Rossi Blog Reader
This website tracks recent postings to Andrea Rossi's
Journal of Nuclear Physics,
sorting the entries with priority to Rossi's answers, which appear under each question.
• Email to Andrea Rossi - Journal Of Nuclear Physics
• Website comments to the Webmaster (who has no contact or connection with Rossi).
• Updated: 2017-07-28 10:40:06.908869Z
Dear Andrea,
What would be the size of a 1MW E-Cat QX plant (including heat exchangers)?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Let me rephrase Iars’ question. While current nuclear power plants control the reaction within the enriched uranium by control rod position, among other techniques, it is conceptually possible to replace each uranium fuel rod assembly with an equivalent number of ECAT-QX reactors and to electrically control their thermal output. However, the current nuclear power plant is most likely contaminated with lingering nuclear active by products. SO:
1. Theoretically – would this harsh environment be so bad as to affect the theoretical ECAT-QX functionality?
2. This assumes, if the ECAT-QX could so operate, that its equivalent power density could match that of the uranium fuel rod. Would that be a problem, keeping in mind that the enrichment is below 50% — reactor grade, not weapons grade.
3. Does it make more sense to build numerous, smaller output and physical size units to decentralize the power generation?
I agree that an integrated energy approach is most likely to be used, but uranium fuel rod assemblies present, in my opinion, an interesting alternative, if possible.
Dear Andrea,
now when you master to put a lot of QXs in parallell, do you think your E-Cat QX can replace uranium in the nuclear power plants?
Lars:
Presently this is science-fiction.
Anyway, I repeat my mantra about this kind of issues: all the energy sources must be integrated.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Interesting to see this post on Twitter:
Was a pleasure to meet Rick Harrison of
@pawnstars & discuss the potential for
Low Nuclear Energy Reaction #technology
in the future. #LENR
https://twitter.com/RepWalterJones
Buck:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Sounds great. You could have approached the boiling point by reducing the flow rate of the fluid (e.g., water). But the test will be more impressive at larger output thermal powers and the baseline or fixed power consumption of the controller becomes less significant.
As always, I want to stress the necessity of calibration and calibration checks of calibration. Don’t directly rely on a manufacturer’s calibration but verify it yourself. Also run the calibration routines beyond the power level expected for the demonstration using your resistive dummy loads so you are not operating on the edge of calibration but in its center.
Sounds like a lot of work and great fun!
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for the suggestions,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
In other LENR experiments, it seemed that surface/volume ratio was important for the COP. Nickel wires had higher COP than bulk material and powdered nickel even higher.
Is for this same reason, that you passed from big bulky modules in the order of KW to small modules in the order of W?
From the specs it would seem so: LT E-Cat 6-50/80 COP with big elements and QX E-Cat 2000 COP with very small elements.
You also said that the control is easier. This seems reasonable since the bigger the module, the bigger the chance of inhomogeneity and thus hot spots… If the hot spot is far from the surface, there could be problems. But with the tiny size of the QX, an eventual hot-spot is very near to the surface…
Also the two properties could be correlated: high instability means that you must keep the throttle down to avoid meltdown… Low instability means that you can push higher the throttle, and if the reaction is non linear, at higher “throttle” the COP could be higher…
Thoughts?
Regards,
Marco.
Marco:
Thank you for the insight. I cannot comment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Penso La interessi:
https://futurism.com/googles-new-algorithm-wants-to-help-researchers-stabilize-nuclear-fusion-reactions/
la sua RD ha forse bisogno di un fisico specialista in algoritmi?
I think Interests:
https://futurism.com/googles-new-algorithm-wants-to-help-researchers-stabilize-nuclear-fusion-reactions/
its RD has perhaps need a physical specialist in algorithms?
buon lavoro
Pietro F.
Pietro F.:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
JPR:
We are still on our way toward Sigma 5 and testing the cluster for the demo.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
When you bundle your modules, must they be rigidly mounted….or can they lie loosely like in a pebble-bed, with the fluid pushing up to cause them to tumble?
Best regards,
Iggy Dalrymple
Iggy Dalrymple:
This information is confidential.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
1. How many in parallel?
2. All controlled by a single controller?
3. Still no phase change?
Steven N.Karels:
1- we’ll see. Our module at average, not risky operation, has a power of 10 W, now we are working to pile them up in a tiny space.
2- yes
3- yes, we’ll increase the flow to maintain the T below 100 Celsius degrees, just to make measurements simpler.
Direct current, liquid phase
make the test a simpler case
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please find on
http://www.rossilivecat.com
comments published today in other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi
You say that you are increasing the power. Is this be combining multiple E-CAT QX’s together. Could you give an indication of how many you will now show at the demonstration?
thanks
Mark
Mark:
We are piling up 20 modules.
Today we worked all the day on the apparatus for the demonstration, it is working.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Are the improvements:
1. Raising the output power from a single reactor?
2. Ganging additional reactors together?
3. Both?
Steven N. Karels:
1- no
2- yes
3- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr.Rossi, is it possibile that the increase in power could delay the presentation caused by some problem?
Kind regards,
Italo R.
Italo R.:
No.
If we do not succeed to pile up a more powerful system, we will anyway introduce the basic 20 W module.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The Prof Wong that made the expertice for you during the litigation is a Prof of Engineering?
Prof:
He is a Professor of Thermosynamics at the University of Miami. He wrote the book “Thermodynamics for Engineers”.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
I have been following your progress since your public demonstration will Dr. Sergio Focardi. Your progress has been amazing to watch.
You stated earlier: “Today we are making substantial improvements to raise the power of the apparatus that will be presented in the demonstration.”
1. Is this increase in power due to adding more QX reactors to the demonstration setup or due to a changes to the QX and its control system?
2. If due to increase in the quantity of reactors, do you have a ballpark figure for what you are shooting for on the output power?
