Rossi Blog Reader

This website tracks recent postings to Andrea Rossi's Journal of Nuclear Physics, sorting the entries with priority to Rossi's answers, which appear under each question.


• Email to Andrea Rossi - Journal Of Nuclear Physics
• Website comments to the Webmaster (who has no contact or connection with Rossi).
• Updated: 2017-04-25 02:30:06.332373Z

  1. Andrea Rossi

    Toussaint Francois:
    It is, it is!
    Thank you for your concern!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  2. Dear Andrea,

    Wishing you well after the problem of today, I am sending the usualLINK

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-24-2017-lenr-what-i-think-about.html

    Fast healing!
    peter

  3. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your concern and for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  4. Dr. Rossi, if it is not too personal, can you tell us the purpose of your surgery ?
    You are well aware that we are all concerned about your health.
    First and foremost on a personal level.
    We want you to be around for a while !
    So we can all enjoy the E-Cat future together.
    Robert Curto
    Ft. Lauderdale Florida
    USA

  5. Andrea Rossi

    Robert Curto:
    The purpose was to remove a thing that was not good. It has been the third inyervention and I hope it will be the last.
    Tomorrow I return to work in my factory, therefore now I am well.
    Do not worry: I will be here when the E-Cat will be massively diffused. We are going to win all of our battles at any cost.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  6. Gianvico

    You wanna me to send you tortellini as painkillers? Are they approved by FDA?
    Gianvico

  7. Andrea Rossi

    Gianvico:
    Sure and Sure!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  8. N.

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Is it likely that your health problems come from the 352 days you spent in the E-Cat , 16 hours per day, mostly during the night?
    God bless you,
    N.

  9. Andrea Rossi

    N.:
    Possibly.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  10. Kyung

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    How many QuarkX can lead the control system?

  11. Andrea Rossi

    Kyung:
    Hundreds.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  12. Toussaint françois

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I wish you a quick recovery from this surgery, I hope this will be the last one !

    Warm regards

    Toussaint françois

  13. Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Today I have been all the day in hospital for further surgery.
    Waking up now.
    From the factory told all right.
    Later more comments
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  14. Hermes

    To transmute is easy.
    What you need is an inorganic or somewhat inorganic w/c does not react with metal.
    a catalyst (you can find one in periodic table)
    material (prefereably elements in periodic table) for it to be mixtured. either in powdered, pelletized or rods.
    and power(electricity) w/c would trigger the reaction on a lattice
    *the trick is how to contain the reaction.
    *transmutation is in many form.

    Find your own proper mixture
    you can do H2+Bi+Fe with rods(pathway of current) of pure silver(+) and copper (-)
    try it with a little amount.

  15. Andrea Rossi

    Hermes:
    Thank you for your insight: still, I’m afraid it doesn’t work that way.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  16. Hermes

    Hello Dr. Andrea Rossi,

    This is my theory why your reactor/the core/ecat, has little or no amount of radiation that happens.

    *The material/lattice does not react with metals undergoing fusion, somewhat inorganic.
    *Lattice is resistant to radiation.
    *Sub-atomic particles are not being split. Since fusion process occurs.

  17. Andrea Rossi

    Hermes:
    Thank you for your insight, but I am afraid it does not work that way.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  18. Italo R.

    Dr. Rossi, is it possible to know what type of battery are you using (voltage, capacity A/h)?
    Kind regards
    Italo R.

  19. Andrea Rossi

    Italo R,:
    We are using different types in this experimental phase. It is premature to give data.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  20. Jennine

    Dear Andrea:
    Thanks For Your Work.

  21. Andrea Rossi

    Jennine:
    Thank you for your sustain,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  22. Giuseppe

    Dear Andrea,
    seems that to activate the E-Cat you need heat, does the QuarkX need heat to be activated?
    Best regards, Giuseppe

  23. Andrea Rossi

    Giuseppe:
    Not exactly. The mechanism is much more complex and is based on electromagnetic fields.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  24. Mazda

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    I agree with your answer to Gerard McEk.
    The scientific world must be defended anyway.
    Prof

  25. Andrea Rossi

    Mazda:
    I agree,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  26. Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    In very good progress with the battery fueled system. I am very glad how things are going on in our R&D center of Miami.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  27. Dear Andrea,

    this is the laest Sunday issue of my blog:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-23-2017-lenr-why-opposition-to-it.html

    A fine coming week!
    peter

  28. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  29. Karl Poehlmann

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Please look at this:
    htpps://scitechdaily.com/yale-engineers-develop-plant-derived-material-to-purify-water/

  30. Andrea Rossi

    Karl Poehlmann:
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  31. Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    Thank you for your intelligent reply on why science seem to ignor LENR. I was aware of everything you mentioned and obviously I agree with you that not all scientists ignore LENR.
    I find it extremely difficult, though to pursuade scientists in the Netherlands to study the LENR field. They just say that LENR is impossible and look in another direction and I feel dreadfully ignored afterwards.
    Let me just say this: I believe that good scientists are those who are critical about their science and the theories. They should find out why the Theory is in conflict with the outcome of a scientifically performed test. It is their duty!
    You are critical, you found the anomaly and were able to reproduce it and now you are finding a theoretical way forward. That’s the right behavior, that’s the scientific approach, that makes you a proper scientist!
    Kind regards, Gerard

  32. Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    Thank you for your opinion,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  33. Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    1. What can you tell us about the progress of testing the QuarkX with battery power input?
    2. Do you plan to use a battery-powered QuarkX for the planned presentation?

    Best wishes,

    Frank Acland

  34. Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    1- it is on course
    2- if possible, yes
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  35. Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    It is interesting to see that you support science and asked your readers to pay attention, the more because the majority of science seems to ignore and reject LENR. Many of your followers blame these ignoring and rejecting scientists. They should embrace LENR because of the hundreds of peer reviewed reports that show that nuclear reactions are taking place in metal lattices. Clearly the existing theories do not sufficiently support the fact that LENR can take place at low stimulation energies and without the expected radiation, but that should not be a reason to reject LENR. In fact it is unscientific to ignor these hundreds of LENR reports. You studied science philosophy, I believe. Can you tell us what is wrong with science, why science behaves so unscientific from your perspective?
    Thank you and kind regards, Gerard

