Rossi Blog Reader
This website tracks recent postings to Andrea Rossi's
Journal of Nuclear Physics,
sorting the entries with priority to Rossi's answers, which appear under each question.
• Email to Andrea Rossi - Journal Of Nuclear Physics
• Website comments to the Webmaster (who has no contact or connection with Rossi).
• Updated: 2019-07-18 07:00:05.506981Z
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Regarding the previous question on Fusion vs Fission on JONP, it appears from your referenced paper that you are suggesting that a “long-range” transfer of effectively one neutron from one type of atom to another is occurring. It would be of the form (A(pA,nA) + B(pB,nB) -> A(pA, nA-1) + B(pB, nB+1)).
Questions:
to be effective, would the all or some of the following be required:
1. The combined mass of the original atoms be less than the combined mass of the resulting atoms? (i.e., excess energy is produced)
2. The resulting atoms must be stable?
3. No proton shifting is allowed (no new elements removed or produced)
I am considering developing a computer program to see what combinations are effective and the amount of net energy produced.
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for your insight, but the mechanism is completely different. As probably you read on my researchgate paper, we are thinking to nothing like these hypothesis.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I want to ask several questions about retrieving an electrical current from the plasma.
If I understand correctly, the electrical energy is being obtained from an electromagnetic field in or around the plasma. My questions are:
1.Could something like an “antenna” (or an appropriately configured physical structure inside the reactor) be used to convert the energy of the electromagnetic field into an electric current?
2.Would the recovered electrical current be AC?
3.Would the physical dimensions of the antenna be most efficient at producing an electrical current if it were physically one quarter wavelength of the energy in the electromagnetic field?
Thank you for your dedication and hard work in creating a revolution in energy production.
Best Regards,
Bill Hayes
Bill Hayes:
1- I cannot answer in positive or in negative
2- It can be either AC or DC
3- same as in 1
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi,
hello to all readers
For information
The Louvre Museum in Paris is organizing from October 24th, 2019 to February 24th, 2020 an exceptional exhibition on Leonardo da Vinci on the occasion of the five hundredth anniversary of his death
Those interested will find all the information on the Louvre website.
Best regards
Raffaele
Raffaele Bongo:
Thank you for the information !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Watching carefully
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
I discovered that the Teslameter indicated clearly an electromagnetic field generated by the plasma, which means that electric current was generated too. Is this observation that started your R&D on the direct production of electricity from the plasma?
Thank you if you can answer,
Anna
Anna:
Also.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is not only the most read among the 15 million papers published by researchgate, it is also one of the most important papers published in the last ten years.
All the best,
CC
CC:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Industrial Heat has made a patent application copying all the work of Francesco Celani, without his authorization. This fact shows how desperate they are…and also that Tom Darden is still the one so well described by Sifferkoll.
Chuck:
No comment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Is it important the orientation of the Ecat SK? For example: if you turn it upside-down, can it work as well?
Cheers
Jamal
Jamal:
The orientation does not affect the operation of the Ecat. Yes, you can turn upside down the reactor with no effects deriving from this fact.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Is it impossible that you will show your Ecat SK leonardo with direct production of electricity by the end of the year?
Jefferson:
It is not impossible.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On Power Engineering July 16 2019: Rebalancing the Energy Approach- interview with Mario Azar, president of Black and Veatch Power
Rod Walton
Rod Walton:
Thanks for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
With respect to the possibility of achieving 90% electricity, 10% heat: I find that possibility so very exciting; I wish you every possible success.
If successful, it would be an amazing, break-through product, useful in just about every industry and in every corner of the world. On top of that, it would be an unparalleled engineering achievement and, I have to believe, a seminal scientific advancement.
Best wishes! (And Wow!)
WaltC
WaltC:
It will be very hard and difficult. Part of the electric energy would supply the energy necessary to the Ecat to work. The implications are enormous. #We do not have it yet, but we are working very hard on it. Some of us is getting no sleep. Theoretically, it is not impossible, as we discovered, or, at least, we think we discovered.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Andra Rossi.
Neri Accornero
July 12, 2019 at 6:34
I asked you a question among the most important.
“If the reaction is a” interaction “of plasma electrons, rather than a nuclear reaction, you should find far fewer obstacles in the production permit and for the home system, given that plasma generators have long been sold for metal processing.”
You did not answer by answering more serious questions.
I live on earth. This is very important to me E-Cat, 10 kW for the home.
Do we have hope?
Thank you for your hard work.
Sorry for the bad language. Google helps me.
Yury Isaev
Engineer
Tyumen, Russia
Yrka:
Neri Accornero is right.
Of course we have hope !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
How many e cats are supplying heat to customers? Are you any closer to a home ecat
Don:
1- enough so far
2- I hope so, but certification is still an issue
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi
This might be of interest to you.
https://phys.org/news/2019-07-scientists-hydrogen-nanovoid-interaction-metals.html
Donald G. Chandler:
Thank you for this interesting link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Can you say which will be the maximum ratio between electricity and heat in case electricity is the main object of demand?
Victor:
We should be able to reach 90% electricity, 10% heat if this will be the demand. Still fighting, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Are you still using the Ecat QX for R&D? Due to the physics in it, I think it is a unique-in-the-world source of information for pure research.
Glenn
Glenn Hornes:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi:
Your publication on researchgate hase reached 29 000 full readings…and counting!
