Rossi Blog Reader

This website tracks recent postings to Andrea Rossi's Journal of Nuclear Physics, sorting the entries with priority to Rossi's answers, which appear under each question.

• Need more context? We also have Rossi's entire blog on a single page.
• Email to Andrea Rossi - Journal Of Nuclear Physics
• Website comments to the Webmaster (who has no contact or connection with Rossi).
• Updated: 2016-05-24 09:40:06.507203Z

  1. James Santiago

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    I am following your work since 2011, when you introduced the E-Cat together with Prof. Sergio Focardi in the University of Bologna. I am really inspired by your huge work, your perseverance and resiliency against any adversity.
    Waiting for my E-Cat…
    Regards,
    James

  2. Andrea Rossi

    James Santiago:
    Thank you for your kind attention to the work of my Team.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  3. Sebastian

    Dear Andrea,

    I presume the ERV measured pressure of the vapor that exited the 1MW e-cat?

    Thanks

  4. Andrea Rossi

    Sebastian:
    I presume you keep your eyes open while you drive your car ?
    Thanks,
    A.R.
    P.S.
    Please do not make other questions related to the measurements made by the ERV: I cannot disclose further information about this issue before the report is disclosed in Court.

  5. Luis Navarro

    Dear Andrea,
    The latest from http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
    Digging Deep Into the Dunghill of Dewey Weaver Deceptions and Lies!

    Posted on 2016/05/23
    Best regards
    Luis

  6. Andrea Rossi

    Luis Navarro:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  7. Sebastian

    Dear Andrea,

    Given the information that you gave recently (thank you!), it seems to me that power calculation would be very simple.
    Chers,
    Sebastian

  8. Andrea Rossi

    Sebastian:
    The power calculation was surely simple for a nuclear engineer expert of nuclear power plants as the ERV is. To teach to him how to make the calorimetry of a boiler is naif, at the least.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  9. Drew G.

    If the assumptions of political plots are groundless, were you aware of Darden and Vaughn’s visits to the White House to meet with the President, White House staffers and Energy Department Officials? See the following URL for meeting details:

    http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/more-industrialheat-whitehouse-connections-agw-agenda-tech-policy-and-national-security/#comment-28170

  10. Andrea Rossi

    Drew G.:
    I had seen the papers related to the 2012 meeting. Now, this is interesting.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  11. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  12. Stephen

    Dear Andrea,

    I’m really glad you invented and made the e-cat quark-x, the light it makes and its potential hope must be something beautiful in these times. This is a special gift I think, for all of us someday but especially now for you.

    I’m very much looking forward to reading Vessela’s book, I hope it is released in English soon.

    I pray it works out as the good all hope.

  13. Andrea Rossi

    Stephen:
    Thank you for your kind sustain.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  14. Johnny

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    How is today out QuarkX ?
    Cheers,
    Johnny

  15. Andrea Rossi

    Johnny:
    Very good, still very promising.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  16. Gennady

    Dear Andrea Rossi.

    I wanted to follow up on the question I asked a month or so ago regarding the scalability of Quark X 1 MW. You mentioned that it can be scaled, such as half the size, 1/10th the size and so on.

    1. Will it produce heat proportional to the scale?
    2. Does COP remain constant, independent of the scale? (COP number was thrown around at 20+?)
    3. Since you are not ready to give us an answer on the ratio for heat to electrical conversion, can one assume a worse case scenario of 50%?

    Kind regards,

    Gennady

  17. Andrea Rossi

    Gennady:
    1- yes
    2- yes
    3- this datum will be published after the completion of the R&D on course.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  18. Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I have a question concerning the cost of electric power. Today the cost for the suppliers to provide their customers with electric power are in the range between 3.8 euro cents up to 21.5 euro cents per KW/h depending on the source (coal, oil, nuclear, renewable etc.). Could you approximately estimate the cost for one KW/h electric power (or provide me with a factor) out of ECAT technology that is produced as autarky local energy, for example in a CHP station in the basement, excluding the investment costs for the purchase of ECAT hardware.

    All the best
    Uwe Doms

  19. Andrea Rossi

    Uwe Doms:
    Too soon to answer.
    I will giove this information when the preliminar R&D on course will have been terminated.
    Thank you for your attention,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  20. Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Hello dr . Rossi:
    I send you the link of the second edition of the good book of Vessela Nikolova:

    “Vessela Nikolova: Dear Readers, it gives me great pleasure to announce the publication of the extended version of my book, ‘E-Cat The New Fire – The Biography of Andrea Rossi’, which you will find for sale on Amazon, both in digital and paper format, for the moment in Italian, but very soon also in English.”

    http://www.amazon.it/E-Cat-Il-Nuovo-Fuoco-Biografia/dp/8894003280/

    “Scientific truth is not a majority decision” (Galileo Galilei)

    http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com/blog/

  21. Andrea Rossi

    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
    Thank you for te link.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  22. Sebastian

    Dear Andrea,

    I have a hypothesis for where that whole 100.1 degrees C could come from.

    Given that the ERV only considered vaporisation for the COP , he used a dummy temperature output value of 100.1C. Possibly he used 99.9C as input temperature. Possibly there is an entire column full of 100.1C in the data. The title of the column is probably “output temperature used for COP calculation”. Possibly Penon didn’t remove that value from maintenance days.

    Most likely there is another column of data with the actual output temperature.

    I think some people at IH didn’t read the report closely and, instead of reading with an open mind, they looked for discrepancies.

    The 100.1C column must have looked a bit weird, but it makes perfect sense to me.

    Am I close to the truth?

    Thanks

  23. Andrea Rossi

    Sebastian:
    The 100.1 temperature is just a clownesque invention, nothing else. It simply does not belong to the Report.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  24. Dear Mr. Rossi,

    If I took 40 ounces of nickel powder (99.999% pure) mixed with 4 ounces of pure lithium powder, heated the mixture to 500 degrees C for two hours, then mixed in 4 ounces of potassium carbonate and two ounces of fine carbon powder, then put the entire mixture into a heavy steel Dewar for two days under complete vacuum, and then added hydrogen gas to the Dewar at two atmospheres, and then added a little heat, would there be a reaction? Is there a critical mass of nickel powder at which reactions are easier to start but more difficult to control? There is a rumor on the Internet of a similar experiment (simpler without my added details) using 40 ounces of nickel and hydrogen gas (without any heat added) that created so much unexplained spontaneous heat that the 300 pound Dewar glowed orange (800C) and the nickel powder melted into a solid mass.

    Do you think this is all just an Internet rumor, or could it be possible? The idea that using a larger mass of nickel powder might change the potential for reaction interests me and has some theoretical credibility.

    You can email me if you don’t want this discussion public.

    Sincerely, Christopher Calder

  25. Andrea Rossi

    Christopher Calder:
    I am not able to answer, but always curious of replications when they are reported.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  26. Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    The only way to continue your work is to start production before your opponents and political favors that are traded in the USA government are used to stop you … I think you have enough faith in God and in yourself to take this first step after your upcoming successful important meeting in June.

    “In God we Trust”?

    Tom

  27. Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    I think all these assumptions of political plots are simply groundless.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  28. Dear Andrea,

    What is your opinion on the governmental system outlined in “The Republic” by Plato?

    Faithfully yours

    Rip

  29. Andrea Rossi

    Rip Van Winkle:
    That would be perfect, but is an utopia. Still valid as a model, though.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  30. LookMoo

    Dear Mr Rossi,

    If you read the court documents (your law suite) and your view on IH actions (or lack thereof) you notice that IH’ s action often goes hand-in-hand with IH meetings in Washington with policy makers and political advisers (of course this is only the tip of the iceberg as records of emails and phone calls have yet to surfaced).

    Mr. Mats Lewan wrote before these record surfaced,.. that there was no sign of political interference in the process.

    What do you think??

  31. Andrea Rossi

    LookMoo:
    I think there is not political interference.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  32. Hank Mills

    Dear Andrea,

    Can you give us a range of temperature for the super heating without providing exact figures?