  36. Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    It is not true that the scientific community refuses LENR.
    See the work of the scientists that performed or directed or organized and found the funds for the the Lugano report: Sven Kullander was the Chairman of the Swedish Royal Academy of Science, to cite one, all of them are Prof of Physics in universities among the most credited in Europe, all of them worked in CERN of Geneva, Prof Focardi and Prof Bo Hoistad did direct important groups inside the CERN. Nobel Prize laureate Brian Josephson is positively oriented toward LENR and I could add hundreds of prestigious names of scientists (mainly physicists and nuclear engineers) that sustain LENR. NASA has published positive orientation toward LENR.
    On the other side of the playground, it is normal that in the scientific fields there are contrasts. Think about the Relativity theory: at its beginning it was considered a veritable clownerie from many top level physicists. I think the work of my Team has given a strong push to the fact that LENR turned considered worth of strong attention, because we have been able to produce real energy and our E-Cat is not a theoretical issue, but a product, albeit not yet massively diffused, but in the verge to do so. Nissan has replicated the effect described in my patent, I am aware of another replication on course funded by another industrial giant, one of the biggest industrial concerns of the world, Lockeed Martin has started an R&D adjacent to our field, Bill Gates has funded R&D in LENR field, etc. Obviously our products will reduce the skepticism to the edge, as it happened to the Relativity after the use we make of it anytime we make a phone call with out cell.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  37. Joya Del Sol

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    I am returning to your blog after a year and half and am curious to know how far down is the commercialization of your ECAT technology for the average user – what is the schedule? Is it 5 years? Or 10 years down the line? When do you foresee ECAT changing the energy landscape and markets of the world? Is it accurate to surmise that 2023 would be that commercial breakthrough year when electricity prices would become super inexpensive by virtue of your ECAT technology? (have been following the ecat story since the beginning in 2011 when you made a demonstration and have been hopeful ever since of the massive imminent positive impact on the world)

    Regards,
    Joya Del Sol,
    India.

  38. Andrea Rossi

    Joya Del Sol:
    Welcome back.
    I think the timeframe of the massive production of the E-Cats will be shorter.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  39. Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today on other posts of this blog.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  40. Dear Andrea,

    this is the EARTH DAY edition of my Blog:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-22-2017-lenr-earth-day-edition.html

    vivat Terra nostra!

    Peter

  41. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  42. Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    We are working well, operating also on the control system to work well with a battery.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  43. Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Today is the “Earth’s Day”: more than 600 rallies are on course around the world to sustain the scientific research, also in favour of the protection of the environment.
    We of the JoNP stand by the massive crowds that are gathering for science march.
    Dr Andrea Rossi, CEO of Leonardo Corporation and director of the Journal of Nuclear Physics

  44. Napoleon

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    The puppets of the so called “ventriloquist of Raleigh” are saying that IH received the 50 millions from Woodford because they had in portfolio many intellectual properties, not only yours. But I discovered that this is false! Reading the documents published by the Court, I saw that Woodford invested 50 millions in IH on February 2015 and at that time IH had only your IP in the portfolio! To make more clear the fraud of IH toward you, is the fact that Tom Darden made visits with only your IP in IH’s portfolio with senior officers of Woodford in your plant, to convince them to pay him the 50 millions and enjoyed the reference of the engineer of JM (Jim Bass) in the same day, during the visit of the same senior officers of Woodford in your plant of Doral.
    Isn’t this true?
    Cheers
    A friend of yours of the silent majority that sustains your work and is disgusted from the dishonesty of the ventriloquist.

  45. Andrea Rossi

    Napoleon:
    No comment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  46. Dear Andrea,

    This is the edition for this Friday- of EGO OUT
    Includes a story:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-21-2017-lenr-flowmeters-jaccuse.html

    wishing to you and readers fine weekend!
    peter

  47. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  48. Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    The AC output previously mentioned: AC is a broad term. Can you bound the measured frequency?

    a. below 100 Hertz
    b. Above 1 MHz
    c. Somewhere between a and b.

  49. Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    a.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  50. Genesis

    There is a need to bombard the reactor with halogen at the core level. Thus it will create a new form of light and new material/byproduct will be made.

  51. Andrea Rossi

    Genesis:
    ???
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  52. Tom Conover

    Hello Andrea,

    Just thought I would mention a fast track idea I had when I heard about your battery power source.

    I’m 99% certain that you already are on this path, but …

    Creation of a small device (less than 10KW, or even less than 1kW) for a the US Military and then mass producing it would be a very very much smaller project than mass producing 1MW plants for commercial use. The application of such a device is obvious and does not even need to be mentioned. The beauty of this would be that if you could agree with the client to produce both a commercial and military version then the commercial version could be your first industrial product launch.

    If the military haven’t already asked for this, ask them if they would be interested. They will say yes!

    The certification of such a tiny device for consumer use after millions are produced (might only take 12 months to get a very dramatic number of these installed) could influence the certification for home use.

    I am very excited to hear about this, mostly for the above reason.

    Questions for you, (Y/N)

    1) Is this path consistent with your current ideas for manufacturing?
    2) Is this path for home use certification something you think is a good idea?

    Wow!

    Congratulations on the battery powered version of the Quark. This is a very dramatic breakthrough!

    Your team rocks!

    Warm Regards,

    Tom

  53. Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    Thank you very much for your suggestion.
    It is intelligent.
    1- yes
    2- yes
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  54. Nils Fryklund

    Dear Andrea!

    I hope you have recovered from your surgery.
    Best regards
    Nils Fryklund

  55. Andrea Rossi

    Nils Fryklund:
    I did, thank you very much for your concern,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  56. Nils Fryklund

    Dear Andrea!
    Can´t you drive E-cat quarkX from a capacitor which both give and recieve electricity whitout a battery?
    Then will, for example, at a demonstration, quarkX work continously until the spectators finally notice its capacity.
    Best regards
    Nils Fryklund

  57. Andrea Rossi

    Nils Fryklund:
    Thank you for the suggestion, but I do not agree.
    Anybody can easily measure the energy consumed by an appliance and the calorimetric energy it produces by measuring the delta T of a certain amount of fluid. In addition, direct current makes things very much simpler.
    Your suggestion is a complication, not a simplification.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  58. Andrea Rossi

    Dr Joseph Fine:
    Thank you for your kind concern and for the information,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  59. Marco

    Dear Andrea,

    you are experimenting the QuarkX with DC voltage. But you also said that the current produced by the QuarkX is AC. So it seems that the AC frequency is not related with the input power frequency. What frequency does it have? Is it modifiable? What is the range?