Cheers
Ugo
Ugo:
Stunning.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Just a few questions:
1. Have you already scaled-up the production of heat producing E-cats or are you still assessing/improving the running plants performances?
2. Does the Electric E-cat require considerable changes of the reactor itself, or is it more the control system that needs to change?
And a remark:
Maybe that this invention can also help you to generate electricity in an efficient way: http://news.rice.edu/2019/07/12/rice-device-channels-heat-into-light/
(I assume this invention can also be used to bring the UV level EM radiation of the E-cat to the most efficient frequencies suitable for PV).
Kind regards, Gerard
Gerard McEk:
1. still assessing – improving the working ones
2. this is a very complex issue
3. thank you for the link
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
You stated many times that the E-Cat requires an external power source for safety reasons.
Would the same safety concerns occur with the “Electric E-Cat” you are now doing R&D on?
I wonder what inspired you to consider investing so much time, energy and money toward the direct production of electricity from the E-Cat?
Best of Luck on your R&D. Many you acquire the all the resources you need to successfully complete your task.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Daniel G.Zavela:
In the Ecat SK plasma we have a situation that has a strong potential to eskew the issues we had with the Ecatbefore.
The importance is enormous with the efficiency we expect, that before did not exist.
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Are you still also working to improve the heat production by the Ecat, besides the R&D on the direct plasma electricity production?
Pat:
Yes, of course! We are learning much from the operating Ecats.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments arrived today to other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I noticed you never answer to the guys that disparage you in the blogs: why?
Sam
Samuel Snopek:
Thay do not affect us, on the contrary, their work gives evidence of the fact that they fear us, which gives evidence they recognize our importance. This is the subliminal message that actually they send to the public. Maybe among them there is myself… ( he,he,he )
Warm Regards.
AR.
Hello A. Rossi
You wrote that there is no fusion or fission in the Rossi effect. This means that there is no phenomenon of absorption or expulsion of particles by the nucleus of the atom.
Is it possible that there is a mysterious creation of proton or neutron in the atomic nucleus or neutron / proton transmutations?
A thousand excuses if my question is silly because I am not an atomic physicist
All my respect and wishes for success
Best regards
Raffaele
Raffaele Bongo:
There is nothing misterious. Questions are never silly.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
Fantasies are more than substitutes for unpleasant reality; they are also dress rehearsals, plans. All acts performed in the world begin in the imagination.
Quote Barbara Grizzuti Harrison.
https://youtu.be/hi6s2DdBCwY
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Right.
Warm regards.
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I return to the comment of Neri Accornero: can you give a hint, not superficial, but not too difficult, about what can happen if your effect is not fusion, not fission, not chemical reaction?
Dewey:
Please go to
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
All the references cited here are the same reported in the above mentioned paper.
In [13] a fundamental connection between Aharonov-Bohm equations and an electron model is proposed, starting from a geometric interpretation of the electron wave-function complex phase [6,8,1].
This approach suggests the possibility of efficiently creating electron condensates exploiting the Aharonov-Bohm effect, a phenomenon that shows the dependence of electron wave-function phase from electromagnetic potentials [9].
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is one of the most important papers published in the last 10 years.
Francis Loung:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I read http://www.ingandrearossi.com
Thank you for sharing.
Anonymous:
Thanks to you for reading it,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I think that you have nothing but your fantasy. The Ecat does not exist and the electricity made directly from the plasma is a chimera
Urbano:
Thank you for your opinion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
It seems that the diffusion of your publication on Researchgate is continuing to rise: now close to 28000 full readings and 2000 recommendations and counting!
Carey:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
The plasma shown in the video
http://www.ecatskdemo.com looks definitely like a black body.
Cheers
David
David:
If we take the full spectrum it actually is enough close to a Maxwellian
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea Recently you said that the reaction in the ECAT is not a nuclear fusion, your article on researchgate, more and more read, is not within my reach and I certainly do not ask you for a simplified explanation but I take a reflection that I showed you some time ago. If the reaction is a plasmatic electrons “interaction” and not a nuclear reaction you should find much less obstacles in the authorization for the production also for the home system, given that Plasma generators have long been sold for metal processing. And at this point I ask you if the electrolytic experiments of Fleischmann and Pons and the others who followed them, are also special electronic reactions rather than cold fusion? And consequently does cold fusion exist?
As always congratulations and full speed ahead!
Neri
Neri Accornero:
The reactions are not fusion reactions, but complex particle interactions: I agree upon the fact that my paper is complex, but the matter is complex. You are Physician Prof, it is like to ask you in few and simple words how a heart transpland can be done. The answer unavoidably would be so much superficial to be a nonsense. But I can guarantee that in my effect there are no fusions, nor fissions. Now we are very advanced with the theoretical bases, even if much remains to be studied.
About the F&P electrolisis, I am not able to answer, I can only say that I tried to replicate their open-source technology without being able to obtain an energetic gain.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
If you are only getting hints of direct electricity production from the e-cat in experiments, when your guiding theory says you should get it, do you think the theory needs to change?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
The theory grows up together with the experiments in a dialectic evolution.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi,
I am following your work years since, and I’m astonished by your progress, but now it is time to shoot the engineer and go into production!
Godspeed your work and don’t forget the rest,
Astonish
Astonish:
he,he,he, nice play with the nick.
