shifted from generation of heat>generation of heat + electricity to generation of electricity + less or no heat ?
Regards,
Frederick Somerville
Frederick Somerville:
Now our focus is on production of electricity, but we are not abandoning the production of heat.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
From your comments, it sounds like an exciting day today at the lab. Have you achieved permanent self-sustain yet?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Not yet, but today we made another important step forward.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I am excited to see your progress toward the Ecat and can’t wait to power my house with itin California.
Also: imagine to power this kind of stuff with the Ecat:
http://www.yahoo.com/news/jetpack-aviation-raises-2m-build-143846308.html
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
Chuck Davis:
Thank you for your kind attention for our work, but I think the Flying Cat is just a dream…but…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Do soundwaves any effect on the plasma we watched on
http://www.ecatskdemo.com ? Good luck for the Electric Ecat !
Hermes Atar Trismegistus
Hermes Atar Trismegistus:
Soundwaves can affect some kinds of plasma. Not ours.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi, Andrea.
You asked:
Andrea Rossi
November 12, 2019 at 11:47 AM
Prof12:
Did you study it ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Now I studied it.
And I do not see, why You still refer to a coloumb barrier transition, if You admitted, that it is not fusion.
Prof12:
I do not think you studied it. At the most you read it.
It is well explained why it is important that the Coulombian forces are balanced and the reason is not nuclear fusion.
Par 1,2,3,4. More than this, I cannot say.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
1 Are you always measuring the radiations emitted from the Ecat SK Leonardo ?
2 Results?
Ronald Kinsler:
1- Always
2- Never happened that ionizing radiations have been emitted by any E-Cat
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Are you still selling heat?
Aleida Wollner:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Irina and Vitaly Uzikov:
Thank you for your concern: thanks to God, my health sustains perfectly my job. Looking for working together,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Regarding blockchain for your business model
I am not a professional so really cannot give a good advise for why it would be a huge step forward for your business model, except for the advise to consult a top nudge blockchain consultant who can explain the advantages much better then I will ever be able to do. I believe in regarding to data collection, smart contracts, efficiency, and security it will be of a great benefit.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/blockchain.asp
https://lisk.io/what-is-blockchain
https://www.smartdatacollective.com/top-advantages-blockchain-for-businesses/
https://www.cmswire.com/information-management/why-enterprises-are-looking-to-blockchain-for-better-data-privacy/
sometimes to find a big cheese just follow a mouse….but maybe I am just smelling something that’s not there
I am sorry I cannot be more specific.
Kind regards and success to you and your team
Arjen
Arjen:
Thank you for your suggestions and the links,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Good luck in your quest for electricity from SSM — but why go for the most difficult goal right away? Heat is very important and a vast market.
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Because since something better remains to be done, it’s like you did nothing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Caro Andrea,
io sono sicuro che tu non hai mai buttato via anni di lavoro e che neanche un minuto di tempo né un pezzetto di metallo è stato da te speso o sprecato invano.
Non è la prima volta che modifichi la tua strategia nell’affrontare il fenomeno LENR, come quando sei uscito dall’ospedale dopo l’operazione all’ernia e hai dato vita a “Ballerina”, una fantastica creatura!
Ora la tua nuova strategia è affrontare il fenomeno LRPI, quello che hai messo in evidenza con la tua avveniristica pubblicazione.
Io, anzi noi tutti, siamo vicini a te che stai affrontando questo ultimo passo, verso il più avvincente dei traguardi!
Enea
Dear Andrea,
I am sure that you have never thrown away years of work and that not even a minute of time or a piece of metal was spent by you or wasted in vain.
It is not the first time that you change your strategy in dealing with the LENR phenomenon, like when you left the hospital after the hernia operation and you gave birth to “Ballerina”, a fantastic creature!
Now your new strategy is to face the LRPI phenomenon, the one you highlighted with your futuristic publication http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
I, indeed all of us, are close to you that you are facing this last step, towards the most fascinating finish line!
Enea
Enea Romagnoli:
Thank you for your trust in our work.
I see what I can do to merit it
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
There is one aspect of usable energy supply that no one seems to be talking about. That is that the supply of fossil fuels no matter how large will be eventually depleted and in fact since its use is growing, perhaps sooner than expected. So, the debate about its effect on global warming may be immaterial. Nature has a tendency to move slowly so IMHO this probably will happen before any catastrophic events can occur. As fossil fuels become less available, devices such as yours will by necessity be developed into usable substitutes.
Future regards,
Eernie1:
I agree.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
“First step, second step”. You must have accomplished SSM and now in ‘second step’ – “electricity, electricity, electricity”. If so, congratulations on the epoch achievement!