    Best Regards,
    Marco

  60. Andrea Rossi

    Marco:
    Not ready for an answer.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  61. Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    You mentioned experimenting with a battery to power the eCat as opposed to using AC power as the power input from the electrical grid. Please clarify when you say a battery input as opposed to a DC voltage source.
    1. Are you looking for the portability of battery operation?
    2. Circuits exist to convert battery power to AC power. Why the interest in battery input versus a battery power inverter as an input?
    3. Is the mentioned difference in eCat performance related to battery capacity or the DC input voltage characteristics?

  62. Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    1- yes
    2- skip a step
    3- no
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  63. Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Also today very well.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  64. Joseph Fine

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I hope you have been recovering well and are back up to full power.

    The area of modular metals or laminates may be useful in your work.

    One of Modumetal’s alloys contains Nickel and Aluminum, which may or may not be an advantage.

    Since you contain materials at high temperatures, this technology may enhance product safety and performance.

    https://www.modumetal.com/pages/products-thermal-barrier-alloys

    Thermal regards,

    Joseph Fine

  65. Hank Mills

    Dear Andrea,

    Reading your comments about the testing of the E-Cat Quark X is fascinating. I’ve been trying to wrap my head around how this technology may work, and the following questions are based on those thoughts. So if my thinking is somewhat off or incorrect, I’ll thank you ahead of time for your typical gracious attitude towards some of us who must seem quite clueless.

    1) Are you feeding the output of the battery directly to the Quark X or are you feeding it into any control apparatus you may be using?

    2) Do you have a mechanism to adjust the voltage going to the Quark in response to the amperage being measured traveling between the cathode/anode and through the circuit?

    3) Is the rated voltage of the battery high enough to ignite the electrical arc discharge without some sort of DC voltage booster or inductor?

    4) Have you considered coating your nickel cathode with a layer of amorphous diamond or what is also referred to as “tetrahedral amorphous carbon” (Q Carbon is another name)? This is a substance that is composed of an approximate combination of 85% sp3 (diamond like) carbon bonds and 15% sp2 (graphite/graphene) like carbon bonds. The material is high density with the greatest number of nucleons per unit volume of any known substance. This property, among others, lowers the “work function” of the material which would enhance the thermionic emission efficiency (converting the anomalous heat to emitted electrons) and lower the start up voltage. A sputter coated layer of this material — the methods are in the literature — could possibly make the Quark X more compatible with a battery input.

    The only problem I see with such a coating is if your nickel cathode requires a continuous bombardment with hydrogen ions (bare protons)to continually produce excess heat. If this is the case, it is plausible that the amorphous diamond coating could either/or get worn away by the bombardment OR block the incoming ions that may be needed to keep the reaction going. However, if the cathode can be pre-hydrogenated for a period of time so that it has a long lasting store of hydrogen, the coating of amorphous diamond might not be an issue.

    Additionally, amorphous carbon is a perfect black body radiator, and it could also provide cooling for your nickel cathode — perhaps keeping it at a lower temperature. Amorphous diamond does “denature” at a really high temperature (I would have to look it up but I think it is over 1000C) and re-graphitize so that the sp3 diamond like bonds convert back into sp2 bonds.

    Finally, if the LENR reactions are producing any type of electromagnetic emissions, the amorphous diamond may efficiently convert them to electrons.

    Thank you for keeping us updated!

    Hank

  66. Andrea Rossi

    Hank Mills:
    1- We feed the control system
    2- confidential
    3- confidential
    4- confidential
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  67. Italo R.

    Dr. Rossi, am I correct saying that the DC of battery enters in a circuit that powers in some way the QuarkX?
    Kind Regards,
    Italo R.

  68. Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  69. Svein Henrik

    Dear Andrea.
    I am confident with the fact that You now are testing batteries as the power source for the QuarkX
    This confirm that the more critical issues now are completed. I hope you now may answer the following questions.
    1.Is a well working heat exchanger solution between the QuarkX and steam found?
    2.Is the meltdown problem truly overcome by regulating the capacity of the QuarkX?
    3.What is the highest number of QuarkX possible in a heat exchanger of 1000 cubic cm?
    4.May you now regulate the capacity of each QuarkX in a bundle?
    5.Or may the capacity of a bundle be regulated by on/off by each QuarkX?
    6.May the capacity automatically be regulated by the temperature of the steam produced?
    7.Do you see a possibility for the direct produced currency from the QuarkX to be used to charge batteries parallel to a heat production?
    Best regards Svein Henrik.

  70. Andrea Rossi

    Svein Henrik:
    1- we are using a heat exchanger
    2- yes
    3- 100 ?
    4- yes
    5- not necessarily
    6- yes
    7- maybe in future, not now
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  71. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  72. Patrick Ellul

    Dear Andrea,
    Many times you learn more from failed experiments than from successful ones.
    Regards
    Patrick

  73. Andrea Rossi

    Patrick Ellul:
    You are right. I learnt more from my failures than from my achievements.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  74. Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Thank you for your replies to my question. A couple more if you don’t mind?
    1. Even if the QuarkX is not working normally with the battery, is it working at all (even if less efficient)?
    2. You say that the electrical production from the QuarkX is alternating current (AC) — has this always been the case?
    3. Have you had to modify your control system for the battery powered experiment?

    Best wishes,

    Frank Acland

  75. Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    1. no
    2. yes
    3. yes
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  76. Italo R.

    Dr. Rossi, do you convert che battery DC to AC before powering che QuarkX?
    Best Regards
    Italo R.

  77. Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    No.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  78. Jasmine

    Dear Andrea:
    Your experiment with batteries is great!
    Congratulations,
    J.

  79. Andrea Rossi

    Jasmine:
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  80. Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Step forward for DTT, Divertor Tokamak Test Facility, the 500 million-euro project to build a strategic nuclear research fusion infrastructure in Italy. After the resolution approved by the X Chamber Commission (Production Activities, Trade and Tourism), which engages the Government to take initiatives for the implementation of the project in Italy, EUROfusion has also begun the final phase to fund the project.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fC69IgR1wxc&feature=share

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6ckXRbwCsU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cohv10E0th0

  81. Andrea Rossi

    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
    Interesting.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  82. Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    It’s interesting to hear you are experimenting running the quarkX with a battery.

    1. So far, does the QuarkX act normally with the battery as a power source?
    2. What is the power rating for the battery you are using?
    3. What advantages do you see in running the QuarkX from a battery?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  83. Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    1. no
    2. we are testing different sizes
    3. just more options and portability
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  84. Eva

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Very interesting your test with batteries. This will surely make easier the measurement of the COP: direct current is much easier to measure.
    Cheers,
    Eva

  85. Andrea Rossi

    Eva:
    Also, it helps us to measure with precision the alternate current directly generated by the reactor. It is a very interesting experiment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  86. JJ

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Today very important hearing in Court.
    Have you any comment about it?
    Jajo

  87. Andrea Rossi

    JJ:
    We are confident of the evidence we have deposited in Court.
    Everything that has to be said will be said by my Attorneys in Court.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  88. Weleda

    Dear Andrea:
    Do you still think that the basic module of the QuarkX will be rated 20 W?