We are working hard, but I can’t shoot the “engineer”: that’s me !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
When would you lit the cigar for the Electrical Ecat:
1. If the electrical output exceeds the electrical input
2. If the electrical output exceeds 25% of the total output
3. If the electrical output exceeds 50% of the total output
4. Some other goals
I hope you will enjoy this victory soon.
Good luck to you and your team.
Kind regards, Gerard
Gerard McEk:
The answer 1 should give COP infinite. Obviously two cigars are better than 1…and counting.
You have no idea how badly we are working on it. Theoretically we should get it, but so far experimentally we had only hints of it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Did understand well that when you make the spectrometry of all the plasma we saw in
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
you obtain a Maxwellian spectrum of the black body and the calculation of the energy gives the same result because the temperature is lower, but the surface is much bigger ?
M.B.:
Exactly. Both are close to the calorimetris system, as explained in
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Are you already obtaining electricity from the plasma?
JPR:
Yes, but still not cigar.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
on E-Catworld a commentator said that you yourself do not believe to your products because you are continuing to change them: first the Ecat, then the Ecat HT, then the QX, then the SK, now the Leonardo…what’s next?
Cheers
Anonymous:
It is an evolution: we are aiming to the perfect product and we are not far from it.
Avery Ecat’s experience allowed the follow up of a better Ecat.
Warmk Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Yes what I meant is orders for the heat. Because some time ago you stopped accepting orders until issues are fixed.
Regards
Patrick
Patrick Ellul:
True.
Yes, we continue to accept orders.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Are you in a position now to resume taking orders for the E-Cat SK?
Regards
Patrick
Patrick Ellul:
We do not sell the E-Cat, we sell heat to industries where we install the Ecat.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I am impressed with this site, really I am a fan.
Cheers
Maurine Cler:
Thank you for your attention to the work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.roddilivecat.com
to find comments published in other posts,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Heinz Hause:
We are at a very advanced level. We already are able to supply thermal energy, albeit for now in limited areas where we are makinging the technology fit for a massive diffusion.
We are making strong progress for the combined production of heat and electricity directly from the plasma. Our progress is becoming exponential due to the mass of information that we are getting from our work. I understand the anxiety, but consider that our competitors of Hot Fusion with unlimited funds, in the order of tenths of billions, have obtained nothing in seventy years, while in 10 years and without public funding we made enormous progress. I hope to be ready with the direct production of electricity within this year, albeit this is a hope, not a promise. We are working very hard and, again, without external funding.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On Power Engineering July 9 2019 issue:
Renewables Mix Tops 50% for MidAmerican Energy Customers in Iowa
Rod Walton
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
The earth atmosphere is bad also due to the use of fossil fuels, therefore your work is important. When will you be ready for a worldwide diffusion of the Ecat ?
Heinz Sause
Dr Rossi,
I apologize, but most of the discussion about Fusion vs. “something else” ended up going over my head.
If someone listed some notable Nuclear Reactions:
– Elastic Scattering
– Inelastic Scattering
– Capture Reactions
– Spallation
– Induced Gamma Emission
– Alpha decay
– Fission Reactions
– Fusion Reactions (Wikipedia: Two light nuclei join to form a heavier one, with additional particles (usually protons or neutrons) emitted subsequently.)
1) Are you saying that the Nuclear Reactions going on within the E-Cat are not one of the types listed?
2) Or broader, are you saying that the Nuclear Reactions going on within the E-Cat are not any currently recognized Nuclear Reaction Type?
3) If they are an existing NR type, which one(s)?
4) If you believe the E-Cat-Reactions are new, do you currently have succinct labels & descriptors for them?
Before you point me (once again) in the direction of the “long_range_particle_interactions paper” (I’ve read and re-read it many times– especially whenever you assign it to me), I’m hoping that high level labels/descriptors might help me to better see the forest for the trees.
thanks, WaltC
WaltC:
1- no
2- I am not adding further information after the one, very rich, given in my paper cited by you
3-same as in 2
4- yes we have, but they are confidential
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
In past you wrote here that you try to replicate all the systems claimed by your competitors: is this still true?
If yes: do you think some competitor could be able in a couple of years to reach what you did?
Anonymous:
Yes, we try to replicate all the processes we deem worth the job.
I never comment the work of our competitors, but I can say that none of our replications has been considered from us interesting. So far.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Rossi
What do you respond to them who say the graph of the video
http://Www.ecatskdemo.com
Is not a Maxwellian spectrum and therefore you cannot apply the Wien equation ?
Enquirer:
As I explained many times, the spectrometer was focused on the very small surface where we have the highest temperature. Consequently the S in the Boltzmann equation was very limited. If we widen the window and get the whole spectrum, we obtain a Maxwellian. In this case we have a wider surface and the results when we apply the Wien and the Boltzmann equation are very similar, as well as they both are very similar to the corresponding colorimetric measurement, because the S in the Maxwellian spectrum is much wider.
All this is well explained in my paper on Researchgate, that, probably, who made these objections either did not read, or did not understand.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Readers:
please go to http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments in other posts of this blog.
When we will you show industrial important clients?
S.B.:
Soon enough
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi, my name is Emily and i talk in the name of a small company called Xewer who made a device, MagSpark, able to convert part of heat steam into electricity with 20% efficiency.
Xewer would like to organize a jointure with your E-cat to make one solution device to offer electricity from cold fusion.