Brokeeper
Brokeeper:
You cannot even imagine the work that is going on here today. We are very excited and working like beasts.
Thank you for your sustain, always,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
We are happy to know about the breakthrough successes in the theory and engineering of your fantastic source of energy. Only one request – be more attentive to your health, your over-stressed work should not negatively affect your health – it is too important for all of us!
Dear Andrea,
In order to achieve electrical production, are you just adding special components or are you also redesigning the Ballerina to get easier electrical extraction?
Best Regards,
Karl-Henrik
Karl-Henrik Malmqvist:
We redisigned the Ballerina you saw in
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
. We threw away years of work, made an internal revolution, but it was necessary to arrive where we have to arrive. Courage has been necessary, because we decided not to sit down and enjoy the remarkable results obtained making heat, but I think we are very close and getting closer by the day to our objective. Spent much money, wasted much materials, but it was necessary to make epoche’ on what had been done to arrive where we have to arrive. The pulse has been generated by our theoretical evolution or, better, revolution initiated with
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, The connection between your E-Cat achieving a self sustain mode and cancer is that both of these problems are directly connected to embodied energy. Your E-Cat has solid elements and hydrogen. Cancer is a soft cell becoming solid. It is overrunning a cellular cycle and becoming dense. This subject is to do with atomic structure. Your E-Cat has to get the energy out of embodied substance i.e. conversion/transition. Question how do you stop a cell from densifying i.e. running further than it should. If you can cure cancer or put the E-Cat into a self sustain mode you will realize the connection by the method. However, I do not profess to know everything so maybe there are many methods to overcome this related problem regarding energy/density. As an added piece of information I do not think the problems I sometimes have posting, certain information, on your site has anything to do with the JONP as I have encountered many problems before and no doubt will continue with regards specific information, that certain individuals consider not to be shared. I am use to it. Computers when deemed necessary can be like open books and able to be peer revued. This is nothing to dwell on as I am aware you are extremely busy and wish you all the best being an independent researcher. Regards Eric Ashworth
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
At the moment, are you working towards a SSM E-Cat with the primary goal of generating heat, or the primary goal of generating electricity?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Electricity, electricity, electricity. I am working on it with the Team. Today a very good day, important discovery.
Warmest Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
See following link
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain
Steven N. Karels:
Now I understand, thank you !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr. Andrea.
Since You stated, that Your effect is neither fission nor fusion, how can Your scientific paper explain this ?
Prof12:
Did you study it ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Now you and your team are still in the preparation for a world wide launch of your products.
Did you study the enormous advantages of blockchain technology? For multiple uses security, control, data
(not to be confused with cryptocurrency as this can but certainly does not have to be a part of it)
and if you studied it, do you think this will be of a great advantage for the business model and if not why not?
Kind regards
Arjen:
I did not study it and, honestly, I do not know about it.
Can you be more precise about how can it be useful to the Ecat ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, You asked me to rephrase my question. I have tried twice but unsuccessfully. On my computer your site says Not Secure and I lose the information intended. So I am now typing direct. To be very brief, from my own experience academic institutions do not like independent researchers who fund their own projects and use their intuitive intelligence to solve important issues. This I have experienced first hand myself. The cancer cell has been described as, and I think it was said by Gaston Naessens who described it as like a spring running backwards but it could equally be described as a cell running too far forwards i.e. doing what its designed to do or like a marathon runner in a race whereby the finishing tape has become damaged or none existent and he likewise does what he is good at. The immune system is the regulator in the cycle of the cell. Camphor has been known for eons to be a ‘cure all’ but nobody seems to know how it works and it does work in certain cases of cancer. When you demonstrate your E-Cat SK in a self sustain mode you will be required to replenish the charge and the cancer researchers will know that what you have i.e. your technology is what they need.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
P.S. When my wifes breast cancer was cured by 714 the cancer specialist asked her where she had learned her black magic. I am not promoting 714X I have nothing to do with it but the subject of energy is a hot potato.
Eric Ashworth:
I am not able to follow this insight of yours.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
As you answered that you are working also on reaching to yield an electric gain of 80-90%, besides the heat, I suppose you already reached the SSM.
If you will reach a permanent SSM with electric gain (low entropy energy gain) you will make the most disruptive invention ever. This is close to the matter-antimatter of the science fictions.
Kind Regards,
Wilfried Babelotzky
Wilfried Babelotzky:
Thank you for your attention to our work: whay you say is a derivate from
http://www.researchnet.com/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On Power Engineering November 12th issue:
Energy utilities must do more to hire veterans anf give them the tools to succeed.