May God speed you in your endeavor!
Paul:
1- we are putting more modules in parallel
2- between 200 and 500 W
Thank you for your attention and sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
JPR:
Today we are making substantial improvements to raise the power of the apparatus that will be presented in the demonstration.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
From a multitude of answers you gave here, I have the impression that you are working to simplify the control to make it as cheap as possible, and that no scientific or technological secrets can actually be deduced from the operation of the control.
A bit like God created the universe: First, it is thought that it all works according to fixed rules that are derived from direct observations, but the more someone begins to investigate, the more he realizes that it is more complex, nested and recursive than what a human brain can understand.
Although the latter may be due to our way of fragmenting the knowledge, and pass these pieces into education in a serial way. It is rather because of coincidence and analogies that our brain makes it a universe again. If at least the brain continues to work well for long enough, which is a bit of a nasty limitation of a human being which also limits humanity in different ways.
Suppose that no pay should be counted, just the materials. How much would 100 E-Cat QX cost, along with a controller in the current state of development and without life-span requirements?
The reason for my question is not to deceive secrets, but because I have seen that both you and some people who make replicas, it is a fact that the experiments look extremely non-tax-paid. This is unlike others who want to impress with expensive looking laboratory arrangements. Is that just practical or is there a philosophy behind?
Experi-mental regards,
Koen
Koen Vandewalle:
It is too soon to talk of prices, while costs are confidential.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi ,
At the october E-CAT QX presentation, will there be some guests invited ?
Warm regards,
Toussaint françois
Toussaint Francois:
Yes.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Regarding your response to Silvio Caggia, It seems that everyone looks to you to solve all of our environmental issues. Nearly free electricity powering everything. The coal mines will close, the oil and gas rigs will stop and the wells capped. Great, maybe in time we can eliminate our energy dependence on oil but what about our chemical dependence? What about our need for coal in our metals industries? We’ll still need coal. I believe the Ecat Qx to be a great step forward in energy production and it will positively impact our society in ways we can not yet imagine. The Ecat Qx is not, however, a panacea. Even if it were, I think we humans will continue to invent new ills as quickly as we invent cures.
Good luck and thank you.
John C Evans
John C. Evans:
I agree with you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, I was wondering what, in your own mind, should be result of the coming demonstration of the e-cat QX.
1. Provide hints to all the labs and individuals trying to replicate your effect
2. Convince some nay-sayers (uhm…)
3. Please your existing supporters (uhm…)
4. Attract potential customers
5. Attract potential investors
6. Attract industrial partners (car manufacturers, utility companies, you name it ….)
7. Revamp the interest of the (still skeptical) scientific community
8. Make a splash with the general public through the media (CNN, CBS, WSJ…)
Thanks, all the best
Piero:
We want just make a demo of our E-Cat QX.
Period.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You posted “Flow heating: 1.58 C / 1.8″ x 11 g”
Just to make sure we understand your nomenclature:
11 grams of water flowed over 1.8 seconds causing a change in temperature of the water of 1.58C.
Water flow rate past the reactor = 11 grams / 1.8 sec = 6.1 grams of water per second
The thermal change rate was 1.58C in 1.8 seconds or 0.88C/sec
Therefore, the amount of water raised 1C in one second was 6.1 grams of water raising 0.88C in one second or 5.4 grams of water was raised 1C in one second
A Calorie is defined as raising 1 gram of water at normal pressure 1 C and 1 Calorie = 4.186 Joules
So raising 5.4 grams of water 1 C in one second required 5.4 Calories or 22.47W
Is this interpretation correct?
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Thanks very much — makes sense now. (I do wonder why pick a seemingly arbitrary time period like 1.8 seconds)
Best wishes,
Frank
Frank Acland:
The choice of a period of 1.8 seconds is due to our kind of calculations.
Warm Regards,
Andrea
Hi Andrea,
Sorry, it may have been a misinterpretation from the Gullstroem-Rossi paper”
Flow heating: 1.58 C / 1.8″ x 11 g
What does (“) represent?
Thank you!
Frank
Frank Acland:
It is a formula to calculate the speed of heating: it means that we measured a speed of heating of 1.58 Celsius degree every 1,8 seconds in a mass of 11 grams of water.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
the “JOURNAL OF CONDENSED MATTER NUCLEAR SCIENCE” (VOLUME 19, June 2016) reports the theory of “Electron-mediated Nuclear Reactions (EMNR)” (Formation of the hydronions: extreme ultraviolet emissions). Can you give us your opinion?
Pietro:
I am very sorry, but trying to recover from the spam your comment ( many comments go to the spam involuntarily and I try to recover as much of them as I can), I lost it.
Please send it again.
This is valid also for all our Readers: when you don’t see your comment published, please send it by email to
info@journal-of-nuclear-physics.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Reading that you are meeting an oil refiner makes your product not so game changer…
Ok, “all sources of energy must integrate”…
But… Oil?!?
Regards
Silvio Caggia:
Your comment seems to me affected by whateverism.
If you make a more thoroughly thinking, you cannot miss that:
1- without oil we could not survive today and we would not survive for many decades from now.
A logic consequence of 1 is:
2- better try to make oil with non polluting sources, if and when possible, at least until oil will becomes history ( probably several centuries, unless we take in serious consideration the mental masturbations of the usual coffe-shop scientists and of the energetic trolls ).
And yes, all the energy sources have to be integrated.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr Rossi,
Thank you for the answer to my last question.
If I may ask,
Approximately how quickly (if possible) could a single Qx bring 1 ltr of water to boiling point?
Steve Swatman:
The vaporization heat of water is 540 Kcal
1 kcal= 1.14 W
Plus you need 1 kcal/Celsius degree to raise the T of water from the initial T up to 99.9 C degrees
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Can you explain why the test cited in the recent Gullstroem-Rossi paper ran for only 1.8 seconds? It seems quite short to me.