  89. Andrea Rossi

    Weleda:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  90. Prof

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    If you are thinking to use a battery as a power source, this means you are reaching COP values really high: is what is written on the white board of the “clandestine” photo something close to reality?
    Cheers
    Prof

  91. Andrea Rossi

    Prof:
    I want not to comment the photo whose publication has not been authorized.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  92. Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    This morning we are making an experiment, testing the device to allow the QuarkX to be able to work either with battery or with AC power source, like a computer.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  93. Mario Alexander

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Do you think that it will be possible to use a battery as the power source of the QuarkX?
    God bless you,
    Mario

  94. Andrea Rossi

    Mario Alexander:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  95. Louis

    Dear Andrea:
    Was it worth to make all the work you made with the E-Cat and eventually compromise your health for it?

  96. Andrea Rossi

    Louis:
    There is a thing that is most important of my life: it is the scope of my life. Everything must be in function of it.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  97. Sammie Burgdorfer

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    The robots that will be used to manufactire the E-Cats will be of the humanoid kind?
    Cheers,
    Sammie

  98. Andrea Rossi

    Sammie Burgdorfer:
    Partially.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  99. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  100. Dr. Rossi, WWF April 19 at 7:18AM
    Your reply, “could be,” was too modest.
    You should have said the truth, the, whole truth. and nothing but the truth.
    I really believe it will.
    Robert Curto
    Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
    USA

  101. Andrea Rossi

    Robert Curto:
    Thank you.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  102. Stephen

    It seems that the QuarkX has been running for tests for a very while now which is remarkable for such a small device.

    Would you be able to let us know:

    1. how long the three quarks have been in operation?

    2. If it with the same initial fuel charge.

    3. If not the initial fuel how long with the current fuel charge

    4. If there is any sign of degrading in performance?

    I’m curious if you have found a clever way to extend the life of these kinds of devices from a fueling / catalyst point of view.

    Thanks for all your continued work in these days. We can all learn something about strong composure and resilience and persistence in what’s important when it’s needed from someone like you.

    I’m really glad to hear that your theoretical work with Oscar and Norman continues. They are really interesting and important approaches to understanding LENR. They work really well in synergy I think. Looking forward to see what comes up.

    I’m curious about what happens to the Helium and if it is used in the process some how. Perhaps this theory synergy gives some insights someday… I wonder perhaps it’s useful from ion bombardment / charge carrying or other mechanical points of view… But I look forward to seeing how it works out

    Best Regards and wish you continued strength in the months ahead

    Stephen

  103. Andrea Rossi

    Stephen:
    1. combined and not counting the interruptions, we are close to one year, during which many events happened and many corrections have been made
    2. yes
    3. n.a.
    4. no
    The real duration of a charge will be told only by experience. We’ll go on until we will know.
    Thank you for your kind sustain.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  104. wwf

    Dr Rossi:
    Do you think the E-Cat family will be a game changer for the environmental protection ?

  105. Andrea Rossi

    WWF:
    Could be.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  106. Rudy

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    In the update you are making of the Gullstrom-Rossi paper will be described also a calorimetric test?

  107. Andrea Rossi

    Rudy:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  108. Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    I am here with the QuarkX. It’s all right.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  109. Dear Andrea,

    This issue of EGO OUT is an intermediary between the one day peace of yesterday and what will start soon- on technical level:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-18-2017-lenr-info-learning-from.html

    Cheers,

    peter

  110. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  111. ANONYMOUS

    We understand you’re not responding to questions to your blog as sometimes, not saying anything is the best answer. As, silence can never be – misquoted.

  112. Andrea Rossi

    ANONYMOUS:
    Two cathegories of things I do not respond to:
    1- stupidities
    2- issues related to the litigation
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  113. Anonymous

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    I love your answer to Newt.
    Cheers,
    A.

  114. Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  115. Newt

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    What do you think of the slanders published against you? Why you never react?
    May the Force be with you!
    Newt

  116. Andrea Rossi

    Newt:
    Chatters. Not worth to be answered.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  117. Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    I am right now with “her” and she is marching well toward Sigma 5.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  118. Svein Henrik

    Dear Andrea.
    Your answer to Cavliere april 17, was very interesting.
    When may we expect the results to be published?
    Svein Henrik.

  119. Andrea Rossi

    Svein Henrik:
    I do not know, because it will depend on the peer reviewing period. Our theoretical and experimental work will take about 30 more days.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  120. Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    I do hope you are recovering well. It really concerns me. Have you started to play tennis with your wife again during the easter days?
    Last time when I wished you well for your health, you did not answer. Maybe I used the wrong words, for which I apologize in that case.
    Just a few questions about your progress with the QuarkX.
    1. Does the measurements with proper calometry instrumentation confirm measurements done in the past?
    2. Does your co-operation with Mr Gullström improve your progress with the QuarkX?
    3. Does your strong co-operation with Gullström mean that you also believe that neutrons can move from one atom to another under some circumstances?
    4. Are you still also co-operating with professor Cook to improve the theory?
    Thank you for answering our questions.
    Kind regards, Gerard

  121. Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    Thank you for your care. I am well. You have nothing to apologize about.
    Answers:
    1- The COP is lower, but in the same order of magnitude
    2- Yes
    3- Our paper speaks for itself and I prefer not to add anything, pending a substantial review of it
    4- I have enormous esteem for Norman Cook, whose book has inspired my work since the day it has been published ( I bought a copy of the first edition several days after its publication, same thing I did after the publication of the second edition ). Of course our collaboration will continue and we have agreed upon the next starting point, when I will be able to give him data that now I cannot supply. As you have seen in the documents published of the litigation, IH has accused me to have violated the NDA with the publication of the paper Cook-Rossi: while this accusation is ridiculous, since they had approved the draft before the publication on Arxiv Physics, this fact explains to you how mined is the field I have to walk through.The theoretical work on course with Carl-Oscar Gullstroem is perfectly conciliable with the atomic structure theorized by Prof Norman Cook.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  122. C.

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Can the negative comments against you organized in the blogs by your foe influence negatively the Court?