Rod Walton
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Thank you for your comment, that allows me to remind that today in the USA is the “Veterans Day”: honour to all who served to defend the values of their Country, in many cases with the extreme sacrifice. Had not the USA intervene in the second world war, today Europe would not be a free community of Countries.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
By the way,
I did not escape the clutches of the army since they drafted me for the next conflict, the Korean war, and I spent the next two years eating C rations.
Nostalgic regards.
Dear Andrea,
I would like to add these points. Nuclear fission probably saved my life since I was about to be drafted into the army and would have participated in the invasion of Japan. Casualties of this conflict were estimated to be in the millions. Value to me and other participants, incalculable. Competition with standard energy suppliers decreased the cost of energy to users throughout the world. Value of this incalculable.
Eernie1:
Thank you for your opinion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Following your latest updates on this blog here is my interpretation
of the 100+ last years of R&D in the area of nuclear energy extraction.
Theoretically available energy:
– presented 1905 by Einstein as E=mc2
Practical processes with significant efficiency:
Fission process:
– first uncontrolled release: 1945
– first controlled release: a few years later
Fusion process:
– first uncontrolled release: 1954
– first controlled release: still works in progress
Ecat-SK process:
– first controlled release: 2018
– Holy Grail of controlled release: Dec 2019
Did I get things right?
Kind regards
Sven B
Sven B:
If we will succeed, yes.
I’d add another point, though:
– investment paid so far by the taxpayer for “classic noclear energy, fusion and fission combined: around 30 billion $, plus the damages caused by accidents like Chernobyl, Three Miles island, etc ( uncalculable )
investments from the taxpayers for the work of my Team: zero
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven NJ. Karels:
4
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Is the primary issue(s) you are experiencing with achieving SSM one of:
1. Electronic control;
2. Fuel combination (e.g., an additive to stabilize the SSM);
3. thermal runaway; and/or
4. something else?
Dear Andrea, Would you say that the understanding and cure for cancer is directly related to the understanding of energy?, which you’re technology will be able to explain. In other words, would you share knowledge with outside academic researchers who would benefit from your understanding. Of course, I understand, that they would have to approach you because of protocol but the question is would you be willing to share such information?.
Regards Eric Ashworth
Eric Ashworth:
Sorry, I do not understand what you mean: can you rephrase ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
For anyone interested in the EBR 1
here are links to Ray Haroldsen
Videos an Engineer that worked there.
https://youtu.be/tNwX81SEJTU
https://youtu.be/39cTW1AjxbA
Sam:
Thank you !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Is a car with an internal combustion engine somewhat analogous to what you are trying to do with the E-Cat SK Leonardo?
The car needs a battery to start it up, then once the engine is running part of the power produced from the car charges the battery (via the alternator), and the battery runs all the electronics in the car. To operate, the car engine requires a fuel source, as does the E-Cat (although in tiny amounts).
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Correct,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
How do you start up the ssm process of the Ecat SK Leonardo:
a- by net supply
b- by accumulator/battery
c- by condensator
Waiting for good news,
Szymon Blachuta
Szymon Blachuta:
The simmplest solution is by battery where there is no grid ( for example in cars ) or grid. Any sourse can be adaptable, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
This is a link to a video about
Walter Zinn and his team that
where the first to make Electricity
from Nuclear power.
https://youtu.be/KncekYvqyWs
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Thanks for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I watched
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
Superb!
Cheers
Neil
Neil Bockenstedt:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Maestro Rossi:
You was born with a brilliant mind- but remember: “Roma uno die condita non est”
Angstrom
Angstrom:
I agree. ( He,he,he )
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Did I understand correctly that you are making the Ecat SK Leonardo in permanent ssm, which means that it makes heat and electricity, being the electricity in quantity enough to supply to the Ecat itself the electric energy necessary to work, plus perhaps also more electricity than the amount necessary for the self sustaining mode?
If so, if you will succeed the world will not be the same.
Good luck,
Humberto
H.P.:
Yes, that is what we are fighting for.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Are you using also the 3D technology in the R&D related to the Ecat SK Leonardo? Maybe to make some component not in commerce?
Rodolfo
Rodolfo:
Yes, we are.
We made a component that didn’t exist before, designed by us and that is crucial for the Ecat SK Leonardo to obtain the permanent ssm.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find commentds published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ready as always, since 2009.
Raf:
Thank you for your patience !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi:
I repeat my queswtion I put you in past: do you think the Ecat SK Leonardo will be able sooner or later to yield 80-90% of its energy in electric energy gain ?