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Come on, Frank: 1.8 seconds is a very nonsensical time at all: where did you find it?
I never said this obvious nonsense. If you found it somewhere, please tell me, it is obviously a typo waiting to be corrected.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dr Rossi,
not sure if you missed the VIDEO – Monty Python
and the – Holy Grail – Bunny Attack Scene that was
posted on LENR Forum while back?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcxKIJTb3Hg
G’day Mate
Marcus:
He,he,he
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Are you the rabbit?
Ha,ha,ha!
Cheers
Pavel
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
What is your sincere opinion of the so called “Supersymmetry”? How can be taken seriously a simmetry between Bosons and Fermions? It is like find a symmetry between men and elephants!
Cheers
Prof
Prof:
In part I agree with you, in part I do not. Supersymmetry is researched for presently by the LHC of the CERN, and it could be a tremendous achievement if the scientists focused on this research would find evidence of a Supersymmetry, because it could resolve the “hierarchy problem” bound to the impossibility to reconcile the expected value of the Higgs field in empty space and the observed value of it, which puts in serious crisis the fundamentals of the Standard Model; the weakly interacting massive particles that could be allowed by the Supersymmetry could explain also the acceleration of the galaxies in the Universe and could give an identity to the “dark matter”.
Think about this: the guys that not so many centuries ago thought that beyond the Hercules Columns there was another continent, that the Earth was orbiting around the Sun and was a sphere were alternatively burnt alive or confined in a recovery for fools…Supersymmetry could just be an analogy ( mutatis mutandis ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
In your interview with Frank Acland(ECW) July 20th, you said you were to meet with an oil refiner day after tomorrow. That would be July 22nd. On JONP on July 22nd, you posted to JPR, Today great internal test.
Warm Regards, A.R.
Would it be safe to assume the 2 are related?
If so, do you think further meetings with the oil refiner will take place?
In the interview, you also mentioned,
“And some very important replication, I suppose, is going soon to be disclosed.”
Is this related too?
Warm regards to you and your team,
Dan C.
Dan C.:
Sorry, all this information is confidential.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
The upcoming presentation has many of us encouraged, and again, congratulations to you and your team on this schedule. My wife is also very interested in your progress, and sends her regards to you.
It appears that my inquiry about the demonstration earlier was over enthusiastic, a common fault of mine, but one that often in my lifetime has spurred me on to exceptional results… I think perhaps a golf ball was sitting on the “tee” in my last inquiry. Oops … (ouch!)
I have a couple questions though, if you can respond please.
1) Is Sigma 5 prior to the presentation very likely (10%, 50%, 95%?) ?
2) Is the presentation to be hosted at
A) your work facility,
B) an industrial work area (or “other”), or
C) a typical hotel seminar venue?
Luke 12:29-31 may provide you with some peace today if you have a moment.
https://www.jw.org/en/publications/bible/nwt/books/luke/12/
Thank you, Andrea!
Tom and Alice
Tom Conover:
1- 90%
2- B
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi:
Have you decided the duration of the planned October demonstration? The longer the duration, the more credibility it will instill in the viewers. Any possibility of letting the demonstration run unattended for days with cameras letting the viewers view the data being produced?
Drew G.
We will see what we can reasonably do.
Warm Regards
A.R.
67% of time it will be ssm
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
as you pointed out, you need 24V DC (eg from two series-connected 12V car batteries) to keep the reactor of the E-Cat QX in operation, my question is, do you plan for the presentation in October also a demonstration of a Self Sustain Mode, so that the E-Cat QX reactor (or several reactors in series) generates sufficient charging current to maintain the 24V operating voltage of the car batteries?
Thanks in advance and all the best!
Uwe Doms
https://thenewfire.wordpress.com/
Dear Andrea,
It is a relieve for us that you write more openly about your E-cats. The pressure of the NDA must have been heavy on you and I am sure it is also a pleasure for you not being limited in your words anymore.
Just a few questions if you will allow me:
1. Is the 1 Ohm resistor essential for the operation of the E-cat QX?
2. If the E-cat QX reaches the 5 sigma, will you then still consider making low temperature E-cats, or will all future E-cats be based on E-cat QX or further developed E-cats in the ‘hot series’?
Thank you, kind regards, Gerard
Gerard McEk:
1- confidential
2- premature
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi: You said the 20 kW failed reactors were charged by IH. Did IH know you had the 250 kW reactors in reserve?
Bernie Koppenhofer:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
JPR:
Still toward Sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The resistance of the E-Cat QX is close to zero, because it id an electric conductor, correct? Did you measure its resistance?
Regards,
Peter
Peter:
Yes, it is a conductor, same conductivity of the silver, more or less. Yes, we measured its resistance.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Dr. Rossi,
It sounds like you are saying that a 24 volt battery can drive both the control system and power the Ecat.
Can you tell us how many watts the control system consumes?
Mike Phalen:
No and it is not relevant to the COP of the E-Cat QX. By the way, I can say that such consume mainly is due to the cooling system and the heat can be recovered. We have a strong overheating of the electronic components due to the high temperature of the reactor that by conductivity through the copper cables reaches the circuitry. It has been a struggle against the time: how to exchange heat soon enough and efficiently enough to avoid the burn of some essential component. We burnt a lot of control systems before finding the solution, because the normal thermostatic systems were useless, due to the time lapsed between the set and the real exchange of enough heat to save the components. It seems stupid, but it was not. We tried without success all the traditional systems, but for one reason or another, they were either not efficient or too “dirt” ( like immersing all in dielectric oil). Most of our unreliability issues came from this problem. At the end we found the solution.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
How many 20W E-Cat QX reactors would you be able to operate from a single control box like the one you used in the recent Gullstroem-Rossi paper?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
One hundred.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
During the demo of the E-Cat QX will you give detailed information of it?