If you are interested reply to me on my email contact. You find MagSpark information through contact data i filled.
Best Regards
Emily
Emily:
We cannot make a joint venture with your company, but if you send us a proposal with price and description of your device, we will consider it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Der Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find the comments published on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards
A.R.
I envy your work, regards for all the informative posts.
Livia:
You wouldn’t envy should you know how hard it is,
Warm Regaards,
A.R.
How proceeds the R&D on the electricity rirectly tken from plasma?
Ramiro Reitter:
We are working hard. I am very optimist.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
the last numbers from Researchgate:
Full readings 28269, Reserch interest index 700., Recommendtions 2065 ( in 5 months, 7 dys…)
To the next. Cheers
Wilbert Vicenteno:
Unbelievable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Regarding the question of fusion or fission, where you suggested an alternative, and after reading your paper,
1. would it be correct to describe the process as one of “isotope transfer”?
2. Would a starting point of such an “isotope transfer” be looking at all possible transfers that yield a positive or surplus energy output?
Steven N.Karels:
The work I made with Norman Cook and published on Arxiv and now also on Researchgate was based on these hypothesis, the evolution is in my last paper on Researchgate.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Sharp claims PV with 34% efficiency: google
Toyota testing infrared solar roof for electric cars
Warm Regards
Chuck Davis
Chuck Davis:
Interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Ok, sorry, I see now that you already edited the reply. But which part? All three “Ideen” books, or mainly the first one from 1913?
r:/pekka
Pekka Janhunen:
This depends on your patience.
The first one is enough for a non professional.
When I sustained the exam of Theoretical Phylosophy with Prof Paci I had to go through all of them.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I do not find a Hussel work with the exact title you gave. Could you check if the title you gave was correct?
regards, /pekka
Pekka Janhunen:
It was the Italian version of it made by Prof Enzo Paci, eventually I gave the original reference.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Just a link I think is worth to post.
http://sciexplorer.blogspot.com/2014/08/what-is-electron-really.html?m=1
I would love to see a article from you “LENR for dummies” as if I google LENR I see so much rubbish about mentioning cold fusion
I hope you succeed, and become known as Edison 2.0
Kind regards Arjen
Arjen:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
By the way, I like your call for Epoche call, that you make every now and then. Epoche should be exercised also, and in particular, regarding the question that we are asking nature. Forget if the question is new or old, but just think if the question is meaningful and well-posed. Nature is perfect and non-mysterious, just our understanding of it is murky. Our questions are manmade and therefore must be continuously criticised.
regards, /pekka
Pekka Janhunen:
Yes.
Read Edmund Husserl “Ideas For a Pure Phenomenology and for a Phenomenological Phylosophy”.
Probably you speak German, better read it in German language. The translation in English is not perfect, in Italian makes it much more difficult than it already is for itself. But it is a gold mine for the brain.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Well, your plasma must be tenuous, long distance between particles, because otherwise its pressure would be much higher than atmospheric and it would explode. In such plasma, electrons are well approximated by just classical point particles.
The magic of plasma, if it has some, lies in its collective interactions, that is the feedback between the charged particles and the electric and magnetic fields that they generate and in which they move. Plasma, especially when it has a magnetic field, has a much richer set of wavemodes than ordinary gas, which only has sound waves and so-called entropy wave.
The nature of the electron depends on the distance from which one is looking at it. Applies to other objects, too: for example if I look at you from an airplane at 10 km distance, you look like a mass point. Whereas if some insects crawls on your skin, he sees a thicker or thinner forest of body hair.
But why wouldn’t you just make electricity using piece of water-cooled photovoltaic panel trimmed to the wavelengths that the plasma is emitting, or if that is not practical, then transform the wavelengths first to suitable range using fluorescent glass similar to that found in fluorescent lamps.
regards, /pekka
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Have the probabilities to see the Ecat for electricity direct production increased during these last days?
Roberto:
I think so. I am working on it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Did you resolve the problems you hd in the Ecaat SK to make heat?
Abel Renart:
Yes, so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea,
thank you for your quick response about Rossilivecat.com/All. However, it seems ~/All is a function you might not be aware of. ~/All enabled the display of your blog postings since 03/03/2010.
If the history is no longer available with the server modifications, then so be it.
my best,
Buck
Buck:
Understood.
Thank you for the informtion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
You wrote that physics has not yet understood the electron.
Can you tell us, we ignorant of physics, what are the things that are not understood by physics?
I’m sorry if my question is silly.
Always a great support to the entire research team
cordially
Raffaele Bongo
Raffaele Bongo:
For example, the real nature of electron. By the way: Einstein wrote: ” to understand electron means to understand Physics “.
This is the issue I am focused on because from the study of it depends failure or success of the attempt I am making to get electricity directly from the plasma.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buck:
It’s all.html
r:/p.
Buck,
Yes, the “Rossilivecat.com/all” (deep history) functionality seems to be broken at the moment. You can contact the webmaster (very nice person) via the link near the top of the “Rossilivecat.com” page & find out if it’s fixable or not.