  123. Andrea Rossi

    C.:
    No. The Court decisions are based upon facts and evidence, not upon opinions and chatters. This is what makes us confident of the strength of our case.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  124. Dear Andrea,

    More for continuity and symmetry I have published today a blog issue too:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-17-2017-lenr-info-shortissimo.html

    Cheers,
    Peter

  125. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  126. Andrea Rossi

    Jackson Sweeney:
    You must make a distinction between Global Symmetry and Local Symmetry.
    The G.S. is shown uniformly, everywhere, at the same time and makes us aware of interactions on course, but its role is passive, it does not bring new forces in the fields.
    L.S. shows up separately, at every point and leads to new forces: without it the Universe as it is could not exist, because e.p. would remain as they are, without interactions: the life ( if any) would be very boring. Master in local symmetry breaking is the Higgs field, that with its waves ( Higgs Bosons) makes a storm in the Universe Ocean, and this storm makes a mess through the fields of the elementary particles fiving mass to some of them, rupturing symmetries around…imagine the perfest symmetry of a cloud of black ink cenospheres be turned into the Guernica of Picasso ! That’s life !
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  127. Andrea Rossi

    Cavaliere:
    Yes. We are preparing an updated version, more detailed and with the addiction of the description of an experiment made with standard calorimetry, whose results will be compared to the results obtained by direct measurements made using the Wien and Boltzmann equations. Also the theoretical part will be reviewed. We are studying and experimenting.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  128. Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Very good update, we are working well also today to reach the target of Sigma 5.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  129. Jackson Sweeney  

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    What is the importance of Symmetry in Physics?
    Thank you if you can answer,
    Jackson

  130. Cavaliere  

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Are you still studying with Carl-Oscar Gullstroem on the theory you published on Arxiv Physics?
    Thanks,
    C.

  131. Dear Andrea,

    There are two issues of my blog today, or 1.5 approx:
    First a present for the PdD faithful:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-16-2017-lenr-dr-vitalii-kirkinskii.html

    and second a shortened current issue:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-16-2017-lenr-current-simplified.html

    HAPPY EASTER!

    peter

  132. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  133. Marianne

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Your expert, Prof Wong of the University of Miami, has written the book “Thermodynamics for Engineers”, that is studied in engineering universities for the exams of thermodybamics: why don’t you make him send a copy of it to the experts of IH, so they understand the concept of Thermodynamics? Their reports, in particular the one of Murray, violate the first and the second principle!
    Cheers,
    Marianne

  134. Andrea Rossi

    Marianne:
    No comment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  135. Prof

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Happy Easter to you and your Team!
    Thank you for your great work.
    Prof

  136. Andrea Rossi

    Prof:
    Thank you and again
    Happy Easter to all our Readers!
    Andrea Rossi

  137. Marco

    Dear Andrea,

    I was ever wondering… We know that the universe is expanding and so in a sense, new “space” is being created. But how the expansion is taking place? Are all the atoms getting bigger or are just the galaxies separating, remaining of the same size. In other words it’s only the space that is expanding and all atoms, planets, solar systems and galaxyes remains of the same size, sliding in the expanding space? Can this be verified with the Higgs field? If not only the space is expanding, but also ourselves, we should se the higgs field going down…

  138. Andrea Rossi

    Marco:
    Our solar system is not expanding, as well as we are not expanding, with exception of days like this, but that is an expansion confined in the belly of the humans.
    Thanks to God, the Higgs field value in vacuum remains constant. The reason of the expansion of the Universe is not well known. One of the theories on course is that out there is a “Dark Matter” whose mass generates the gravitational pull that makes the universe expand, but no clear evidence has been found of this “Dark Matter” yet…should it be cleared, could not be dark.

  139. Alberto

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    In a blog has been published that the firm USQL, of Engineer Fulvio Fabiani, belongs to the same trust that owns Leonardo Corporation ( Florida Energy Trust): is it true?

  140. Andrea Rossi

    Alberto:
    It is totally false that the company USQL belongs, directly or indirectly, to any trust that owns Leonardo Corporation. If any blog has published this information, it must be clear that:
    1- this information is false , therefore who published it is a fraudolent bloggist, probably paid to make a so blatant falsification. Should be a journalist, for such a falsification this fraudster would have been fired.
    2- this information gives the measure of the low level of the puppets
    3- the ownership of USQL has been published in the deposition sworn by Eng. Fabiani, that has been disclosed in the pacemaker of the Court. The ownership of USQL is also very easy to verify in the published documents and in the public register of the USA companies:also such document has been published in Court.
    Clearly our foes, not having true arguments to make their case better, are now recurring to false statements.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  141. Dear Andrea,

    My blog’s posting for today:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-15-2017-lenr-prediction-and-info.html

    I hope you have a really Buona, serena Pasqua!

    Peter

  142. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  143. Warren

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    So, based on your answer to K, should the value of the Higgs field go suddenly down to 0, would the universe explode?
    Thank you if you can answer,
    Warren

  144. Andrea Rossi

    Warren:
    Yes, but this statement belongs to the cathegory of ” had my father 6 balls, I could be a pinball”.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  145. Brokeeper

    Dear Andrea,

    I wish you and yours a very joyful Resurrection Easter day as well to your remarkable team.
    God bless you all,
    Brokeeper

  146. Andrea Rossi

    Brokeeper:
    …and you !!!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  147. Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    I hope you are feeling better, have you a full recovery soon? We all hope to hear that you have regained your strength.

    May I inquire two questions please, if you are feeling well enough …

    1) Will your full production design be completed after the trial ends (within 30 days) or before the trial ends? (or is it impossible to know at this time “C”?) (A/B/C)
    2) Does the completion of the trial influence the Sigma 5 testing, if you win the trial, will Sigma 5 complete? (Y/N)

    Thank you for your communications with me and all that you share here in the blog with us!

    ***** 5 Stars!

    Peace be with you,

    Tom

  148. Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    Thank you for your kind concern.
    Answers:
    1- C
    2- No
    A peaceful Easter also to you!
    A.R.

  149. Engineer48

    Murray, Smith and IH are not going to like this. Smoking gun stuff:

    Interesting photo from Dr. Wong:

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a339764be7a69d6d9ed7e4eb363cf166a0c14eeb1ce0f3ffd3d44f80a741a558.png

    Inquisitive minds would ask why is the floor on the left clean and not walked on?

    Maybe because there was a steam pipe there, that connected the bypass in the JM container to the upper story heat exchanger?

    Also note a telltale lighter mark from the centre of that clean patch toward the outer edge of the landing.