Godspeed,
W.
Willy:
We will give information about what is not confidential, for obvious reasons.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
From the picture in the Gullstroem-Rossi paper, and your information that E-Cat QX is fed by plain DC, I should derive that She has a heartbeat.
Which explains the other picture of you with the stethoscope !
And from the beating of her heart, you can know how hot or excited she is.
Maybe 5 sigma corresponds a number of hearbeats ?
Heartfull regards,
Koen
Koen Vandewalle:
He,he,he…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi
Is the E-Cat QX an electric conductor or does it have a resistance ?
Anonymous:
The E-Cat QX has the same conductivity of Ag.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear mr Rossi,
Regarding the Rossi-Gullstrom paper:
The total power supply was not mentioned, but some say you used a 24 V battery?
If this is correct your total input power to the experiment setup would be 24V * 0,1 A = 2,4 Watts.
Can you confirm the battery voltage?
Regards
Lande
Oystein Lande:
Our power source can be either 120 or 220 V AC, or we can use 24V DC batteries.
Obviously your calculation is wrong, because one thing is the voltage at the power source, a totally different thing is the voltage that goes to the E-Cat through the circuitry of the control system.
In the same Gullstroem-Rossi paper you can read the voltage measured by the 2 voltmeters.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
You write that the performance and the installation dimensions depend on the heat exchanger. Does this mean that the E-cat QX is a one-size-fits-all product, for which you make an adapter for the heated medium and temperature range depending on the application?
To make it conclusive: Imagine that I want to build a cooking pot to bake fries or fondue in 180 ° C vegetable oil. Then I have to leave with a series of 100 E-cat QX that I build in a housing with a surface of 150cm² that is then immersed in the oil in the cooking pot. The operating regime will then be: 5 minutes full of power, to heat the cooking pot with 2 litres of oil, then on average one and a half minutes “on” and half a minute “turned off” during baking. Normally this is regulated with a simple thermostat, and the cooktop manufacturer should not be concerned with the operation and control of the E-cat QX. The E-Cat QX is then integrated in a blackbox that can deliver to a maximum temperature (200°C) and maximum power (2000 Watt) on a set surface (150cm²).
The same device I can use, with other on / off times, to cook soup and potatoes or rice.
For the meat and the fish I would suggest a kind of grill. Someone of your team will think about something based on the experiments that work with heat radiation.
After the meal, I can use the cooker to heat water to wash the dishes.
I think everybody in the world wants such a device.
If we live a little bit sober, we can fulfill 90% of our basic household energy requirement with such a heater.
The blackbox and standalone character of the application must allow to get certification and to put the device quickly and easily in every supermarket.
Even if the whole world would have cheap energy, that cookie would still be useful. I do not like to throw away devices because someone else thinks I need to buy a new one.
In the developed world, we can then use the grid for other useful things, and manage this grid intelligently to pay off the current heavy investment in renewable energy.
Now a few tricky questions, because it tells about the performance of the E-cat QX: Would I have enough of 7.4 watt-hour small power bank (USB 5V output) to cook a meal (4kWh) with my cooking pot? Or should I buy a larger power bank? Or can’t we use a standard 1 Ampere USB plug to produce 2000 Watt with the 100-array E-cat QX ? Anyway, I would like the device with external power and without integrated batteries.
Kind Regards,
Koen
Koen Vandewalle:
The heat exchangers can be different, depending on their employment.
The COP of the E-Cat does not depend on the efficiency of the heat exchanger. The COP of the system depends on it.
The E-Cat QX can use as a power source either a regular AC plug or series of batteries able to supply 24 V. In the first case we apply an inverter to get DC. The E-Cat QX works only with DC.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr.Rossi, have you already found why the smallest E-Cat didn’t work in the 1MW plant?
Kind Regards
Italo R.
Italo R.:
No, we have to analyse each of them.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr Rossi,
You are now analysing the small 20 kW reactors that failed immediately after the beginning of the 1 year test of the 1 MW E-Cat, so that you had to make the test with the 4 big reactors of 250 kW each of power.
I know the 4 259 kW reactors had been made and charged by you.
Were the 20 kW reactors made and charged by IH?
Do you suspect intentional sabotage? incorrect methods of manufacture? plain stupidity?
Steve Swatman:
Yes, the 20 kW E-Cats LT had been charged by IH while I was in Doral to prepare the factory. We have to investigate the reactors to understand.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Oggi mi hanno riferito dell’ennesima bufala!!!!!
Qualcuno va a dire in giro che lei avrebbe vinto a tennis con sua moglie.
Prima che questa fake news prenda un empleur pericolosa la prego di smentirla ufficialmente.
Buon lavoro
😉
ENGLISH/LATIN:
Today I have been informed about the umpth B.S.: you won again a tennis match against your wife: usque tandem will you tolerate these innuendos? Please deny this slander before it becomes common and shared knowledge.
Pietro F.
Pietro F.:
This is a slander !!!
I lost 6-0, 6-0 !!!
Usque tandem or not as it might be !!!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
LENR Forum is full of comments of Jed Rothwell and Dewey Weaver that continue to insult your work.
We all know, because it has been put in evidence by the papers of the trial of the litigation Rossi Vs Darden, that Jed Rothwell is an Advisor of IH and Dewey Weaver is a consultant of IH and also we read on the papers of the litigation that these two individuals combined cashed from IH hundreds thousand dollars from IH, but they continue to represent themselves as neutral experts of LENR. Note: none of them has an education beyond the middle schools, none of them has education in Physics, being one of them a translator of English language and the other some sort of a patent consultant, not being anyway a patent attorney or a patent engineer…
This having been said, I have the following questions to put, if you can answer:
1) what do you think of the LENR Forum?
2) why you do not sue them for damages?
3) why do you not respond or react to their comments?