WaltC
Good Day Andrea:
a quick question: Rossilivecat.com/all is no longer available. Is this a consequence of your recent changes at the server? Will it be functional again at some point?
regards,
Buck
Buck:
The correct address is:
http://www.rossilivecat.com
It is operative without any problem.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
what do you think of this publication about the electron mass explained with the Higgs Boson mechanism:
https://portal.kph.uni-mainz.de/T/members/meyer/downloads/HiggsHBMeyerSymmetry.pdf
MM:
Yes, I know that paper: if you go to the core of it, you discover that along the philosophy of this paper, the reality of a mountain is not the mountain itself, but its inclination and the related integral. They missed 100% the essence of the electron.
Perhaps, to respect the “symmetry”, this reference could balance:
https://www.amazon.com/Higgs-Fake-Particle-Physicists-Committee/dp/1492176249
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Also Afro-Americans are totally absent from the R&D related to LENR. How do you explain ?
Victor:
We have Afro Americans in our Team and they work excellently. I ignore if it is true what you say, because in the mountains of publications made about LENR it is not, obviously, specified the race. It would be illegal, besides stupid.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Joseph Fine linked a paper on tresinos, also a Compton scale proposition, but with two electrons orbiting a proton, not one. The two electrons can have opposite spins, which reduces the system’s magnetic energy, I would suppose… and the entity has -1 charge so acts like H- ion. Did you look at the tresino concept? I didn’t hear about it earlier.
regards, /pekka
Pekka Janhunen:
Not yet, but Dr Fine is worth to be read.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
“We are in the middle age of physics..”
Not even middle, but muddle age. In my opinion:-)
regards, /pekka
Pekka Janhunen:
I think that the key point is the study and the comprehension of the electron, that has been frozen in a self referential system based on the principle that only what receives funding is real. We need epoche’.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You recently said that you are optimistic about the outcome of the tests of the electric Ecat. Now, we know that you are an optimistic guy, but goes your optimism beyond your hope that it might work? Are there reasons to believe it’s going to work, already?
Great success to you and your team.
Kind regards, Gerard
Gerard McEk:
I am optimist by nature and I sincerely have great hope that it will work reliably maybe within this year.
July, August and September will be months of intense R&D on this issue. I am spending substantial money that speaks for the substantial background of my hopes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is as of today the most read of the 15 million publications of Researchgate, Also the recommendations of your publications (1878 as of today) are unheard of before.
Your work is making a revolution.
Greg:
Are you sure that itis really the most read ? I saw the stats, I continue to be stunned.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I noticed that in the field of LENR women are totally absent: there are not publications of females. How do you explain?
Emilia:
Well, as a matter of fact it is not true in absolute, for example Dr Evelyn Foschi, a physicist from the University of Bologna, has coauthored publications about LENR, but in general you are right, the presence of women is low. I am not able to answer why, I do not see any reason for this fact.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
Nice to see you clarify the situation on cold fusion and LENR.
Obviously, the fusion of nuclei can only work at very high energies, as occurs into stars or accelerators, with neutrons production as unavoidable consequence. The alchemists of the Middle Ages have all failed to turn metals into gold because they do not have the knowledge of atomic structure and involved energies.
You do not measure any neutrons from the E-cat, so it can not be a fusion reaction, you’re absolutely right. On the other hand, you get isotopic shifts (Nickel if i remember well), which means in one way or another a neutrons transfer, and that at a relatively low temperature: do you agree?
Regards,
Michel
Michel:
Your comment is intelligent, albeit I must in part disagree with you: I think that, speaking of Physics, we are still in a Middle Age and, as a consequence of this fact, our alchemists have made much better than turning vile iron into gold: look at the guys that have sold toilet paper, with written clowneries like “electron capture”, for millions, with “auditors” granting them billion dollars value of their shares value and using pop clowns like “guide fishes” to cheat on their investors: they turned toilet paper into gold !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S. We are still in the Middle Age of Physics, because the Standard Model did not understand what is an electron, while Albert Einstein said ” we will understand Physics when we will understand electrons”.
Steven N. Karels,
In both Fusion and Fission the reaction products will have a different atomic number, either greater than before (Fusion) or less than before (Fission). If the Atomic Number remains the same, one isotope of an element might be transformed into an isotope of the same element and the Atomic Number remains the same.
Here is an example of the change in Total Binding Energies between Fe-56 and Fe-58.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=What+are+the+binding+energies+of+Fe-56+and+Fe-58%3F&assumption=%7B%22DPClash%22,+%22IsotopeP%22,+%22binding+energies%22%7D+-%3E+%7B%22TotalBindingEnergy%22%7D
Then, there may also be Tresino reactions which have been theorized, but not yet confirmed.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1419.pdf
Hope that helps,
Joseph Fine
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I have difficulty with your limited answer and I suspect others might also have questions and/or are experiencing confusion.
I understand there are two primary ways of deriving energy from the nucleus – fission and fusion. I suspect you are concerned with protecting your confidential business secrets and that is fine and understandable.
But the implication that I would draw from your comment is that the reaction is fission which cannot be the correct answer because of the low atomic number of the ingredients.
Confused,
Steve
Steven N. Karels:
There are other nuclear interactions, besides fusion and fission.
See also
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On Power Engineering July 2 2019:
G 20 still spending big on keeping alive coal coal-fired power
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the info,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You posted “There are no fusions.” Could you please clarify:
1. Are you saying no hydrogen-hydrogen fusion occurs?
2. Are you saying no hydrogen combines with lithium forming another isotope occurs?
3. Are you saying no hydrogen-nickel combination occurs?
4. Are you saying something else?
Steven N. Karels:
I said what I said: there are not fusions.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Do you think that certifications depend on th power and the money is put on the stakes ?