    For example, was the output steam always at least 110C or higher? 105C or higher?

  33. Andrea Rossi

    Hank Mills:
    I cannot disclose data of the report before it is disclosed in Court.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  34. Patrick Ellul

    Dear Andrea,
    Are you saying that you were generous and conservative enough to just account for the latent heat of vaporisation as the output energy? And even less an arbitrary 10%?

    The enthalpy of vaporization, (symbol ∆Hvap) also known as the (latent) heat of vaporization or heat of evaporation, is the energy (enthalpy) that must be added to the substance, typically a liquid, to transform a quantity of that substance into a gas.

    Best regards,
    Patrick

  35. Andrea Rossi

    Patrick Ellul:
    Not me, the ERV did this.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  36. Vessela Nikolova

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Complimenting what you are doing with the tenacity that distinguishes you and sure that justice will finally triumph, I would like to inform you that it is just available on AMAZON the second updated edition of my book ” E-Cat The new Fire – The biography of Andrea Rossi “.
    Now it is a paper book and also an E-book for Kindle. For the moment both are only in Italian language.
    Here below are the links to the two versions:

    Paper book:
    http://www.amazon.it/E-Cat-Il-Nuovo-Fuoco-Biografia/dp/8894003280/

    E-book:
    https://www.amazon.it/Cat-Il-Nuovo-Fuoco-Biografia-Andrea-ebook/dp/B01FSZXZI0

    I am also preparing the English version, which will be ready soon.
    Greetings to you and all the Readers of the JoNPVessela Nikolova

    P.S. I made a new post on my blog
    http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com/blog/

  37. Andrea Rossi

    Vessela Nikolova:
    I read again your book: very nice: this second edition is really more complete than the first one .
    Again good luck !
    A.R.

  38. Oystein Lande

    Dear Mr Rossi,

    I’m sorry. Was just curious of what principles were used. We will wait for later then.

    About your answer to Sebastian:

    Does this imply that heating was done in stages?
    I mean one core was boiling water and the next was superheating the steam from boiler section?

  39. Andrea Rossi

    Oystein Lande:
    It’s ok, thanks for your comprehension.
    The circuit was complex, but yes, the steam was superheated.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  40. Sebastian

    Dear Andrea,

    Thank you for your response earlier today. It clarifies things a bit.

    I do have one more question:

    You told Mats Lewan that to be conservative, the ERV ignored the energy corresponding to heating the inflowing cooled water (at about 60˚C) to boiling temperature.

    Did the ERV also ignore the energy corresponding to heating the vaporized water to temperatures above boiling point?

    Thank you!

  41. Andrea Rossi

    Sebastian:
    Good question. Yes, the ERV ignored also the energy spent to heat the steam above the boiling point, as well as the energy necessary to raise the temperature of the water from circa 60-70 °C to the boiling point, to be conservative.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  42. DvH

    Hello Mr Rossi,

    most international readers of this blog may not know the details of american law-system. What kind of procedure is it?
    Greetings
    dvh

  43. Andrea Rossi

    DvH:
    My attorney reccommended to me not to disclose the Report of the ERV before its disclosure in Court, because it should be uncorrect. For obvious reasons, I comply.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  44. Bernie

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    It is very interesting to follow your progress with the QuarkX,along with following the story with IH and the lawsuit. Because LENR can be considered a disruptive technology I am sure it is in the best interest of many to stay aware of all you do. Can you tell us about contacts (if any) you have had with President Obama, Military officials, NASA, Wall street bankers etc..
    Thanks
    Bernie Morrissey

  45. Andrea Rossi

    Bernie:
    No.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  46. Luis Navarro

    Dear Andrea and fellow followers of JONP,
    What previous post by Robert Dorr refers to is this article http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/are-industrialheat-and-darden-executing-a-apcowhitehousegs-agenda-to-slow-down-lenr-blackswan-break-through-since-2012/
    Regards
    Luis

  47. Andrea Rossi

    Luis Navarro:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  48. Oystein Lande

    Dear mr Rossi,

    Did you see my question on steam quality?

    Was it measured?

  49. Andrea Rossi

    Oystein Lande:
    Let me repeat another time: I cannot disclose even parts of the Report of the ERV before it is disclosed in Court. All I can say is that the measurements have been made by a nuclear engineer expert of nuclear power plants, certifications and validations. Do you think we ( or you ) have to explain to him how to measure the energy consumed and the energy produced by a boiler during one year ?
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  50. Dear Andrea,

    trhe Sunday edition, about LENR doors of my blog,
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-22-2016-other-doors-to-lenr.html

    More important than it seems a la prima vista/first sight,

    best,
    Peter

  51. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  52. Sebastian

    Dear Andrea,

    Could you tell us if the output temperature of the 1MW plant was indeed 100.1 degrees C?

    This is the value that the IH people have been posting on the forums, so if you could confirm/deny, it would be helpful.

    Many thanks!

  53. Andrea Rossi

    Sebastian:
    No, the value of 100.1 has been invented by the usual clowns.
    I repeat that I cannot disclose the data of the Report of the ERV before it is disclosed in Court.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  54. DvH

    Hello Mr Rossi,

    a few days ago (16th may) Frank Acland asked for some confirmation about the measurents during THE TEST : he asked and you confirmed that fluid flow and deltaT was measured to get the generated heat.
    Obviously electric input energy was also measured and logged…
    Did you measure fluid pressure at container inlet and at container outlet ? you know – as Shakespeare said: STEAM OR NO STEAM – THAT IS THE QUESTION ! if the customer (JM) REQUIRED HOT WATER, then you must take care to AVOID steam. If the customer REQUIRED STEAM, then you must avoid WATER.
    How was that done ?
    greetings
    dvh

  55. Andrea Rossi

    DvH:
    As you know, I cannot disclose the data of the ERV Report before it is disclosed in Court.
    Obviously the measurements necessary to calculate the energy output and the energy input have been made.
    I repeat that such measurements have been made by a nuclear engineer expert of nuclear power plants.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  56. Robert Dorr

    Andrea,

    I was just wondering if you had seen the newly found information that Tom Darden met with President Obama in January 2012 shortly before he contacted you in early 2012?

    Thank you for your hard work.

    Robert Dorr

  57. Andrea Rossi

    Robert Dorr:
    Yes, I saw it, but it was much time before we met, therefore surely LENR were not in his mind at that time, as I know. I am surprised he asked to meet the President, because I always talked very well to him of the President Obama, that I consider one of the most courageous and illuminated Presidents of the History of this Great Country, while Darden always was dismissive about the issue, and used to say that the President Obama is a “communist”.
    Not surprisingly, opportunism won versus sincerity.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  58. Andrea Rossi

    Vessela Nikolova:
    Thank you for your information and the links of it to the new edition of your book.
    I already read it: it is a new edition that contains very interesting updates: congratulations for finding them.
    GOOD LUCK !!!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  59. Luis Navarro

    Dear Andrea,
    There is a very informative and helpful LENR daily newsletter provided by Torkel at http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
    which I find highly informative and helpful in looking for up-to-date news for LENR. I would like to bring it to the attention of your readers as I am sure they will find as informative as I do. All you have to do is supply your name and email address.
    See also: http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/prime-internet-real-estate-lenr-com-is-now-a-property-of-hydro-fusion/
    Things are hotting up !
    Best regards
    Luis

  60. Andrea Rossi

    Luis Navarro:
    Thank you for the links,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  61. Bob

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,

    Can we have an update about the F8 ?
    Regards,
    Bob

  62. Andrea Rossi

    Bob:
    Today, Sunday May 22, she is working well and still very promising.
    F8.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  63. Seymour

    Dr Rossi:
    your strategy is the best possible: stay away from chatters and focus on the E-Cat in the market. No chatter, no slander will be able to stop your E-Cat, once it will be massively in the market.
    Godspeed,
    Seymour

  64. Andrea Rossi

    Seymour:
    Thank you for your attention to the work of our Team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  65. Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    You mentioned that your R&D includes stability, safety, start/stop procedures and efficiency tasks for the Quark that you need to complete. Anything to add?