Cheers,
Giovanni De Magistris
Giovanni:
1- I do not read LENR Forum
2- they did not cause damages to us
3- I have better things to do than feed a bunch of trolls
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
The temperature of the water will be measured by means of the thermometer in the photo of the Gullstrom-Rossi paper?
Anonymous:
No, we’ll use Omega certified K probe.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I tested the Prominent pump and you were 100% right!
Godspeed,
Al
Al:
You can find also precise information about this issue on the brochure of the same pump, that is easy to pull from the internet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
JPR:
All well with the E-Cat QX.
Today we are also working with the reactors that we have disassembled from the 1 MW plant, to analyse the charges and we are finding important information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Just asking for a clarification, if you don’t mind:
In the latest Rossi-Gullstrom paper you report under energy input: V=0.1 R=1 Ohm → W=0.01
You explained to me in our interview that the E-Cat has a resistance, but you did not include it to keep the resistance of the E-Cat confidential, and this meant that the COP was conservative.
My question: does this mean that the 0.1 V is the voltage across the resistance of the E-Cat and the 1 Ohm resistor combined?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
What I said is that should the E-Cat have an R the measurements would be conservative.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You answered to Michel:
“Actually, the resistor is at room temperature.”
This is reasonable since the input power is about 0.01W. But the Ecat QX output power is about 20W.
Does this means that
1) the coil is bigger and far away from the Ecat surface?
2) the fluid circulates in contact with the Ecat, taking away the heat and leaving the coil at almost room temperature (or at most at water temperature)?
3) the only stimulation is the constant magnetic field?
4) or that a pulsed current to generate RF pulses is superimposed as I suggested many times, to replicate in small scale a magnetic resonance gantry?
5) if the answer to 4) is no, could you please try to superimpose some RF train to test my theory? A sinusoidal pulse, convoluted with a sinc pulse, with main frequency 43.5*B MHz is the best, calculating B with the known formula of a solenoid…
Regards,
Marco.
Marco:
I cannot give further information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Congratulations for:
-your settlement with IH and your sole IP ownership
– your health recovery
– and your E-Cat QX development with a COP = 2000
Questions:
1- will this COP be confirmed for the industrial applications?
2- if you stacc the E-Cat QXes together what could be the dimensions, for example for a 1 MW plant, including the heat exchanger?
3- if the diameter of a module is 10 mm, could it be possible to include 10 x 10 modules in a 10 x 10 cm?
Thank you for your answers,
Ulrich W.A.Kranz
Ulrich W.A. Kranz:
1- It has to be experimented
2- depends on the kind of the heat exchanging system. The generator itself can stay in less than a cubic meter
3- no, because you must leave the room necessary to the heat exchange. All the dimensions depend on the kind of the heat exchanging system
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I am Italian and I am one of the first to believe in you. When do you think I have it in Italy? Is the email list always valid? Can I change mail and how can I do it ?
Paolo:
Thank you for your sustain.
The email list is always valid and you can change email when you want.
When we will start in Europe, we will start also in Italy.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
This is to let your readers know about the latest and very interesting interview at ECW by Mr. Frank Acland “Interview with Andrea Rossi on Current and Future Developments of the E-Cat
Posted on July 22, 2017”.
http://e-catworld.com/2017/07/22/interview-with-andrea-rossi-on-current-and-future-developments-of-the-e-cat/
Best wishes
Luis
Luis Navarro:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
As a person devoted to solving third-world problems, you may be interested in the following news by Finnish scientists: Protein produced from electricity to alleviate world hunger, https://www.lut.fi/web/en/news/-/asset_publisher/lGh4SAywhcPu/content/protein-produced-from-electricity-to-alleviate-world-hunger .
They succeed in producing protein-rich food from hydrogen and CO2, with no green plants needed. “The method releases food production from restrictions related to the environment.” The press release is worth reading in its entirety.
regards, /pekka
Pekka Janhunen:
Very interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
What happened to the $50,000,000 invested in IH by the British Investment company Woodford
on the basis of IH having the US rights for the ecat which they now no longer have?
could you shed light on this?
Best.
Coco:
It is no more my business.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
About the Rossi-Gullstrom paper, input power measurment:
To be perfect, it would be preferable to serialise an ammeter with the input while measuring the input voltage: a resistor is temperature dependant, so it can lead to a false input power measurement.
P=U²/R supposes the brown resistor is stable, which is not certain. People could ask you about this during the presentation.
Regards,
Michel
Michel:
Actually, the resistor is at room temperature.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
JPR:
Today great internal test.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi
1. Is the E-Cat QX demo using a single 20 watt module or multiple together?
2. If multiple units, will they be in a production ready design, a pre-production design, or a prototype design nothing like the product which will goto market?
Many Thanks
Mark Saker
Mark:
Single.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi:
The picture of an E-Cat QX was recently posted in the Rossi-Gullstrom paper. It appears much larger than the dimensions you presented earlier. i.e. (length 2 cm Diam 0.6 cm Rating 20 W Warm Regards A.R.) Was this a different version of the reactor with different dimensions for purposes of the experiment?
Drew G.:
The dimensions you see are the dimensions of the calorimeter. The E-Cat QX is inside and has the dimensions you correctly reported.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Your latest paper you made with Gullström cause many discussions on ECW.
My assumption is that the E-cat QX generates a voltage while in operation. This voltage is being used to control the current through the QX. If the QX is off and you want to switch it on the control system needs to supply a voltage, which is about to be reduced to zero when the QX is started.
Just to end these discussions: Does this describe the control of the QX close enough?
Thank you for answering our questions.
Kind regards, Gerard
Gerard McEk:
I am not going to release more information before the presentation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
As many others, I am looking forward to seeing the demonstration of your E-Cat QX.