Chuck Davis:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
does the Ecat modulate the emission of energy based on the demand?
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
Dr Rossi:
1- Did you detect helium out of the interactions inside the Ecat?
2- Did you try to find helium?
Fedor Buchakchiysky:
1- not beyoud any doubt: too close to the background
2- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Are you still also working on an R&D to couple the Ecat with turbines?
Anonymous:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
are you still open to install your plants to sell heat, or the R&D on the direct production of electricity has caused you to severe such activity?
Darron Perks:
Of course yes !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
What do you answer to them that say your technology does not work because nobody has been able to replicate it with the efficiency you declare? Many replications have been made successfylly, but none even close to your results.
Thank you if you can answer
Kip
Kip McDade:
Coca Cola never disclosed its formula and nobody has been ever able to replicate its flavor. Does this mean that Coca Cola does not exist ?
Coca Cola consumers ( like me ) don’t give a damn about not knowing its formula, as well as our Clients buy energy and are not interested to our know how.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Have you found with the spectrometer also a “bell curve” typical of a black body Maxwellian?
Jorge:
Yes, of course, the plasma is a black body. If we make the spectrometer see the whole of it, we get a Maxwellian, but in the video we focused on the hottest point. The energy calculated is the same, because the wavelength is longer, but the surface is wider.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
What is the latest news from your latest experiments to produce direct electricity from the E-Cat?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
We have made better than before. I am optimistic. Still much work to do, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
For today and tomorrow no more comments will be published in this blog: the silence is intended to be in honour of Prof Norman D. Cook
Andrea Rossi
Prof Joseph Fine:
I am a man of Faith.
Prof Norman Cook, I am sure, is going to work for God at a superior level than we still are.
Humanly, I can only express my deepest condolences to his Family.
He was a great man and a great Professor. His students in the USA and in Japan loved him and they are lucky, because to have a master like him is a fortune.
He will pass to the History of Physics for his model of the atom’s nucleus, that has inspired and will inspire generations of scientists.
I owe him a great part of my know how. I read his book innumerable times. I know it by heart. See you, Norman, now you play in the Majors ( I mean, in Champions League ), while we are still here, fighting for Him.
Your friend for ever,
Andrea
Hello DR Rossi
Have you heard this sad news?
https://e-catworld.com/2019/06/27/norman-cook-dies/
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Oh, my God ! No, no, I did not hear about this before now.
I am very sad of the departure of one of the most honest and intelligent men I ever met in my life.
It is a substantial loss for the LENR world and for the Science. His intelligence and preparation was directly proportional to his modesty.
Andrea Rossi
Dear Andrea:
Your publication on Researchgate reached 27000 full readings today!
Jannette Herbold,
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
How are going the experiments in California with the Ecat SK Leonardo?
Dave:
Promising.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi and Readers,
As you probably know, Dr. Norman D. Cook recently passed away on June 14th after a long illness. Could you discuss his contributions to the theory of LENR and the “Rossi Effect” and any other recollections you could share about him?
http://www.infinite-energy.com/resources/norman-cook.html
Would you consider naming the next or a future generation of E-Cats after him?
Thank you,
Joseph Fine
I noticed that your paper
http://www.rereachgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and the video
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
grow up together in number of readings and views respectively: clearly they are watched together.
Cheers
Noe
Noe Mihalios:
I agree and I think the success of the paper has been born by the coherence with the experiment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
The experiments and the plants and apparatuses that you have developed in these last ten years are an intellectual patrimony unique in the woeld and probably of inestimable value: will you be able to transfer all this to others? Have you collected all your papers?
Thank you if you can answer,
Pierre
Pierre:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:Do you consider your effect a cold fusion?
Christophe:
No. There are no fusions.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
In your research of LENR,
1. have you found any differences between protium versus deuterium as a fuel?
2. Any evidence of helium production?
Steven N. Karels:
1- yes
2- very difficult to know
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ha Ha Ha
Dear Andrea:
In the house organ forum the trolls of IH are saying that the stunning success of your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
has been bought from you paying persons to click! Surely they do not know, or pretend not to know, that it is impossible, because the statistics on Researchgate are made only by registered scientists and researchers that put their face, because when they click the algorithm of Researchgate checks the authorship and the same person is not counted more than once. But Rossi is Rossi, and with Rossi also the impossible can be possible, so, please, confess: how much did you pay to obtain in less than 5 months 26800 full readings, 1737 recommendations, 572.5 index of research interest and counting ? How much costed to you to cherry-pick 26800 persons in hundreds of universities and labs all around the world? And how much money to each of them had you to give to force them a recommendation? Confess!
Fernando
Fernando:
Paid 4 billion dollars.
Got a financing from Woodford.
In IH shares.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
can you tell us if during the R&D on course you reached the expected electrical output level (let’s say more than 5 KW electric) for a duration of:
a) a few seconds
b) a few minutes
c) a few hours
d) a few days
e) never
Thanks a lot for what you are doing,
Riccardo
Rick57:
Premature to answer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hey, Andrea!
Update of your stats on Researchgate: full readings 26750, recommendations 1737, research interest index 592.5 !
Note that the recommendations and the research interest index are made by professors and researchers that put their face and, as I saw, they are from every part of the world’s universities and laboratories. This is some peer reviewing !