    Sure looks like, to this Black Swan, that a steam pipe could have been there for the duration of the 350 day test.

    Best regards,
    Engineer48

  150. Andrea Rossi

    Engineer48:
    No comment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  151. Archie

    Dear Andrea:
    Why don’t you sue the guys that slander you in some blog?

  152. Andrea Rossi

    Archie:
    Chatters and lies are automatically annihilated by facts. Besides: the sceptics system is divided in two sub-systems: one of the paid puppets and one of the honest doubters. The second sub-system will automatically change idea in front of facts, whilst the first sub-system counts nothing, because people are not stupid and I am sure at this point everybody understood well its situation.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  153. Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Thanks to God, also today we are working in very good standing.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  154. Marco Serra

    Caro Andrea
    ti auguro di cuore Buona Pasqua. Ti seguo tutti i giorni e prego per te, per la tua salute e per il tuo lavoro di cui l’umanità ha un estremo bisogno.

    Che Dio ti benedica
    Marco Serra

  155. Andrea Rossi

    Marco Serra:
    Thank you for your kind sustain,
    Happy Easter to you,
    A.R.

  156. F.A.

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Is it confirmed that when the massive production will start, it will begin with one factory in the USA and one in Sweden?
    Happy Easter,
    Adrian

  157. Andrea Rossi

    F.A.:
    Yes
    Happy Easter to you,
    A.R.

  158. Andrea Rossi

    Rip Kirbiyan:
    My plans for the future did not change.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  159. Dear Andrea

    On EGO OUT, today it has appeared:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-14-2017-lenr-few-words-about-pain.html

    HAPPY EASTER TO YOU AND ALL READERS!

    Peter

  160. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Happy Easter,
    A.R.

  161. Rip Kirbyian

    Dear Andrea,

    I hope you are doing well! I guess the court case must be tiring! I wonder if you could tell anything (anything!) about your future plans or whats coming in a near future regarding your Swedish factory!

  162. K.

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    First of all, Happy Easter.
    Please an Easter gift: without the Higgs fields would all the Fermions be massless?
    K.

  163. Andrea Rossi

    K:
    Not indeed, because the mass of protons and neutrons is made up mainly by the virtual e.p. that hold together the quarks, therefore the decrease of mass of the quarks would not affect much the total mass. The most dramatic change would be not in the mass of objects, but in their dimensions, because the lower mass of electrons would enlarge in proportion the fields of the electrons: a tennis ball could become as big as a condominium…unless the bigger dimensions will make impossible the complexity of the molecules that compound a tennis ball…reduce more the value of the Higgs field and a single atom could become as big as a solar system! Fortunately, the value of the Higgs field is not left to the stock exchange.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  164. Pietro F.

    Una serena Pasqua anche a Lei e alla sua famiglia.

    Pietro F.

  165. Andrea Rossi

    Pietro F.:
    Thank you!
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  166. Andrea Rossi

    DEAR READERS:
    Happy Easter to all our Christian Readers and wonderful Holidays to all of Them from our Team !!!
    With love,
    Andrea Rossi

  167. JPR

    Update?
    What will you do during these Easter Holidays?
    Happy Easter,
    Jean Paul Renoir

  168. Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    The update is positive, the QuarkX is continuing to march toward Sigma 5.
    During the Holy Days of course I will dedicate the due time to my spiritual and religious duties, play mini tennis with my wife ( I can’t play tennis yet ) and work. Today important meeting for the Court with my Attorneys.
    Happy Easter to you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  169. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  170. Andrea Rossi

    Daniel De Caluwe’:
    Thank you very much for your sustain;
    I am doing my best at the max of my possibilities.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  171. Steven N. Karels

    Daniel De Caluwé,

    I would contend that once the effective COP becomes very large, it makes sense to use the system’s output to drive the eCat’s energy input, with suitable buffering. Andrea and I have had previous discussions when the projected COP was 6 about it is more economical to use a different energy source, such as natural gas, rather than use an expensive energy such as that from an eCat reactor. There were also discussions about suitable buffering to avoid instability problems from the output being used for the input to the same reactor.

    As COP goes up, beyond some specific value, it makes more sense to use the power plant’s output or waste energy to power the input. Suitable buffering would be needed (think of batteries or similar energy storage) to handle output-to-input oscillations and instability problems. So, conceptually, it is possible that a huge number of small eCat reactors might power a large electricity production plant. 1GW units are in existence (e.g., China). I am asking Andrea if there are less obvious limitations that are not apparent to me regarding this application.

  172. Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    It is very difficult to answer, without specific experience. Theoretically the answers would be both “yes”, but I won’t guess.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  173. Prof

    Dear Andrea,
    The so called ventriloquist of Raleigh now is making his puppets say that the window you indicated to be the exhaust of hot air was closed and therefore it could not work: a colossal stupidity, since in your deposition and in the deposition of prof Wong has been clearly said that:
    A- the window and its glasses were removable
    B- you used to change the output configuration depending on the necessities of the excess heat
    Note: they did not present a series of many photos like that, made in different dates,but just one, meaning they did not find the window closed in other moments: which meaning can have the fact that the window was closed for several moments, out of billions of moments? None!
    By the way: in that photo it appears that the window had 4 glasses, and while the two right glasses ( from the observer) were on, the two left glasses were missing.
    Your say?
    Cheers
    Prof

  174. Andrea Rossi

    Prof:
    I cannot comment issues that have to be discussed in Court.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  175. Daniel De Caluwé

    @Steven N. Karels,

    I thought I’ve read somewhere that the present QuarkX comes in units of 20 Watt each, so you will need 125 million such QuarkX reactors tot get 2.5 GigaWatt thermal energy output giving via a Carnot cycle 1GigaWatt = 1000MegaWatt electrical output, replacing an ordinary big nuclear power plant. But of course, we hope the effective COP of the advanced QuarkX even will be higher than 100 (which, of course, already is very, very, very good…).

    Kind Regards,
    Daniel.

  176. Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    In my previous post, question 4 dealt with a 1GW electricity production plant running a thermal Carnot cycle. Given a total efficiency of 40%, about 2.5GW of thermal power would be needed to heat the working fluid to power the electricity generation. So, for example, if the eCat individual reactor nominally generated 100W of thermal power, you would need to parallel couple about 25 million such eCat reactors to generate the required amount of thermal power for such an electricity production plant.
    1. Is this conceptually possible, control wise or any other limitations?
    2. If the effective COP was 100, you would need 25MW of input power to control the eCat reactors or about 2.5% of the electricity plant generation. Does this seem correct?