Could you clarify if the input of the reactor is
A. Plain DC, or
B. Pulsed (or otherwise nonlinear) DC?
Best regards,
Andreas Moraitis
Andreas Moraitis:
Plain DC
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi:
I was surprised at you comment as regards the 1 MW E-Cat that had been run for 1 year.
“Now we are dismounting all the reactors, the bigger ones and the small ones that did not work.” My impression had been that all the reactors were the same size, had been made according to the Lugano design, and that they all had worked? What were the “small ones”?
And why did you decide to vary your cell design for such an important test?
Best of luck with your E-Cat QX R&D.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Daniel G. Zavela:
The 1 MW E-Cat was made by LT E-Cats.
Lugano Experiment has been made with a Hot Cat.
Warm Regards
A.R.
compliments
E-Cat QX Picture Posted in New Rossi-Gullstrom Paper (COP of 2000 reported with Calorimetry)
http://e-catworld.com/2017/07/20/e-cat-qx-picture-posted-in-new-rossi-gullstrom-paper/
Nucleon polarizability and long range strong force from σI=2 meson exchange potential
Carl-Oscar Gullström, Andrea Rossi
18 july 2017
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.05249.pdf
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the link
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Will you make also an alalysis of the isotopes of the charges that have passed the one year test of Doral?
Paul:
Yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
P.S.
Your comment is the #38 000 of this blog
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congrats for the Gullstrom- Rossi paper: it seems after the end of the litigation you are reborn
Anonymous:
Thanks
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I like the idea to make the demonstration as simple as possible, just heating water. It can then be possible to use a closed water system, an aquarium of eg 40 liters. The heated water is poured out above the water surface so it is possible to put a cup and measure the time it will take to fill the cup, thus eleminating discussions of flow measurements. It is also easy to put an extra thermometer in the cup to determine the output temperature.
It is also good to use a standard lead car battery as the only power source.
So when the E-Cat QX heats the water tank more then 15 C and there is still power in the battery everyone should be convinced of a COP >1
Best Regards,
Karl-Henrik, Sweden
Karl-Henrik Malmqvist:
The system will be very simple and easy to understand.
It has already been decided.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
like your discovery Yesterday:
http://news.stanford.edu/2017/07/20/evidence-particle-antiparticle/
After 80 years E. Majorana surprises everyone with its absolute genius.
Now it’s your turn….may the force be with you!
Gian Luca:
Thank you for the link and for your sustain to our Team.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations to you and to the Swedish physicist Carl Oscar Gullstrom for your last publication on Arxiv Physics:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703-05249-pdf
Prof:
Thank you. Much theoretical work remains to be done to explain the experiment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
JPR:
Still on our way toward Sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Andrea,
Q1: Will the new data from the one year plant data
integrate into your Sigma calculations?
Q2: Is the one year plant the same as THE PLANT at
the presentation?
I hope so …
Tom
Tom Conover:
A1: no, nothing to do with the Sigma calculations of the E-Cat QX, because the Sigma is calculated only on the data from the operation of the E-Cat QX.
A2: no, the presentation will be made with the module of the E-Cat QX
Sorry to disappoint your hope…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
I tested the Prominent pump of the photo in the report of Smith and discovered that you are right: if you pump water through a pipe 20 meters high it has a flow rate of about 32.5 liters per hour, but when I cut the column to 1 meter it pumped 68 liters per hour !
You were right. Also in the data sheet available on the internet, 32 l/h is reported as the minimum flow rate at 2 bars.
Warm Regards,
DT
DT:
True.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Is the 1 MW E-Cat still sealed?
Thank you if you can answer,
Gene
Gene:
No, the plant has been returned in our full possession.
Now we are dismounting all the reactors, the bigger ones and the small ones that did not work: now we have to go through a long and very important work of analysis of all the components and of all the charges, to see what happened during the 352 days of operation. It will be very interesting also to study all the possible negative effects made by the sudden shut down and the following one year and four months of sealed stop. It will be a collection of very precious information, useful for our R&D.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I read in the interview of Mats Lewan
https://animpossibleinvention.com/blog/
that the water pumps had a capacity superior to the amount measured by the flowmeter of the ERV: is it because the pumps were redundant and regulated to give you the necessary amount of water?
Cheers
86Lorenzo:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Greetings, Andrea!
Your willpower appears to be as powerful as the science you produce. Congratulations for your decision to host the presentation for industrialists. Plain and simple calorimetry, with output beyond mankind’s ability at this moment to even dream about! The water will flow through “THE PLANT”. I am frequently guilty of overstatements, so I just want to say that if what I read is really capitalized like I just wrote, it will be one heck of a rodeo at the show! Even if the water flows through “the plant”, I am sure it will be mesmerizing.
Be sure to have some T-Shirts for sale (or free) at the show. You know what to print on them! Just one more thought, based on the link and reference below, be sure to give “Popular Science” a reason to print another 5 page spread about you after your presentation, they would be sure to appreciate it if you served a cup of tea to any of your guests that would enjoy one. You can use a regular teapot plugged into an outlet if you want, but it just might be a good idea to feature an “E-Cat QX” logo on the teapot too. Brewed with just the right “QX”.
Light ’em up! Go Rossi Team!
Thank you for all your hard work,
Tom Conover
——————————————————
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54964-2004Nov16_4.html
Warming Up to Cold Fusion
When the August 2004 issue of Popular Mechanics, the magazine for hobbyists and car enthusiasts, ran a cover story claiming cold fusion could allow terrorists to build homemade hydrogen bombs, Park derided the magazine and the science. “A nuke? The cold fusion guys can’t brew a cup of tea,” the column teased.
Park’s reference to tea was a throwback to another cold fusion critic with a humorous edge. Douglas Morrison, a Scottish physicist, was for years the lone critic to attend the annual cold fusion conferences. Every year he would ask the group, “Please can I have a cup of tea?” — a sardonic way of pointing out that cold fusion had yet to produce even the simplest heating device capable of boiling water. Morrison died in 2001, still without his cup of tea.