    Will this R&D be over before the important test with the potential customer/partner in June? (F8)

    You have been given vision that no man has ever had. We appreciate you sharing your journey with us. Thank you if you can inform us for this update, I know you updated us on May 12, 16 about these items.
    May your journey continue to be guided by deep insight,

    Tom

  66. Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    Yes, I hope by that date the preliminar R&D will be completed ( F8 ).
    Thank you for your attention and sustain.
    By the way, I am working with her right now while I’m answering to uou and she is good.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  67. Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Allow me to expand the question. Do you currently believe that the QuarkX technology can competitively be the source of energy to generate commercial electrical power as would be required to either be a source of electrical power for the grid or as a source of electrical power to support local electrical needs (such as appliances, lights, computers. etc.).

    If yes, do you believe this would be accomplished through the thermal output, the electrical output or both outputs of the QuarkX technology?

  68. Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Too soon to answer.
    F8.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  69. Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Hello Dr. Rossi: take a look to this latest information about Tom Darden and Cherokee:

    Fees, Fees and More Fees:
    How Private Equity Abuses Its Limited Partners and U.S. Taxpayers
    By Eileen Appelbaum and Rosemary Batt*
    May 2016

    SEC Enforcement
    Despite the mounting evidence of private equity abuses and potentially illegal behavior, SEC enforcement actions have been minimal, with only six actions against PE general partners between 2014 and 2016. In 2014, the SEC targeted two small private equity firms — Lincolnshire Management and Clean Energy Capital — for infractions that were relatively minor. In 2015, KKR paid $30 million to settle an enforcement action for misallocating expenses in failed buyout deals; Blackstone paid $39 million to settle charges of improper fee allocation; Fenway Partners paid modest fines for failing to share fee income with investors; and Cherokee Investment Partners paid minimal fines for inappropriate expense charges. The SEC allowed the PE firms in these cases to pay fines with no admission of guilt.

    SEC Enforcement
    After Andrew Bowden’s shocking “sunshine” speech detailing private equity firms’ abuses of fee income, enforcement action was slow to follow — with only six actions brought between the spring of 2014 and 2016. In 2014, the SEC targeted two small private equity firms — Lincolnshire Management and Clean Energy Capital — for infractions that were relatively minor. More serious cases were filed in 2015, when the SEC brought enforcement actions against KKR, three Blackstone Group funds, Fenway Partners, and Cherokee Investment Partners

    Also in November 2015, the SEC settled an enforcement action against Cherokee Investment Partners for misallocation of expenses. The SEC charged the small PE firm with inappropriately charging its PE funds for expenses incurred in complying with SEC regulations without disclosing this to the fund’s investors. Cherokee Investment Partners neither admitted nor denied the SEC charges, but it reimbursed the funds for the full amount of expenses (a little over $456,000) and paid a fine of $100,000.
    37 37 SEC (2015d).
    Fees, Fees and More Fees: How Private Equity Abuses Its Limited Partners and U.S. Taxpayers

    SEC Enforcement
    Despite the mounting evidence of private equity abuses and potentially illegal behavior, SEC enforcement actions have been minimal, with only six actions against PE general partners between 2014 and 2016. In 2014, the SEC targeted two small private equity firms — Lincolnshire Management and Clean Energy Capital — for infractions that were relatively minor. In 2015, KKR paid $30 million to settle an enforcement action for misallocating expenses in failed buyout deals; Blackstone paid $39 million to settle charges of improper fee allocation; Fenway Partners paid modest fines for failing to share fee income with investors; and Cherokee Investment Partners paid minimal fines for inappropriate expense charges. The SEC allowed the PE firms in these cases to pay fines with no admission of guilt.

    http://cepr.net/images/stories/reports/private-equity-fees-2016-05.pdf

    https://thenewfire.wordpress.com/lenr-ecat-the-fog-of-british-and-american-energy-companies/

    https://thenewfire.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/lenr_ecat_fog.pdf

  70. Andrea Rossi

    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
    Thank you for the interesting information.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  71. Italo R.

    Dear Dr. Rossi, can we make a rough comparison between a diode (vacuum tube) and the QuarkX?
    In both there are anode, cathode and an electric field between the two.

    In the diode the electrons are emitted by the incandescent cathode; in QuarkX the electrons are made available by the reaction.

    In both so there is an electric current in output. While in diode the output power is (at maximum) equal to the input power (COP = 1), in QuarkX the output power is superior to that input (COP >> 1).

    Kind Regards,
    Italo R.

  72. Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    Information about the charactristics of the QuarkX will be given after the completion of the R&D on course. F8.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  73. Dear Andrea,

    Ego Out Saturday edition Info and LENR in context

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-21-2016-lenr-was-my-yesterdays.html

    A splendid weekend,
    Peter

  74. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  75. Mohammad Quinci

    Dear Andrea:
    I am impressed of the comment yesterday made Mr William Bell ( 7.40 a.m.) after the comment of Woodford.
    Very impressed.
    Fortunately you have the guts to fight, otherwise thay’d have already buried you.
    MQ

  76. Andrea Rossi

    Mohammad Quinci:
    Thank you for your sustain.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  77. P.F.

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Uodate of today for the QuarkX ?

  78. Andrea Rossi

    P.F.:
    Right now: she is in goos standing, regular and still very promising.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  79. Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Regarding your QuarkX development…

    If you used this emerging technology to generate heat by boiling a fluid (e.g., water) and running a turbine, the current industrial technology is around 40% efficient (Carnot plus turbine efficiency). That is, for around 2.5W of output thermal energy, 1W of electrical energy is generated.

    You have indicated that the QuarkX technology can produce direct electrical energy (plus some thermal energy). If this is correct, then there will still be a conversion efficiency to convert the electrical energy produced into useable electrical energy that can be sent on the grid and/or be used to run appliances, etc. Assuming an average conversion efficiency is say, 85%, the QuarkX must have an electrical generation efficiency of greater than 47% to be economically viable compared to the thermal approach suggested above.

    Questions:
    1. Is this analysis correct, given the assumptions stated?
    2. Is the electrical conversion efficiency stated above what you believe you can achieve or are you assuming something better?
    3. Are there overriding factors beside efficiency that would favor a QuarkX direct electrical mode of electrical power generation?

  80. Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    All this information will be given after the completion of the preliminar R&D on course.
    Anyway, your assumptions are groundless, and this is understandable, due to your lack of information ( my “fault” ).
    F8.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  81. Andrea Rossi

    Malcom Abrantes:
    Thank you for your sustain,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  82. Malcolm Abrantes

    Dear Andrea:
    I loved today the comments of William Bell and of Loris.
    At the beginning of this feud I believed that IH was right, because I thought that a so big giant could not be wrong. Now I understand that you are a hard worker that wants to realize his invention, they are dishonest sharks.
    I became a follower of yours.
    Cheers,
    Malcom

  83. Loris

    Dear Andrea Rossi:
    Your answer to Sebastian shows one more time how mendacious is Tom Darden .
    You will win, Andrea.
    Godspeed,
    Loris

  84. Andrea Rossi

    Loris:
    Thank you for your insight.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  85. Sebastian

    Dear Andrea:
    Why you were not able to show to Darden the Customers’ area ?
    Sebastian

  86. Andrea Rossi

    Sebastian:
    In the agreement signed between IH and the Customer it had been agreed by the parties that nobody of IH was allowed to enter in JM area and nobody of JM was allowed to enter the area in which the plant was in operation. This had been agreed upon to defend the IP of both. This agreement has been signed by IH and JM, plus also me.
    The text of the agreement has been written by IH and accepted by JM.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  87. William Bell