The readers also should know that Researchgate is written by 15 millions scientists that write their publications on it and compose the statistics of every publication. This makes very important the success of your paper.
Jeffrey:
I found right now on Researchgate this publication, written by Dr Donald Reed, that I recommend for its ingenuity:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/333977851_unravelling_the_potentials_puzzle_and_corresponding_case_for_the_scalar_longitudinal_electrodynamic_wave
It is perfectly resonant with the revolution on course of which our experiments are bearing evidence.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
So far have you noticed any improvements in the E-Cat SK Leonardo, following modifications you have made?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
We are working on it. In a week I will have results. I have worked hard on the modifications, I am optimistic. This said, as usual, much od perspiration follows inspiration.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
How is going the experiment with the Ect SK-Leonardo for direct generation of electricity?
C.:
Today I am in California continuing the experiment after the modifications of the prototype.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
It is extremely interesting the peak at 437.2 nm in the graph of the spectrometer in http://www.ecatskdemo.com
Lars:
Yes, it is important, as explained in
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
New issue of Power Engineering June 25 2019: Peabody, Arch form joint venture to make coal competitive against gas and renewables,
Rod Walton
Rod Walton,
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
All the 4 theoretical lines explained on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
seem to be to be a logic concatenation wherein they are all linked in a synergy: am I correct?
All the best,
RR
Roberto Ridolfi:
You can say that,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Watching http://www.ecatskdemo.com I noticed the neutron detectors: have you ever detected neutrons emitted from the Ecat SK?
Thanks if you can answer,
Noemi
Noemi Session:
We never detected ionizing radiations, nor neutrons.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The Zitterbewegung effect that is the core of the theoretical work in your paper on Researchgate consists in the vibrations made at the speed of light by electrons that move much slower, like a tennis ball that moves toward you slowly, but vibrates at a much higher speed, correct?
Roby:
That’s why I can’t get it !!! It is a false slow !!! ( Nice model, though ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Short update about your stats on Researchgate:
full readings 26300, research interest index 572.9, recommendations 1685…and counting!
Reporter:
Stunning.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
if the current test is successful the field of application of the Ecat grows up exponentially !
We are holding our collective breath in anticipation of success !
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
Chuck Davis:
Not that I am aware of.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
I HAVE BEEN INFORMED NOW THAT THERE ARE AROUND PERSONS THAT SAY THEY CAN COLLECT FUNDS ON OUR BEHALF TO FINANCE US OR TO BUY OUR PLANTS OR TO HAVE A PRIORITY IN THE WAITING LIST: ATTENTION! THIS IS A FRAUD ! WE HAVE AUTHORIZED NOBODY TO SELL OUR LICENCE OR TO COLLECT FUNDS ON OUR BEHALF !!! IF SOMEBODY CONTACTS YOU IN THIS DIRECTION, PLEASE CONTACT US GIVING US HIS ADDRESS: WE WILL IMMEDIATELY INFORM YOU IF HE IS A REGULAR LICENSEE OR A FRAUDSTER,
WARM REGARDS,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
I read many times
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and watched in parallel
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
and the more times I read and watch, the more I understand the genial background and synergy of those two publications. I’m not surprised that your paper is the most read nuclear physics publication of the world.
Godspeed,
JPR
JPR:
I read now my stats on Researchgate:
full readings 26095
research interest index 565.6
recommendations 1658 ( !!!!! These are peer reviewings !!!)
Unbelievable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
How many probabilities you think are there that your quest for electricity can be obtained by the ecat enough to make it work with a surplus?
Jimmy Dewis:
51%
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Maybe Tecogen can be a commercial partner of yours, see here:
httpa://finviz.com
Karl Poehlmann:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You do not need infinite COP for a commercial success, 50-60 COP is enough.
Kind Regards,
Viktor
Viktor Shipachev:
You are right.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
The thermal E-Cat has no moving mechanical parts.
Is it the same think for the electric Leonardo E-Cat?
All my wishes for the success of the E-Cat Leonardo R & D
Best regards and good tennis for Sunday
Raffaele
Raffaele Bongo:
Thank you for the success wishes for the Ecat SK Leonardo: here are no mechanical parts also in the Ecat that should generate directly current and there is hope of success;
thank you also for your wishes of goods in tennis, but in this case there is no hope.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels,
One could argue that a multi-billion dollar business would be crazy not to take out an “insurance policy” for any technology that had the potential to seriously disrupt their business– in other words invest in buying & understanding & researching LENR.
BUT, in strong agreement with your point, Clayton Christensen (“The Innovator’s Dilemma …” for those who haven’t read it, wikipedia has a nice summary) says that, by and large, dominant companies are often the least likely to have the interest or ability to investigate potential disruptive technology. Part of Clayton’s observations is that dominant industries are so intent on remaining dominant vs their peers (big-electricity, in this case), that’s where they focus all their R&D dollars. They are unlikely to take some of those dollars away from their big source of income and retarget it on something that’s seen to be, in the short term, a minor business.
As a point of interest– One of the examples that Clayton gives is horse drawn vehicles not feeling threatened by hand-made luxury cars, but later losing out to the Model-T, mass produced car.
Dear Andrea,
Considering Mizuno’s system with palladium coated nickel, everything else remaining the same, what general result would you expect if hydrogen (of the normal isotopic ratio) was utilized instead of deuterium?
Thank you!