——————————————————
PS … they’re waiting for their “tea”, Andrea!
Tom Conover:
Thank you for your sustain and enthusiasm.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
We are very enthusiast of your demo with the Ecat QX.
Will it be in live streaming?
Janet:
I think so.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
JPR:
Good standing also today, so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The measurements you will make on the Ecat QX during the presentation of October will be based on the Wien and Boltzmann equation as the ones described in the Gullstrom-Rossi paper?
Thank you,
Rick
Rick:
No, It will be plain and simple calorimetry. We will have a flow of water that will not change phase, well below 100 Celsius degrees, a measurement of the water flowing through the plant and a measurement of the delta T and of the electric energy consumed by the E-Cat QX. Plain and simple.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi:
You have announced an October E-cat QX demonstration. Do you plan to invite representatives from US and/or Swedish government agencies? If so, I suggest invitations to representatives from the US DOE, DARPA, NASA, Army, Navy, USAF and EPA. They should welcome your technology as a breakthrough for all US energy requirements.
Drew G.:
Thank you for the suggestion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments received in other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Congratulations on both the settlement and your medical recovery, I am very much looking forward to the presentation on the E-cat QX in October. I selfishly request the 27th October for the presentation. After so many faithful years following your progress, it would be a very nice birthday present!!
I would say good luck, but you do not need it
Mark:
I see what I can do!
Thank you for your kind sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
JPR:
Also today is a very good day,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
If even the great Prof. Focardi was convinced that the solution of the LENR is the resonance, I am more and more convinced that magnetic resonance can be a topic worth to explore… Hydrogen atoms aligned in a nickel lattice and pushed in sync by a calibrated RF pulse… I wonder what that hydrogen atoms will experience in that condition…
You don’t even need costly magnetic resonace apparatus. Just measure or calculate or calibrate magnetic field generated by the coil, and add an RF pulse of frequency 43.5 * B MHz over the DC component…
Regards,
Marco.
Marco:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I have read the interview of Mats and I’m happy to see and hear you
so well. The settlement agreement is the confirmationt that your work is real
and fantastically outstanding.
Great job.
Thanks
Gian Luca:
Thank you for your sustain.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I read the interview you allowed to Mats Lewan on https://animpossibleinvention.com/blog/
In the photos there is, behind you, a painting with a tiny sailboat in a stormy sea, a very beautiful painting. Who is the painter?
Cheers
Fulco
Fulco:
The painter is Silvia Magnani, a milanese painter, laureate of the Accademia di Brera of Milan, probably among the best living Italian painters.
She knows me since when I was 25 years old and I always asked her to paint for me boats in a stormy sea, a subject that I love, I do not know why. Two years ago I asked her to paint for me a sail boat in a stormy sea, trying to survive a tsunami made by waves piled one upon the other, like resonances of virtual particles ( Prof Sergio Focardi told me ” the theoretical solution of the LENR will come from resonances” and I can’t forget that phrase ). She asked me: ” So, you still are a boat in the storm ? All right, I paint you your boat ” and I keep it where I have my desk where I study. It represents a stormy sea, with a tsunami made by many waves one upon the other, with a tiny and small sailboat, barely visible, but floating upon the tsunami, with a Sun in the horizon that begins to shine among the clouds. I love this painting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat
to find comments published on other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
https://animpossibleinvention.com/blog/
Great article!Love this!Perfect.Thanks for sharing.
Dear Andrea Rossi ,
I have just read your interview with Mats Lewan, now it is time for the lunch of the E-CAT QX rocket !!
Exciting time ahead !!
I wish you great sucess !!
Warm regards,
Toussaint françois
Toussaint Francois:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I have just read in Mat Lewans blog : https://animpossibleinvention.com/blog/
Here’s The Settlement—Getting The License Back Was Rossi’s Top Priority
My congratulations and it is very nice to see your smile!!
All the very best
Luis
Luis Navarro:
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Here’s The Settlement—Getting The License Back Was Rossi’s Top Priority
In the settlement between Rossi and his US licensee IH, Rossi got the license back together with all E-Cat equipment and materials, while none of the parties will have to pay damages to the other. Getting the license back was his top priority all the time, Rossi explains in this interview.
Documents:
The document defining the terms of the settlement
Rossi’s notes addressing the Expert Report by Rick Smith.
Rossi’s notes regarding arguments raised by Joseph A. Murray.
https://animpossibleinvention.com/2017/07/18/heres-the-settlement-getting-the-license-back-was-rossis-top-priority/
Fusion: Will Humanity Ever Harness Star Power?
Today’s video, by the talented team at Kurzgesagt, explains how fusion works, what experiments are ongoing, and the pros and cons of pursuing fusion power generation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZsaaturR6E
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-17/fusion-will-humanity-ever-harness-star-power
Dear Dr. Rossi,
“There is not one miracle solution to combat climate change: there are solutions which we must learn to operate together …
allowing nature’s energies, as well as those of our society, to collaborate …”
Victorien Erussard, Captain of the hydrogen vessel “Energy Observer”
http://www.energy-observer.org/
Warm regards.
msclvr:
I agree
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
JPR:
On our way toward Sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Mr. Rossi
in March 2017 a report from Mr. Gullstöm and you was published in ArchivX, which has some open questions.
Is an updated version of that paper in the making ?
Greetings
DvH
DvH:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi: Just do not understand why you are proceeding to another “presentation” or demonstration, when we know some nut case will say there is a secret wire running under the building to provide the power to your E-Cat Qx, and “people” will believe him. Why not simply give, loan, lease your E-Cat Qx to a company needing heat and let them tell the world how much money they are saving?
Bernie Koppenhofer:
I am not making demos for “nuts”. It is time to ignore “nuts”. This is why I always stay well away from the pond of the frogs.