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    I read what the officer of Woodford wrote about the litigation between you and IH in a financial blog. They became now shareholders of IH LTD, so obviously they defend IH, but what is disgusting in that comment is that clearly they used your name and your technology to get enormous money from their investors, visited the 1 MW plant that IH made under your direction, collected further money after their technicians visited the 1 MW plant in operation in the customer’s factory and, after collecting all this money from their investors thanks to your work, they deliberately started an action to collect other technologies of the field – that never produced anything- to prepare their investors to the fact that they were going to lose your licence not paying you. Now: since they paid nuts in real cash to buy all that ridiculous “intellectual property” of your competitors, made by revoked patents, useless patent applications, unauthorized patent applications that are copies of your work, etc etc: where is in reality gone the money they got from we investors? From the available information it appears that now the sole asset of IH is a lot of sheres to which has been conferred a value of millions by very, very friendly fair value auditing, but this value is totally fake and such shares are unsellable in the real market, while the real money is disappeared and the license for the sole thing working, which is your E-Cat, is gone. Question: did ever Woodford give you money, or did you ask money from them ?
    God bless you for your work and for your fight against the fire you received from your front and from your back.
    William Bell
    P.S.
    What strongly surprises me is that they made business and gave more than 50 millions to Tom Darden, surely well knowing what is in the following links:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/30/nyregion/anatomy-of-a-deal-new-jersey-style.html
    http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/03/federal_subpoenas_are_issued_f.html
    http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20160208/PC05/160209426
    And this bankrupcy, related to EnCap, owned by Cherokee Investment Partners:
    http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/topstories/index.ssf/2008/07/encaps_bankrupcy_filing_risks.html

  88. Andrea Rossi

    William Bell:
    Thank you for your insight.
    I cannot comment, being issues to be discussed in Court.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  89. Hi Andrea Rossi

    Did you ever figured out so far how much could be an “electrical” cop of the quarkx ecat I mean the ratio of electrical output power/electrical input power. Even a general idea would be appreciated.

    Kind Regards

    Nibbius

  90. Andrea Rossi

    Nibbius:
    The performance data of the QuarkX will be delivered after the completion of the preliminar R&D.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  91. Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    It is good to read that you and your team are progressing well on the QuarkX and I hope with you that F8 will be equally to ‘excellent’. Good luck with it!
    I have some questions that may interest all of you followers:
    In reading your blog I’ve got the impression that you also seem to have made big steps in the theory.
    1. Is that due to the test you said you were going to do with professor Cook?
    2. Were the results of that test in line with the assumptions?
    3. Did you find behaviour that is new and still must be explained?
    Thanks and kind regards, Gerard

  92. Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    1- the work between Prof Cook and me is on course.
    2- N.A.
    3- yes
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  93. Italo R.

    Dear dr. Rossi

    What do you think about how are going the polls in the USA for the election of the new President of the USA ?

    Kind Regards,
    Italo R.

  94. Andrea Rossi

    Italo R:
    I repeat what I already said: the infinite wisdom of the Great People of the USA, that are the sole sovereign of this Country, surely will choose the best possible President.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  95. Dear Andrea,,

    EGO OUT for today, LENR cultural history- a first issue:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-20-2016-toward-cultural-history-of.html

    All the best,

    Peter

  96. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  97. Zenobia Malleck

    Dear Andrea,
    Thank you for the guts you are fighting with to realize for us the E-Cat.
    God bless you,
    Zenobia

  98. Andrea Rossi

    Zenobia Malleck:
    Thanks to you for your sustain to the work of our great Team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  99. Tony Dinnen

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    When do you think we’ll read again a paper from Prof. Cook and you ?
    Thank you,
    Tony

  100. Andrea Rossi

    Tony Dinnen:
    We are working well on it, could be within a couple of months.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  101. Pamela Demian

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    The quarkX will be employed initially for domestic use or for industrial use, with many QuarkX piled up together ?
    Cheers,
    Pamela

  102. Andrea Rossi

    Pamela Demian:
    The first application will be industrial.
    F8.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  103. Curiosone

    Dr Rossi:
    How is going today the QuarkX ?
    Thank you,
    W.G.

  104. Andrea Rossi

    Curiosone:
    She is in good standing also today,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  105. Robert Dorr

    Andrea,

    Was there anytime during the 350 – 400 day 1MW reactor test where all 4 of the 250KW Tigers were completely off line at the same time?

    Thank you for your hard work.

  106. Andrea Rossi

    Robert Dorr:
    Now I have not my records at hand, but, if I remember correctly, we lost about 4-5 days of production during the test period.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  107. JP Renoir

    Dear Andrea:
    Today has been published on the JONP a very interesting paper of Prof UVS Seshavatharam and Prof. S. Lakshminarayana of the university of Andra ( India ).
    Congratilations to the Journal Of Nuclear Physics for his international reach.
    Regards,
    JPR

  108. Andrea Rossi

    JP Renoir:
    Thank you for the citation.
    The title of the paper published today is:
    Understanding the discrete nature of angular momentum of electron in hydrogen atom with (3G, 2e) model of final unification.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  109. Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    What have you learned on the fuel lifetime for eCats? It seems they can go longer than 6 months with some additional demands on their control system. Is this correct?

    Is there a “poison” generated as the fuel is consumed and that degrades the efficiency or is it merely fuel depletion and geometry effects?

  110. Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Yes, I think that the real endurance can be one year. The other questions are related to patents in preparation.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  111. Andrea Rossi

    Luis Navarro:
    Thank you for the interesting link.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  112. Ad Astra

    Dear Dr. Rossi

    Dewey Weaver just admitted on Lenr-Forum that IH’s strategy was to hedge their investment from the start. In other words: buy up your competitors and file patents. That shows bad faith. Why would Dewey admit to this?

    “Woodford was aware of all possibilities with Rossi early on. The failure by Rossi to keep his side of the agreement was hedged by IH from the onset. Full speed ahead.”

    https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3267-Citywire-UK-covers-Woodford-hitting-fraud-case/?postID=20454#post20454

    Dewey needs to get out of that fictional world and get back to reality, where people can see that there is a problem here. A very large, blockish, base-minded problem. To end on a more positive note: The confluence of nativism and tribalism in Mr. Dewey Weaver’s snow jobs ensures a swirling river of discontent upon which he so peremptorily rides.

  113. Andrea Rossi

    Ad Astra:
    Thank you for your insight.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  114. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  115. Dear Andrea Rossi,

    you have written at http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=114#comment-1186667
    ——————————-
    Andrea Rossi
    May 18, 2016 at 5:02 PM
    LookMoo:
    IH has filed applications for patents putting as a co-inventor their engineer T.Barker, who invented absolutely nothing, also because these patent applications copy slavely my patents.[…]
    ——————————-

    fyi. the Industrial Heat patent application US2016/0051957A1 with the Pub.Date: Feb.25,2016 is more or less a full plagiarism of the Levi et.al Lugano Report from October 6, 2014.

    https://thenewfire.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/lenr_ecat_industrial_heat_patent_2016_us20160051957a1.pdf

    https://thenewfire.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/lenr_ecat_rossi_lugano_report.pdf

    All the best
    Uwe Doms

  116. Andrea Rossi

    Uwe Doms:
    Thank you for the information: it is true.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  117. domenico canino

    Smaller cats are more stable cats?

  118. Andrea Rossi

    Domenico Canino:
    Not necessarily, but tendentially yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  119. JR

    Dear Dr Rossi:
    Can we have an update of the QuarkX:

  120. Andrea Rossi

    JR:
    Stable in good standing and long SSM periods.
    Still very promising.
    F8.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  121. LookMoo

    Dear Mr. Rossi,

    IH claims that your ECAT shows no COP. Meanwhile they have filed a patent application where you stands as co-inventor on a device that have a COP of 11.

    Can you tell us a little bit more about this??