  177. Daniel De Caluwé

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    I have been away from your forum for a very long time, but as I was, back again, involved in a discussion about future energy production possibilities, I can not else than refer to LENR and your very important work, that is so needed in the world today. So I wish you a very good health, and a lot of strength to go through the litigation, that unfortunately is taking a lot of your time, and, of course, a successful breakthrough to sigma 5 with your Quark X!

    The world really needs your invention, and therefore I wish you all success and the strength of a Lion to fight for it.

    Kind Regards,
    Daniel.

  178. Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Today will be totally dedicated from me in the factory to the QuarkX: she is going very well.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  179. Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    At one point, you were considering a family of eCat reactor sizes, namely 1kW, 10kW and 100kW thermal output per reactor, as I recall. Most likely, the eCat reactors could be run in parallel to produce a combined power of any multiple of the nominal output per reactor. For example, 100 10kW eCat reactors producing a total of 1MW of thermal output power.

    With the QuarkX technology, have you changed your approach regarding a family of reactor output sizes?

    1. Do you see a still foresee a family of output sized eCat reactors, e.g., 100W, 1kW, 100kW?
    2. Is it more advantageous to stay with a relatively small thermal output and couple them in parallel as compared to a single larger eCat reactor?
    3. At what point in parallel operation does control become too complicated, e.g., 255 units?
    4. To support a 1GW electricity generation plant, you would need about 2.5GW of eCat reactor thermal output, Do see parallel operation at this output level feasible?
    5. Are smaller thermal output eCat reactors, when used in parallel, easier to control than a single larger thermal output eCat reactor?

  180. Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    1- The QuarkX allows more combinations
    2- yes
    3- it is not a problem to parallel the boards to a number theoretically unlimitless
    4- to do what?
    5- yes
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  181. Dear Andrea,

    Sending now the EGO OUT posting for today:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-12-2017-lenr-info.html

    Cheers
    peter

  182. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  183. Vilma Elxolvy

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    In the photo in which you are training your Team in front of the blackboard it is indicated something with a COP over 1700: do you think the QuarkX will be in that range?

  184. Andrea Rossi

    Vilma Elxolvy:
    We are making a strong work and we are satisfied of the results so far, but I will give precise information only at the presentation of our product.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  185. Prof

    DT:
    in the report of the “superexpert” of IH, better known as Mr Smith, there is another pearl: before, in other reports of him and the other “superexpert Murray, they said the flowmeter was fake, that the amount of water was minimal, etc etc…now, with a dramatic “u” turn, Mr Smith writes that he has discovered that there was a water pump able to pump the amount od water to reach 1 MW. But, at the same time, he says that in this case the circuit is very restricted and limited to several tens of feet, and makes a sketch of how the circuit “should be”: but if it was true, and if in the plant of JM there was not work going on, which is the base of IH conjectures, alors the steam could never condensate, because there was not room for that and this fact is in contradiction with the other assumption of both these “superexperts”, which is that there was not steam but only hot water: this is impossible, because , as low as the power might be, recirculating the water acrodd so few meters of pipes without heat exchange, the water unavoidably sooner or later becomes steam. I agree with you: either the two “superexperts” of IH are completely inexpert of the matter, or they pretend to be stupid to try to manipulate the non expert audience. In conclusion: either Mr Murray and Mr Smith made voluntarily fraudolent reports, or they are basically ignorant of the matter.
    All the best,
    Prof

  186. Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Thanks to God, we are here in the factory and the QuarkX is continuing his trip to Sigma %.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  187. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  188. Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Also today we are on our way toward Sigma 5.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  189. Dr. Rossi, I want to join with all your other Readers.
    However I KNOW you are going to have a full recovery.
    Because God Himself knows, of the 7 billion people He put on this Earth, you are one of a kind !
    Robert Curto
    Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
    USA

  190. Andrea Rossi

    Robert Curto:
    As everybody is. Thank you!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  191. Steven

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Can you explain how are related gravity and mass?
    Thank you,
    Steven

  192. Andrea Rossi

    Steven:
    Gravity and mass are not directly related. An object that has mass conserves its mass also in absence of gravity, while particles that have not mass, like photons, feel the pull of gravity.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  193. Julianne

    Dear Andrea:
    How is it possible that an expert boiler engineer like Smith, the expert of IH, does not know that the flow rate of a fluid pump is an integral in function of the pressure? Is he so stupid or predends to be stupid to try to fool the audience?
    All the best,
    Julianne

  194. Andrea Rossi

    Julianne:
    I cannot comment issues that can be discussed in Court.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  195. Alycia Lema

    Dear Andrea,
    Are you still studying together with Catl-Oscar Gullstrom upon the theoretical bases of your effect, after the Gullstrom-Rossi paper?
    Cheers,
    Alycia

  196. Andrea Rossi

    Alycia Lema:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  197. ihfanboy

    Mr Rossi:
    My opinion is that the Quarkx does not exist, the Ecat does not exist, the intellectual property of Leonardo Corporation does not exist. Thank you for spamming this comment.

  198. Andrea Rossi

    ihfanboy:
    Thank you for your opinion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  199. Dear Andrea,
    Our modest contribution for the new week start is here:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-10-2017-lenr-litigation-not.html

    Best wishes,
    Peter

  200. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  201. Brian

    @DT:
    Great comment, thank you,
    Brian

  202. Dear Rossi,
    this international team of researchers develops a thermoelectric device with graphene reduces phonons and by about 95% the thermal conductance so increasing the efficiency.

    http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02005

    Hope can be usefull for your “nucleon” reactor, lavoLale lavoLale.

    Enrico Billi

  203. Andrea Rossi

    M.Sc. Enrico Billi:
    Thank you for the information.
    Lavolale, lavolale!
    A.R.

  204. H-G Branzell

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    You did not want to comment on a picture taken during a session under NDA at Lenoardo Corporation. I can appreciate that.

    Let us instead look at the publicly available document: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.05249.pdf

    Ina this report similar calculations are described, quote:
    “Input: 0.105 V of direct current over a 1 Ohm resistance.”

  205. Andrea Rossi

    H-G Branzell:
    The paper Gullstrom-Rossi speaks for itself and I want not to comment further the cited experiment. We will give further information related to the QuarkX only when it will be introduced and its experimental phase will have been completed. So far any further information is considered for us confidential.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  206. Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Hello dr. Rossi:
    I am sending an interesting article.

    Battle between quantum and thermodynamic laws heats up
    Physicists try to rebuild the laws of heat and energy for processes at a quantum scale.