Beerus:
Sorry, I never comment the work of our competitors.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
In the USA are on course the celebrations for the moon landing half century ago: do you think the Ecat SK Leonardo could be an achievement of the same importance?
Dana
Dana:
If we (our Team) will be able to make the Ecat SK Leonardo 100% self sustaining, able to feed itself without necessity of external power source, obtaining infinite COP, yes. But it is still a dream, we are close, but not cigar yet. We are working very hard to realize this dream.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
here are your stats today on Researchgate:
full readings 26000 (!!!)
research interest index: 555.5 (!!!)
recommendations: 1631 (!!!)
After 5 months (!!!)
I think you are the N.1 out of 15 millions. The average numbers for good publications are, respectively, 200, 10 and 10, after years.
BB
Berenice Beckham:
Unbelievable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nils Fryklund
Why would a power company use an unproven and controversial new power source when nuclear, oil, coal, wind, solar and natural gas are available? Why would they take the risk to be the first power company to commit millions of dollars in a new installation based on an unproven technology? If eCat technology works and is adaptable to electric power generation, it will be through a small scale test project, where risk of lost dollars is minimal.
Dear Andrea!
After all the demos you have done, has not any power companies been taking contact and wished to lease an E-catSK for test, before they start to build up new nuclear-, oil-, coal- or windpowerinstallations?
1. In that case, one or more?
2. Any wellknown big powercompany?
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Nils Fryklund:
Not yet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
How are the SK reactors installed with your early pioneer customers performing these days? Have you been able to solve the problems that you said you had been experiencing?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Yes, we are working well with them so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
1. In the eCat SK Electric, are you using magnets to cause charged particles to rotate in the magnetic field?
2. Are you using a coil or similar structure to extract the particle’s kinetic energy to convert it to electrical energy?
3. Do you need to convert the recovered electrical energy into a useful waveform (DC or AC voltsage and current)?
4. Considering the required conversions necessary to produce useable electricity, will you achieve efficiencies better than that of a more conventional Carnot cycle approach?
5. If successful with the eCsat SP Electric, will the major energy output of the eCat SK Electric be electricity or is the electricity a secondary product to heat generation?
Steven N. Karels:
1- I cannot answer to this kind of questions in positive or in negative
2- see point 1
3- yes
4- premature to answer, we are still at an R&D stage
5- we should be able to decide either solution, depending on the demand of the Clients
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations for the increased Researchgate publicity. Just some consideration. You are not yet world-famous, but in case you will be, since it is hard to predict how publicity develops. There are many examples of good people who have risen from neglicence to fame, and then fallen because they could not handle it. Being famous is a test of a person’s psychological strength, and it can be harder to withstand than being neglected. That said, honestly it seems to me that you have the strength of personality that is needed to handle fame, including that you do not take yourself too seriously and can laugh to yourself, although at the same time you take your duty& work very seriously. But one never knows. It can be a devilish thing & no one has infinite strength. I’m not suggesting to do anything differently, just giving my perspective of the situation…
Best regards, /pekka
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for your consideration. As a matter of fact, I do not take seriously myself, but I fight to death for the seriousness of the work of my Team. We believe in what we are doing.
What counts is only the result of our work, all the rest is written in the sand. The attention in Researchgate toward my paper is not given from my name: I have published other papers on Researchgate, but those papers got an average attention. The incredible success has been achieved only by http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and this means that what counts is not my name, but what I wrote, that. obviously, has been considered useful. Nobody would read that paper, that is difficult to digest, unless he consider it useful. To read my paper is a work, not a leisure.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Are you making use of superconductors in the Ecat SK Leonardo to make electricity directly from the plasma?
Thanks if you can answer,
Emily
Emily Richel:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
DR Joseph Fine:
Thank you for the correction,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi, Modestino
The link to the paper by ‘Tadahiko Mizuno & Jed Rothwell’ does not work properly.
‘Increased Excess Heat from Palladium Deposited on Nickel’ – that was posted by Modestino doesn’t work.
The following link should work.
(tiny.url was used to shorten the url length to minimize errors.
https://preview.tinyurl.com/y2mm4v9f
Sustaining Regards,
Joseph Fine
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I saw here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/researchgate
that Researchgate has 15 millions of papers. Your paper is in the 1st 1% of the most read, but with the numbers you reached today I think you are in the top 10:
full readings 25748
research interest index 543.6
Recommendations 1575
With these numbers you are in the top of the top and for a LENR based paper, with the general hostility toward this matter, you made cultural revolution. Actually, your paper is very difficult to read, so it is unbelievable that you collected these results, because means that you intercepted the strong interest of all the field of the scientists and researchers of this field. This success of yours is important in this period.
Strong congrats
A.Y.
Adella Yoshi:
Every day I read the stats on Researchgate and everyday I get stunned.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
After your publication http://www.researchgate.ner/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions the replication of your effect are multiplying:
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/mizunotincreasede.pdf
Modestino:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers,
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com to find comments published today in other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Have you been interviewed about the Woodford-IH mess?
Kirby:
I have been contacted from many journalists, but refused any interview.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof Rossi,
How do you calculate the rest mass of a photon?
Perry:
1- I AM NOT A PROF
2- a photon cannot have a rest mass, because it cannot be stationary relative to any inertial reference frame. A photon is always moving at the speed of light relative to any reference frame.
Warm Regards,
A.R.