  122. Andrea Rossi

    LookMoo:
    IH has filed applications for patents putting as a co-inventor their engineer T.Barker, who invented absolutely nothing, also because these patent applications copy slavely my patents. Thomas Barker is the engineer to whom I teached many things. I knew of these patent applications only after their publication on the internet and I never authorized IH to make such applications, let alone to ” invent the co-inventor”. What is interesting is the fact that they give evidence in these applications of their replications.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  123. Dimitry

    Dear Andrea,
    Thank you for your courage and perseverance.
    You are inspiring.
    Dimitry

  124. Andrea Rossi

    Dimitry:
    Thanks to you for your kind sympathy,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  125. Dear Andrea,

    My blog issue for today under the sign of “dies irae”

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-18-2016-lenr-irre-and-days-of-wrath.html

    But the future will solve the problens,
    Best,
    peter

  126. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  127. Mike Bowman

    seen on ECT about implications by Industrial Heat – Interesting

    Billy Jackson

    .. all that falls apart right when you show they made one themselves … without Rossi’s help then filed a patent claiming a COP of 11+ …

    of everything they have done or said.. IH has to explain that one more than any other part of the lawsuit.

    All the magic and accusations of sleight of hand or fraud, just goes up in smoke when you are taught the magic trick and present it as your own …

  128. Andrea Rossi

    Mike Bowman:
    Thank you for your opinion,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  129. Peter Metz

    Dear Andrea Rossi:

    I’m hearing good things about your possible future E-Cat factory in Sweden (Mats Lewan’s blog). Any chance that this factory will be powered by E-Cats? This would not be unlike Tesla Motor’s Gigafactory being powered by its own solar panels and a great demonstration of the E-Cat!

    Sincerely,
    Peter Metz

  130. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Metz:
    It will surely be heated by the E-Cats. For the rest, F8.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  131. Anonymous

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    How is going the QuarkX today?
    Cheers,

  132. Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    It is working stable and in good standing.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  133. Oystein Lande

    Dear mr Rossi,

    I am a litle surprised that you needed no HVAC system in the e-cat container producing 1MW heat. If you only lost 1% of this inside the container, it still meant 10KW heating,…

    1. I Expect the container itself where not insulated? and therefore transferring effectively the lost heat to the outside surroundings.

    2. Did you have closed doors of the e-cat container during running?

  134. Andrea Rossi

    Oystein Lande:
    The data you are asking for are part of the report that we cannot make public before the disclosure of it in Court.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  135. Bert Wesley

    Dear Dr Rossi:

    The Clown says you pasted the data of the report and confused them. He says you put 100.1 °C also when the plant was shut down.
    Do you think is worth to answer ?
    Cheers,
    Bert

  136. Andrea Rossi

    Bert Wesley:
    The Clown, as you call it, forgot that I didn’t make any data of the report. The data for the report have been collected only by the ERV.
    We are talking of 12 millions of raw data, that, if printed, would make 66 000 pages. The exclusive holder of the raw data is the ERV.
    The temperature indicated by what you call The Clown is wrong, never cited that temperature in the report .
    Who wrote these stupidities obviously knows nothing of the test.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  137. Anonymous

    Dear Andrea :
    Still good the QuarkX ?

  138. Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    Yes, still very promising and in good standing.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  139. Dan C.

    Dear Andrea,

    How can 10KWh be a lot, But 10KWh be so little?
    This sounds contradictory.

    Take a coffee brake Andrea, I got this one.
    10KWh at $0.001 per KWh is insignificant.
    10KWh at $3.00 per KWh is a LOT.

    Quarky, I mean quirky regards
    Dan C.

  140. Andrea Rossi

    Dan C.:
    Your comment is quite confusing. kW are units of power, kWh are units of energy. The numbers you write are nonsense.
    I am not able to answer. Can you rephrase correctly ?
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  141. Bernie Koppenhofer

    Dr. Rossi: Thank you for the recent information you have provided on this site and for giving the Mats Lewan interview, both very positive and informative. I was wondering if you have received back the reports on the isotopic tests of the ash from the year long test. Could you tell us if they are consistent with the Lugano test?

  142. Andrea Rossi

    Bernie Koppenhofer:
    Not yet.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  143. Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Is the reason the control system is separate from the pen-sized reactor is due to the extreme temperatures the reactor produces or for other reasons?

  144. Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    How can I put a control system in a pen ?
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  145. Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Regarding the ERV report:

    1. I have read rumors of the ERV report stating that steam output was constantly 100.1 C throughout the test, even when the plant was shut down — is this accurate? If not, can you say what the average temperature of the steam was?
    2. Was there any difference between the measurements by your own instruments and the ERV’s instruments of steam output?

    Thank you if you can answer,

    Frank Acland

  146. Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    1- The ERV is a nuclear engineer, who worked in nuclear power plants and has a long career as an expert for validations and certifications. The imbecile that wrote such stupidities probably has introjected himself and his own culture in the brain of the ERV. Obviously what you report as a “rumor” is a nonsense. Also the number is wrong. I cannot disclose the data of the report until the report is disclosed in Court.
    2- As you know, I made my own measurements with my instrumentation and also I had access to the displays of the ERV’s instrumentation installed in the plant, so I was able to make a comparision. The data were coherent, within the normal margin of error of the instruments.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  147. Dear Andrea,

    The blog issue for today can be found here:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-17-2016-lenr-world-has-irreversibly.html

    all the best and +

    peter

  148. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  149. Audie Tessmer

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Thank you for the very clear explication you gave to Oystein
    Cheers,
    Audie

  150. Andrea Rossi

    Audie Tessmer:
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  151. Christen

    This may be of interest to you “Physicists discover a new form of light”: http://phys.org/news/2016-05-physicists.html

    Warm regards from Spain

  152. Andrea Rossi

    Christen:
    Thank you for the interesting information, I suppose it is very important for the next computer generations.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  153. Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea
    I read with great interest the article published by Mats Lewan regarding your visit to Sweden and your report of some of the details of the 1 year E-Cat test. I wonder if you could clarify a couple of points:

    1. From what I have read the customer’s work took place inside a sealed enclosure, maybe a shipping container also?
    2. Was the customer’s production facility positioned next to the plant in the same building?
    3. Mats wrote that “IH never had access to the customer’s area”, however you mentioned yesterday that Tom Darden and his investors spoke with the customer in his factory. Can you explain what Mats meant?
    4. Did you buy the building you looked at in Sweden for your factory?
    5. Mats said the 100 W QuarkX is the size of a pen — does each QuarkX include its own control system built in, or is that separate?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  154. Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    1- it took place inside a plant about 20 meters long, 3 meters high, 3 meters wide, obviously closed
    2- it was in a separate area of the same building
    3- Darden and his investors met the Customer in the meeting room of the offices, that is separated from the production area
    4- we are in the process to find an agreement
    5- the control system is separate
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  155. Andrea Rossi

    Rosalba:
    Thank you for your sympathy.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  156. Roberto

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Update about the QuarkX ?
    Ciao,
    Roberto

  157. Andrea Rossi

    Roberto:
    Very, very good.
    I am working with her right now.
    Warmest Regards,
    A.R.

  158. Oystein Lande

    Dear mr. Rossi,

    You say you had 3KW HVAC coolest for the computer container.