    Davide Castelvecchi

    http://www.nature.com/news/battle-between-quantum-and-thermodynamic-laws-heats-up-1.21720

  207. Andrea Rossi

    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
    Very interesting battle. Very interesting indeed.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  208. Sven

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Let me be the first to wish you a successful return to your factory to make the QuarkX a reality and wish all the Readers Happy Easter !
    Sven

  209. Andrea Rossi

    Sven:
    Thank you for your kind wishes and I too wish a Happy Easter to you and all our Readers!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  210. Vernell

    Dear Andrea Rossi:
    What do you think of the attempt of replication of your effect on course with the experiment “New Fire” made by MFMP in India?

  211. Andrea Rossi

    Vernell:
    I will have an idea when I will receive a complete report about it. So far I do not have enough information.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  212. Dear Andrea,

    The last day of this difficult- for you especially- week and the last issue of EGO OUT for it.
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-9-2017-lenr-will-not-be-drowned-in.html

    best return to the battles for you!
    cheers,
    Peter

  213. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  214. Barton

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    “tomorrow I will be back in my factory”: unbelievable.
    God bless you
    Barton

  215. Steve

    About the comment of DT:
    the “tone” of Smith’s expertise disturbed me. It seems highly prejudicial and unprofessional. Especially for someone alleged to have 40 years of experience.
    Best Regards,
    Steve

  216. Andrea Rossi

    Dr Irina and Vitaly Uzikov:
    Your concern is moving and I thank you for this. I am recovering well, too much work to do to be differently.
    We surely will have work to make together.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  217. Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    The QuarkX is still on its way toward Sigma5 and I am making progress in the study of the industrialization system. The work goes on. Tomorrow I am back in my factory.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  218. Karen Monsay

    DT:
    It appears Mr Smith does not know that the mass of an object is its energy while at rest.

  219. Prof

    @DT:
    I totally agree with your comment. By the way, another thing that appears evident about the “expertise” of Mr Smith is that he talks of a plant he does not know: the sole serious phrase of his texts is where he says that he never saw the plant. For example, the diameters of the steam pipes are totally different from reality, as we can see from the depositions of Dr Andrea Rossi.
    All the best,
    Prof

  220. Irina and Vitaly Uzikov

    Dear Andrea!

    From the bottom of our hearts, we wish you a speedy recovery!

    Irina and Vitaly Uzikov

  221. Martinelli

    Dr Rossi

    What ever became of T.Barker the engineer for IH that was filing for patents of your technology and naming himself as a co-inventor?

    Rimettiti presto,

    M.

  222. Andrea Rossi

    Martinelli:
    I cannot comment on issues that have to be discussed in Court.
    Thank you for the kind wish,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  223. Erik

    Dear DT:
    Fantastic comment, you made naked the false expert.
    It was time!
    Cheers,
    Erik

  224. Dear Andrea,

    A new edition of the EGO OUT LENR dedicated Blog for Saturday, Apr 8 this year

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-8-2017-great-lenr-theory-review-and.html

    Wishing you good recovery and all well!
    peter

  225. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  226. Oliver

    DT:
    Thank you for your intelligent insight on the “expertise’ of the fake expert Mr Smith. It was past due.
    All the best,
    Oliver

  227. Andrea Rossi

    Toussaint Francois:
    Thank you, very kind. Monday I will be back in the battlefield.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  228. Toussaint François

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I hope you will be back soon near your splendid Quark-x.

    I wish you with all my heart good health and swift recovery!

    Warm regards.

    Toussaint François

  229. domenico canino

    Dear Andrea,
    i hope you are in good health now. I would like you to enjoy another good job made in Florida.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQzLrvz4DKQ
    warm regards

  230. Andrea Rossi

    Domenico Canino:
    Very curious and genial!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  231. Andrea

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    How are you today?
    God bless you,
    Andrea

  232. Andrea Rossi

    Andrea:
    I am OK, thanks to God.
    Monday I will return to my factory.
    Thank you for your concern,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  233. DT

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Surely you have realized that the “expertise” of Mr Smith, super-expert-consultant of IH in the litigation, is a fraud. It is totally based on two issues, both wrong:
    1- he says that a COP higher than 1 is against the principles of thermodynamic
    2- he says the pumps of the E-Cats had a flow rate of 36 liters per hour and gives evidence of this fact by a photo of the label of a Prominent pump installed on the E-Cat.
    As a matter of fact, the cases can only be two: either Mr Smith is not an expert, and in this case the issue is over, or he is giving voluntary false information in change of money. In fact, it is impossible that an expert ignores that:
    1- the thermodynamic principles must be applied to a specific system and in the case of the E-Cat the system is nuclear, not chemical, therefore it is possible that the COP is higher than one, because the chemical energy at the input induces nuclear energy: the three thermodynamic principles are fully respected because of the Einstein equation.
    2- the Prominent pump , as every pump, has a flow rate that is in function of the hydraulic pressure: Mr Smith has hidden to the readers the fact that in the same photo that he reports in his “expertise” is clearly written that the pressure is 2 Bar at the flow of 36 liters per hour !!! Obviously if the pressure is lower, the flow rate increases. I have personally used that model of Prominent pump and at a pressure of 0.2 Bars its flow rate is about 90 liters per hour. If we look well the photo of the pumps system of the E-Cat we can see that the pumps have to raise the water of few tens of centimeters, while 2 Bars correspond to 20 meters !!!! At a rate of 90 liters per hour, the maximum flow rate of all the pumps combined is well above the 1,600 liters per hour necessary to the E-Cat to reach a rate of about 1 MW.
    Not to mention other enormous errors, like for example the fact that the superheating of the steam must be made as he says: this guy does not even know how boilers work, or, most likely, lies in change of money.
    Besides, somebody has to explain to him that the steam at 103 Celsius at room P is dry by physics laws. Plus, in the documents published by the Court is clearly described that along the steam line there was a trap to check if water was contained in the steam.
    Mr Smith’s “expertise” is based upon his assumptions, with schematics he invented on the base of fake information, like the flow rate of the Prominent pumps.
    Conclusion: the “expertise” of Mr Smith is a bogus and Mr Smith is a person that exposes himself to ridiculous errors in change, as he himself writes, of about 300 $ per hour.
    If this is your foe, dear Andrea, you will destroy them also from the hospital, even if you remain asleep.
    From Russia, with love,
    DT

  234. Andrea Rossi

    DT:
    I cannot comment on issues that have to be discussed in Court.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.