Wilfried Babelotzky
Wilfried Babelotzky:
We are working to reach also that. We are working with all the force that God gives us.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
I have noticed that the number readings of your paper published on Researchgate and of the views of the video of the presentation of the Ecat SK are in the same order of magnitude, in fact:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
has obtained as of today 31198 full readings, and counting, while
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
has obtained more than 38000 views as of today and counting
Probably the reason of the unbelievable success of the paper, by far the most read nuclear physics paper in the world of the last years, stays in the coherence between theory and experimental results.
Do you agree?
All the best,
Marco
Marco:
I agree,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
A few years ago you ran a “destructive test” on an eCat. Since your underlying technology/implementation has evolved, will you or have you done a similar “destructive test”?
Steven N. Karels:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
European Union has issued a line of funds for the R&D in the field of energy obtained by nickel-hydrogen interactions: this is an important recognition of your work: when you first in the world made your Italian patent in 2008, in Europe the sole reaction had been a big laugh. Now they have understood the importance of your work.
Probably in the next 10-20 years they will fund the R&D on what you are doing now…
Stuart:
Maybe.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Are you currently seeing extended periods of SSM with the E-Cat SK Leonardo?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Not yet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Can you update about the work on the permanent SSM ?
You still optimist about the possibility to cpomplete the work by December ?
Thanks,
Mario
Mario:
We are continuing our job on it and my optimism is increasing; the next 2 weeks will be crucial.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Watching
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
I discovered that you have pulses in the graph of the oscilloscope.
Can you give more information about this particular ?
Follower:
sorry, I cannot.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
For your technology is the principle of indetermination of Heisenberg as fundamental as it appears in your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions ?
Ruby:
I think so.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
This is a link to an article
proving Albert Einstein
Theory and making him
famous.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/math/a29677190/einstein-eclipse-anniversary/
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Thank you, very interesting,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How much is in percentage during these days your personal engagement in the Ecat SK leonardo project?
Good luck,
Wilfred
Wilfred:
100%
Warm Regards,
A.R.
IObservable, I know how you are thinking but Andrea did not contradict, he answered in the only way possible with regards the questions put forward. The answers were different but not contradictory because of the subject. As I have stated before, unless a person has sufficient information, language becomes confusing and physics is without doubt a confusing subject whereby answers can easily be misinterpreted. There is no need for Andrea to confuse a person because there is no need to confuse that which is confusing i.e. there is nothing to hide and therefore nothing gained by providing what appears to be a contradictory answer to a highly technical subject. When the E-Cat SK is able to enter a self sustained mode, which we all know is possible from an atomic researchers perspective, it will be a little understood/novel technique with far reaching consequences for the whole of mankind.
Regards, Eric Ashworth.
@Prof,
Thank you Prof for your comment to IObservable.
He, most likely, is a troll.
I am sure Dr Rossi does not want to waste time responding to trolls; I think he probably never sleeps after long hours in the lab, not to mention the stress while thrashed by his wife on the tennis court! (LOL)
Chuck Davis
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Is the Clifford algebra useful to your theoretical research of models able to explain your effect?
Has it been useful in the writing of
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions ?
Cheers
S.
S.:
Yes. In particular, its elegant models give a unitarian vision of the different vectors interacting on integrated planes. It facilitates the inventing function.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Iobservable,
You did not understand what Andrea Rossi wrote. You did not understand what Eric Ashworth wrote either. Dr Rossi never has been contradictory and his answers are perfectly contingent with his honesty about the enormous difficulties he has to confront to make something that will change the world if successful. He always said he is optimist, but not certain of the success and this is not a contradiction, this is intellectual honesty as well as also Eric Ashworth said repeatedly.
I think the reasons of your writing can be alternatively two: either you are not enough intelligent to understand, or you are a troll that is trying to poison this blog. I give 50% of probability to either of these possibilities: do you like these numbers, or are they too contradictory for your mindset ?
I do not understand why Dr Rossi does not spam your provocations.
All the best,
Prof
@ Yrka:
Do You see ? Once he gave numbers, suddenly he cannot.
This means, again, that his answers are contradictory.
Like Eric A. already discovered.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi.
You answered IObservable: “The chances that we will be able to introduce Ecat SK Leonardo this year with a 1-month tolerance are 50.1%.”
I remembered a joke. The girl was asked the question
– What is the likelihood that you will meet a living dinosaur in the city?
He smiled:
– Fifty fifty, either meeting or not meeting.
This is a joke, we hope and believe in you and your team.
But still, what is the likelihood that Ecat SK Leonardo after the positive completion of the tests (even if it takes a few more months) will go into mass production?
Good luck to you and the team!
Yuri Isaev Engineer Tyumen, Russia
Yrka:
We work for that. Cannot give numbers, though.
Warm regards,
A.R.