    1. This is not the same as e-cat container?

    2. How much HVAC cooling did you supply to inside E-cat container to keep it at working conditions…?

  159. Andrea Rossi

    Oystein Lande:
    1. the container itself was not insulated, because this would have been useless, since all the hot bodies inside the container were thermally insulated
    2. The doors were open during the operation and there was a ventilation system that sent the warm air through the exhaust windows of the roof of the factory
    Besides: you correctly write that if the 1% of the heat produced was lost through the insulation, 10 thermal kW were emitted.
    As you well know, just to give an example that explains which amount of energy we are talking of and as any household knows, 10 kW of power are barely enough to maintain during a mild winter a temperature of 25 °C in a two rooms apartment with close windows.
    A 2 rooms apartment has a volume of about 200 cubic meters.
    We were in a factory with windows in the roof always open; by the way, as you know, warm air goes naturally toward the top being lighter than air colder than it; the volume of the factory is 6 000 cubic meters which means about 30 times the volume of a two rooms apartment.
    Now: if 10 kW of power are able to hold a 2 rooms apartment of 200 cubic meters at 22°C with closed windows, how much are able the same to heat a factory of 6 000 cubic meters with open windows on the roof and a ventilation system to exhaust it ? Obviously the temperature was warmer inside the reactors container, in fact I told you that there were about 40 °C, but, due to the fact that the doors of the container were open and that also inside the container there was a ventilation system, the internal temperature of the reactors container never is gone above the 40 °C.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  160. Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    “Dear Dr Rossi:
    Maybe your readers are interested, to better understand who Tom Darden and Mr Weaver are, to read carefully the following links:

    The Pennsauken project
    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/30/nyregion/anatomy-of-a-deal-new-jersey-style.html
    http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/03/federal_subpoenas_are_issued_f.html

    The two bankruptcies in Feb 2016
    http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20160208/PC05/160209426

    EnCap (Owned by Cherokee Investment Partners) bankruptcy in 2008
    http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/topstories/index.ssf/2008/07/encaps_bankruptcy_filing_risks.html

    These gentlemen are not very credible , the readers will understand.
    Regards,
    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

  161. Andrea Rossi

    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  162. Rosalba Dadlani

    Dear Andrea,
    Congratulations for the attributes with which you are dealing with enemies one thousand folds stronger and powerful than you. For us it is fun to watch this sort of movie, but I understand for you it is hard to sustain all this and at the same time to continue to work on your E-Cat.
    Thank you for all you are doing,
    Rosalba

  163. Micky

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Questions, if you can answer:
    1- before the beginning of the test did Tom Darden meet the president of the Customer (JM) ?
    2- did he know that the president of JM, the Customer, was also your attorney ?
    3- if yes, did he sign a contract with JM after knowing what in points 1 and 2 ?
    4- when he accompanied his investors to visit the plant of the Customer, did Tom Darden and his investors speak with the Customer in his factory ?
    5- during these visits did he say anything negative to you and to his investors, or he only said positive things ?
    6- is it true that Tom Darden collected substantial amounts of money from the investors after their visit to the plant to the Customer ?
    7- at the time Darden made the visits to the plant in the factory of the Customer, had he already received from the ERV the first quarter report ?
    8 if yes, were the results of the report with the data of the first quarter moreless equal to the results of the final report ?
    Thank you for your answers,
    Cheers,
    Micky

  164. Andrea Rossi

    Micky:
    1- yes
    2- yes
    3- yes
    4- yes
    5- He spoke only positively of the plant and the test on course
    6- yes
    7- yes
    8- yes
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  165. Patrick Ellul

    Caro Andrea,

    Thank you so much for taking the time to talk to Mats Lewan during your important visit to Sweden.

    His blog post about your meeting is well written and very revealing.

    Mats is like an escrow of trust in our community. I hope you can keep him in the loop as much as you can and let him attend some important events even if under NDA.
    Just focus on the quark-x.

    Thank you and best regards,
    Patrick

  166. Andrea Rossi

    Patrick Ellul:
    Thank you for the suggestions.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  167. Oystein Lande

    Dear mr. Rossi,

    what size of HVAC system did you use to keep the working conditions cool inside the 1MW container?

    I assume a few percent of the 1MW was lost as heat inside the container, which you would need to remove.

  168. Andrea Rossi

    Oystein Lande:
    1- No, we had two containers, one with the control systems, one with the E-Cats
    2- In the E-Cat container there was no air conditioned, because inside that container the temperature was the same you have in any industrial thermic central.
    The temperature was warm obviously, but not too much, because all the hot parts were well insulated, also to conserve the energy. Reactors, steam pipes and water pipes were very well insulated.
    There was also a ventilation system that conveyed the warm air toward the windows of the ceiling. Normally we were not inside the E-Cat container, where we had to go only in case of reparations or maintainance; here the temperature was around 40°C.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  169. Ronaldo

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    I am so glad you are continuing your work, turning a blind eye to the other problems. With you we will have the LENR.
    Take care of yourself.
    Ronaldo

  170. Andrea Rossi

    Ronaldo:
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  171. Hampus Ericsson

    Hi Rossi

    This new technology should sound like something from the Star Trek universe. I think Quark Cell is a fitting name.
    I can hear Picard ask for some more Quark cells when he needs to refuel the hyperdrive.

    Thanks for considering Sweden for your new factory, it would be such an honor to have the first Quark cell factory on Swedish land.

    Greetings from northern Sweden, Hampus Ericsson

  172. Andrea Rossi

    Hampus Ericsson:
    It is an honour for me to make a factory there.
    I hope that Picard will not settle for a bicycle,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  173. Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    According to the contract published in the court documents, this is the way that the ERV was to perform the measurements in the Validation test: “To make this measurement the ERV will measure the flow of the heated fluid and the Delta T between the temperature of the fluid before and after the E-Cat reaction”.

    Is this the measurement system used in the ERV report?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  174. Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    I confirm that the ERV has made the measurements coherently with the protocol signed in the Agreement between the two parties.
    He made all the measurements with his own certified instrumentation and at the end of the test the RRV has himself disconnected and retrieved his instrumentetion, to send it to the manufacturers of every instrument to re-certify every instrument to be sure that during the test none of them has changed the margin of error.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  175. Dear Andrea,

    One comment about the British 1956 patent mentioned by Greg Leonard. It uses O16, P31, Co59, Cd112 (O16 is not mentioned, but it’s there). What is common to these isotopes? They all have a number of neutrons which is a power of two: 8,16,32,64. The same holds for He4 (2), Li7 (4), Ni60 (32) and Pd110 (64). Such power-of-two neutron isotopes are rather rare, there are only a few others, namely N15 (8), Si30 (16), S32 (16), Fe58 (32), In113 (64), Sn114 (64). Some of these are very minor isotopes while some are common, like S32 which is 96% of natural sulfur.

    That said, I don’t know of any theoretical reason why a power of two neutron number would imply anything special in a nucleus.

    regards, /pekka

  176. Andrea Rossi

    Pekka Janhunen:
    Thank you for your information,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  177. Robert

    Dear Dr Rossi:
    Can you explain if the 1 MW plant that has made the 1 year long test is still in operation ? If not: can you explain why ? There are many different rumers around .
    Cheers,
    Robert

  178. Andrea Rossi

    Robert:
    Leonardo Corporation wanted to lock the plant after the end of the test waiting for the payment. The plant has been stopped and locked upon agreement between the two parties.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  179. Greg Leonard

    I gave the wrong ‘best’ link. It should have been
    http://www.lookingforheat.com/e-cat-quark-x-lenr-1956/

  180. Andrea Rossi

    Greg Leonard:
    Interesting,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  181. Andrea Rossi

    Carol Woelke:
    Thank you, I am doing my best, together with my great Team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  182. S.

    Dear Andrea Rossi:
    Do you confirm that with the QuarkX you can theoretically have a density of power of 1 MW/100 liters of volume ?
    Regards,
    S.

  183. Andrea Rossi

    S.:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  184. Sebastian

    Dear Andrea,

    Isn’t renting/leasing a factory building a better option than buying for your business’ cash flow?

    Regards

  185. Andrea Rossi

    Sebastian:
    We are making long term plans: to rent is an expense, to buy is an investment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  186. Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Hello dr . Rossi, I am sending two important links that I suggest to the readers.

    Rossi makes offer on Swedish factory building – plus more updates
    https://animpossibleinvention.com/2016/05/16/rossi-makes-offer-on-swedish-factory-building-plus-more-updates/

    #LENR #ECAT Saga: Jed Rothwell Showing Infinite Lack of Judgment Skill!
    http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/lenr-ecat-saga-jed-rothwell-showing-infinite-lack-of-judgment-skill/#comment-27787

  187. Andrea Rossi

    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
    Thank you for the links.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  188. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  189. Joseph Fine

    Andrea Rossi,

    I must apologize. You correctly said 10 W/cc, not 100 W/cc.

    Apologetic regards,

    Joseph Fine

  190. Joseph Fine

    Andrea Rossi, Sheba Malacara, Jaroslaw Bem:

    I accidentally opened up a “can of cubic centimeters or milliliters”.

    See “Can of Worms: http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/can+of+worms

    One milliliter (mL) is equivalent to 1 cubic centimeter.

    So, 10 W/mL is equivalent to 10,000 W/Liter. (My answer…)

    And, 10 kW/L = 1000 kW/100 Liters (That is, 1 MW/100 L)

    100 W/cc, on the other hand, is 100 kW/Liter, or 10 MW/100 Liters.

    So, at the risk of being wrong, the answer should be 10 W/cc or 10 W/mL.

    Thank you for making me think about this.

    I hope I have clarified this to you.

    But how did you reduce the volume to 100 Liters?!! (y) :) (y)

    Joseph Fine

  191. Greg Leonard

    Dear AR,
    I assume the ‘very important event’ relates to your June test.
    I hope your preparations are going well.

    A second issue: what do you think of this 1956 British patent which claims to get 1kW electric output from a mixture of Cadmium, Phosphorus and Cobalt when subject to magnetic and RF stimulation,
    Best link is
    http://rexresearch.com/colman/colman.htm

  192. Carrol Woelke

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Congratulations for your fantastic work and your courage,
    Carroll

  193. Andrea Rossi

    “Jag bara undrar”:
    I agree, but, probably, before the suit will arrive to the verdict, a very important event will happen in the market, independently from the civil suit. I am dedicating the 90% of my working time to make this event possible.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  194. Candis Colden

    Dear Andrea Rossi:
    The more IH pays puppets, the more you gain followers after the blatant falsity of their statements. They are spending their money to your advantage.
    Godspeed,
    Candis

  195. Andrea Rossi

    Candis Colden:
    Thank you: it is true.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  196. Forys

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Still good our QuarkX ?
    Cheers,
    Forys

  197. Andrea Rossi

    Forys:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  198. "Jag bara undrar?"

    Am I right in assuming that it is essential for the Leonardo Corporation to the upcoming trial really goes to the “bottom” of this civil suit . It is so important that it does not matter how long the trial will be. Gladly few extra months just to get a good job done ….

    Warm regards “Jag bara undrar?”

  199. Oystein Lande

    Dear mr Rossi,

    Will a public demonstration serve any good? I’m thinking it’s better to focus on getting it ready for the market:

    I think there may be two outcomes of a public test:
    1. Any advanced enough (like Alien 😉 ) technology will always be considered magic. If QuarkX is the real thing, the technology is far ahead of everyone. And any public demonstration of QuarkX will therefore be percieved as a magic trick.

    2. Sceptics: Rossi is pulling a practical joke on all of us. And his public demonstration will therefore be concluded a Nice magic trick.

  200. Andrea Rossi

    Oystein Lande:
    Inside the computer container we had a 3 kW air conditioner. Keeping the doors closed we could work well ( the computer container is m. 9 x 2.5 x 2.5 ).
    Of course some heat was lost inside the factory, but the ceiling of the factory had many air exhausts and the warm air, being lighter, goes toward the ceiling and the factory has a good height.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  201. Andrea Rossi

    Jaroskaw Bem:
    Sorry, I wrote a typo, tacitally corrected by Dr Joseph Fine: I wrote erroneously cl insread of cc.
    I corrected the typo after reading your comment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  202. Clearwater

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Today, Sunday, did you work with the QuarkX ? We know you on Sunday play tennis with your wife, but do you also have an update of our QuaekX ?
    Cheers,
    Clearwater

  203. Andrea Rossi

    Clearwater:
    Yes, today I worked with the QuarkX: as a matter of fact, I am working with her right now too. Is good, still very promising.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  204. Sam

    Dr. Rossi,

    I look forward each day to reading your comments. You are an inspiring person.

    I have been following your work since 2011 and I am dismayed by how you have been treated by IH.

    Does IH have a date by which to respond to your law-suite? Do you have any idea of when the trial will begin?

    Thank you for taking the time from a busy schedule to let us know what is happening in your life.

    — Sam

  205. Andrea Rossi

    Sam:
    Sorry, but I cannot deal in this blog with these issues.
    Very sorry,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  206. Italo R.

    >As everyone knows,

    classic absolutely generic assertion tending to let people think that it is true. But this assertion isn’t valid, it’s a fake and hasn’t the minimum credibility!

  207. Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    Which assertion are you referring to ?
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  208. Dear Andrea,

    A Sunday issue of my blog pacifist:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-15-2016-sunday-issue-about-lenr.html

    The most instructive is at the end- cobra managemenT

    Best wishes,
    Peter

  209. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  210. Andrea Rossi

    Luis Navarro:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  211. Stephen

    I’m tired of the mud slinging, the fog machine, the missinformation, the misdirection and school playground manipulation. Honestly it’s like being 14 again. And I feel like that just as an observer. I can only begin to imagine how you must feel. I try to be open minded and I know I am ignorant of many things but I have not forgotten the detailed posts you have made this past year and seen there how they slowly developed and your confidence with the plant grew through careful care. After seeing all this mud and the direction it comes from I understand you more than before though and I am clear where the truth lies. A few weeks or a month of mud can’t undo what you have achieved. I hope you get your chance for justice and the due apologies you deserve and most of all I hope are able to continue peacefully your work with e-cat.

  212. Andrea Rossi

    Stephen:
    Thank you for your sympathy. Our great team is continuing peacefully my job, independently from all the other issues.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  213. Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Regarding the 1-year 1MW E-Cat test:

    1. Is production data from the E-Cat customer recorded ?
    1-bis. if yes, is it available to you?
    2. If so, does the production data harmonize with the ERV report that apparently states that circa 1MW of steam was produced by the plant for the duration the test?
    3. Are the electricity bills paid by the customer retained, and are they available to you?
    4. If so, do these electricity bills harmonize with the data from the ERV report that (according to court documents) the plant operated at a COP of over 50 for the duration of the test?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  214. Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    1. yes
    1-bis. no
    2. they every month delivered a report restricted to the amount of steam they received and it has always been coherent with our production data
    3. yes, we have copy of all of them
    4. yes
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  215. Engineer48

    2016 IH patent application is basically a copy of 2014 Ecat Lugano report. Note image 18D showing claimed COP > 3.6.

    https://thenewfire.wordpress.com/2016-industrial-heat-patentapplication-is-a-copy-of-lugano-report/

    So IH now claim no excess heat from the reactor they designed, manufactured & had tested by the Lugano team, yet claimed excess heat in their patent application.

    Bit strange that.

  216. Andrea Rossi

    Engineer48:
    very strange indeed. By the way: that patent application, where they put abusively their chief engineer as a co-inventor, while he has invented absolutely nothing, has been made without I knew anything about it. I knew of it only when it has been published.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  217. Jaroslaw Bem

    Dear Sheba Malacara Joseph Fine

    As Dr Rossi said (May 14, 2015 at 9:30 AM) he gain the power density in Quark X = 10 W/cL, then theoretical extrapolation of that power density to the power 1 MW gives volume of 1000 L. (one thousand Liters). Of course not counting the volume of the heat exchanger.
    Best regards,
    Jaroslaw B.

  218. J. Cunningham

    interesting post on EgoOut:

    Felix Rends

    “This is about calorimetry. As everyone knows, Rossi did bad calorimetry in previous tests.”

    I am very curious, I understand that it is even for specialists difficult to make an exact calorimetry on a single test devices in a laboratory, but is it really possible to incorrectly analyze a COP greater 50 using calorimetry on a device that (claimed) is producing 1MW/h thermal heat and is running 352 days in mostly self sustain mode?

    And if yes, could you please explain to me how do you think could such an incorrect measurement occur, is it a fundamental error out of unintentional ignorance and lack of professionalism, or are the data simply manipulated or falsified. So my question is, can someone incorrectly ‘measure’ a COP 50 on a device running 352 days in self sustain mode and how?”
    I like to add: can a team of paid puppets of Tom Darden, unable to make basic mathematics, continue to insult a nuclear engineer, expert of nuclear power plants, expert certificator, to be unable to measure a COP of a very small ( respect a nuclear power plant ) steam generator in 352 days of test of a plant working 24/7 ? How much are the chances that a bunch of semi-analphabete puppets can teach him to make a calorimetric measurement ? By the way: I made a search and in all the life of Dr Penon, the ERV, there has been not a silgle flaw related to his profession and his honesty. His professional record is immaculate.

  219. Andrea Rossi

    J.Cunningham:
    Thank you for your insight.
    Unfortunately, in the blogosphere any imbecile can sell himself as a guru of any matter, so long his readers know nothing about the same matter: for example, a low level informatic can pass himself as a Physicist with the capital “P”: it is a sort of a masturbatory blogopopulism, an opportunity for an insignificant guy to crop a group celebration of his own narcissism, with the plus to get money from his puppeteer: guess who the puppeteer is in this case.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  220. Joseph Fine

    Dear Andrea Rossi, Sheba Malacara,

    Since 1 MW per 100 L is 10 kW/Liter, (or 10^4 W/L)

    The equivalent for 10 Watts should be 10 W/milliliter or 100 W/centiliter.

    Of course, I make mistakes too. Once I thought I made a mistake, but I was wrong.

    😉 😀 B|

    Joseph Fine

  221. Tamar Gaestel

    Dear Andrea,
    Do you think the hot fusion has a future ?
    Thank you,
    Tamar

  222. Andrea Rossi

    Tamar Gaestel:
    As a business yes.
    As an energy generation system is not easy.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  223. Edmund Wirta

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Did I understand well that you want to produce only one very small module in massive quantity to allow to pile it up to any limit of desired power ?
    Cheers,
    Edmund

  224. Andrea Rossi

    Edmund Wirta:
    Correct,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  225. Dear Andrea,

    My blog today
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-14-2016-lenr-some-info-too-many.html

    An other smallish issue grafted on a nasty, big quarrel

    peter

  226. Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    We are Cats, but you are a veritable Lion !
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  227. Steven N. Karels

    Andrea,

    With the new QuarkX eCat being developed, would you consider the professionals at Lugano evaluating its performance?

  228. Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    When the product will be ready it will be put in the market.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  229. Caro Andrea Rossi
    Saluti dall’Italia! (quella sana)
    Ho creato un gruppo su FB che conta quasi 500 sostenitori.
    Cerco di tenere sempre aggiornata la pagina con le notizie che riesco a reperire.
    Purtroppo in Italia credo ci sia una vera e propria censura, quindi sono costretto a navigare su siti di tutto il mondo (che disgrazia).
    Conosco Salvo Mandarà e aspetto con gioia che Lei conceda un’altra intervista dandoci belle notizie.
    Volevo solo chiederle di indicarmi se ci sono altre fonti accreditate dove posso seguire i suoi sviluppi o se mi consiglia di seguire solamente questo forum.
    Grazie
    Giovanni Caruso

  230. Andrea Rossi

    Giovanni Caruso:
    Thank you for your help and your attention to the work of my Team.
    For the Readers that do not speak Italian: in a nutshell, you have asked me which blogs I suggest to read to get informed about my activity.
    My suggestion is just follow all the blogs, the friendly ones and the hostile as well and make up your mind.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  231. Sheba Malacara

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    About the QuarkX Cat: do you confirm that in a volume of 100 liters you can put a power of 1 MW ?
    Godspeed,
    Sheba

  232. Andrea Rossi

    Sheba Malacara:
    Yes, we are getting 10 W/cl, obviously not counting the heat exchanger.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  233. Andrea Rossi

    Dr Joseph Fine:
    Thank you for the information !
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  234. Jenny

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    How is going the E- Cat QuarkX today ?
    Cheers,
    Jenny

  235. Andrea Rossi

    Jenny:
    Still good.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  236. Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Hi, Dr Rossi:
    Find here a link to the report of the US Navy expert Louis F. DeChiaro , Ph.D. : he has published the C.O.P. the 23/09/2016:

    Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) Phenomena and Potential Applications
    Louis F. DeChiaro, Ph.D.
    Physicist
    September 23, 2015

    Rossi 1 Megawatt LENR Plant
    Original version ~100 10 kW. Ecats in std. 20 ft. ship container.
    More recent version uses 4 250 kW reactors.
    Completed >200 days of 400 day test @ US customer factory.
    Heat is now being used by customer for mfg. operations.
    Performance report expected around Feb-Mar., 2016.
    C.O.P. (Pout /Pin) typically varies between 20 and 80.

    https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Attachment/386-IEEE-brief-DeChiaro-9-2015-pdf/

  237. Andrea Rossi

    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
    Thank you for the link.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  238. Joseph Fine

    Andrea Rossi,

    LHC beam energy:

    https://cds.cern.ch/journal/CERNBulletin/2015/49/News%20Articles/2105084?ln=en

    A lot of kinetic energy here…..

    Lead-ion collisions: the LHC achieves a new energy record

    After the Bevatron (Berkeley, 1954) – which broke the energy barrier of billions of electronvolts – and the Tevatron (Fermilab, 1987) – which reached a trillion electronvolts – the LHC is now reaching the peta- (quadrillion) electronvolt level with its heavy-ion collisions (see here). However, one should remember that the average energy per colliding nucleon pair, within the 1 PeV “fireball”, is 5 TeV (compared to 13 TeV in the recent proton-proton collisions).

    https://cds.cern.ch/journal/CERNBulletin/2015/49/News%20Articles/2108943?ln=en

    In this year’s one-month run, the first week was devoted to colliding protons at 2.51 TeV per beam to provide reference data for the subsequent collisions of lead nuclei (the atomic number of lead is Z=82, compared to Z=1 for protons) at the unprecedented energy of 5.02 TeV in the centre of mass per nucleon.

    And, anyway (“de toute facon”):

    “Nothing is as powerful as an idea whose time has come.”

    “Rien n’est plus fort qu’une idée dont l’heure est venue.”

    – Victor Hugo

    Powerful regards,

    Joseph Fine

  239. Andrea Rossi

    Dr Joseph Fine:
    Thank you for the link.
    I am positively surprised, because this is a tremendous improvement of the LHC, that with the discovery of the Higgs field had reached “only” 250 GeV.
    It must be added, though, that we are still far from the “sigma 5” that could allow the confirmation of the discovery, albeit the “sigma 2” that has been reached is of statistical importance, also because reached in concomitance with a “sigma 1.5” reached from another team working in parallel on the same subject.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  240. Andrea Rossi

    Dr Joseph Fine:
    Thank you for the very interesting link. I am very surprised ( positively surprised ) because the LHC has been fantastically improved after the finding of the Higgs field, for which an energy of about 250 GeV had been reached.
    This discovery is very important.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  241. Joseph Fine

    Andrea Rossi, Inge Warnken,

    Here is information on the LHC experiments that show an excess of photon pairs that may indicate a new particle.

    ( See link to the 750 GeV ‘bump’.

    http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2016/apr/19/theorizing-about-the-lhcs-750-gev-bump

    Supersymmetric regards,

    Joseph Fine

  242. Andrea Rossi

    Luis Navarro:
    Thank you for the link.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  243. Inge Warnken

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    The LHC of CERN has found a new elementary particle at energies around 750 GeV. This is a particle that was not supposed to exist and couls revolutionize the Standard Model.
    Do you have an opinion about this?
    Cheers,
    Ingeborg

  244. Andrea Rossi

    Inge Warnken:
    I am surprised: I did not know the LHC is able to reach that level of energy.
    Are you sure they got 5 Sigma ?
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.