But you are right, we are also going to sell our industrial apparatuses.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Domestic E-CAT ? Before 2018 ?
Umbi:
This is a knife turned in the wound: doesn’t depend on me, see certification issue.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
better to target zero emissions than 100% renewable energy ( The Economist , Jul 13th 2017 )
https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21725001-goal-after-all-curb-global-warming-not-favour-particular-technologies-better
Best regards.
msclvr:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
The “five sigma”, this stranger
http://www.lescienze.it/news/2012/07/23/news/cinque_sigma_bosone_higgs-1164438/
https://understandinguncertainty.org/higgs-it-one-sided-or-two-sided
Ing Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for this clarifying link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Do We See even more Indications of Eric Walker being an Anti-LENR Astroturfing Professional?
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/do-we-see-even-more-indications-of-eric-walker-being-an-anti-lenr-astroturfing-professional/
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Do you think in future your Ecat QX will be employed also in internal combustion engines and jet engines?
George Dvorak:
Yes, I think so.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
JPR:
Still on our way toward Sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I am very pleased to read that you plan to demonstrate the E-cat QX in October. It shows that you are confident of the outcome of the 5 sigma test.
Just one question regarding this demonstration: To whom will you demonstrate it?
A. Anybody who want to see it
B. Press and other media
C. Invitees (Would you be willing to invite me?)
D. Scientific groups
E. Investors
Thanks and kind regards, Gerard McEk
Gerard McEk:
TBD
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Joseph Fine:
1- First things first:
Another winning is not impossible, because in Physics nothing is impossible, but just associated to a probability ratio and tennis is Physics in essence.
2- I think in the USA and Sweden
3- Yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
JPR:
On our way toward Sigma 5,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea Rossi:
Will the E-Cat QX demonstration be in the United States, Sweden or another country?
Will the E-Cat QX demo and/or technical presentation be accessible via the Internet (either slides, pictures and/or videos)?
Can the probability of winning another Tennis set against your most worthy opponent be estimated? Or is it sufficient to have done it once to show it is not impossible?
High regards,
Joseph Fine
Dr Rossi,
Elon Musk discussed energy sources in the future …
Elton Says:
“As for those pushing some other type of fusion,
Musk notes that the sun is a giant fusion reactor
in the sky. “It’s really reliable,”
he said. “It comes up every day.
if it doesn’t we’ve got (other) problems)”
** Elon Musk must have heard of a LENR DEMO in October.
Dear Andrea,
You say that the settlement agreement has been signed.
1) Will a joint statement by attorneys from both parties still be published?
2) If so, when do you expect that will happen?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
1- I do not know
2- n.a.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I read http://www.ingandrearossi.com
Your life is inspiring.
Godspeed
Anonymous:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Has the settlement agreement been signed?
Newyorker:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
JPR:
Also today in good standing,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
could you please clarify what is the correct spelling of your trademark, because I want to use the correct version in my reporting. On ecat.com and on e-cat.com (with leads to hydrofusion.com) it is a mixture of both but mostly called ECAT, but there are also Version with E-Cat or E-CAT and on your journal here you use e-cat. Thanks in advance!
I wish you all the best for your October presentation of the Quark X.
All the best yours
Uwe Doms
https://thenewfire.wordpress.com/
Uwe Doms:
The version we prefer is E-Cat ( Energy Catalyzer ). The QuarkX has now a final name: E-Cat QX.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am enthusiast to know that in October the E-Cat QX will be presented in a demo.
Bravo!
Anonymous:
Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
What will be the purpose of your planned presentation? Who will be the audience you are aiming to reach?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Just make a public demonstration of the E-Cat QX.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, I believe you have decided on the name of your next generation of e cat but have you considered the new name to be quark x,e cat series 2. Just a thought but it could indicate a progressive state of an established technology. Regards Eric Ashworth
Eric Ashworth:
We decided to call it just E-Cat, our registered trade mark. QX will define the model, as LT, or HT.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
I have no doubt the presentation of the Quark-X will be a great success, but what suite do you plan to give?
– Will you have the ability to produce on a large scale, perhaps are you already in touch with an industrialist for whom production is the job?
– Don’t you fear that certification will be very delayed for domestic versions, as it is for the old Ecat (2012), which themselves depend on feedback from a possible industrial version of the Quark-X?
Michel
**Today is the Bastille-Day, to which President Trump will be present**
Michel:
Let me complete my answer:
About the certification of the domestic: yes, there can be issues in the short term and the timing of it does not depend on us
Bastille Day: what a momentous event of History!
This is a fundamental recurrence not only for France, but for all the World.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
First i am happy for you the trial is closed. Now you can focus again on the new reactor.
My questions :
– How will you organize the presentation of the Quark-X, do you plan to invite some Scientists or Scientific Media? Despite its obvious interest, the Lugano report still stay unknown for most of them.
– About the quark-X: did you evaluated the effect of a pure DC constant current versus DC constant voltage ?
Regards,
Michel
Michel:
For now, let me maintain covered our strategy.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
for all italians readers that don’t speak english so well….
Your “settlement” mean: 1)accordo – 2)liquidazione 3)definizione 4)transazione?
It seems to me an important thing
Thanks.
Gian Luca:
In English “settlement” means “transazione”.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
JPR:
We are in good standing with the E-Cat QX.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Prof:The Dark Matter is necessary to explain the gravitational pull that makes the universe to expand
You are wrong about Dark Matter!
You are talking about DARK ENERGIE!
Bang99:
Gravity comes from mass and distance: to have gravity you need matter.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations for the settlement. Now you can dedicate yourself to the E-Cat for a better world.
Godspeed
Anonymous:
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Prof
“July 12, 2017 at 10:04 AM
The Dark Matter is necessary to explain the gravitational pull that makes the universe to expand, but it is not conciliated with the Standard Model, as well as the Rossi effect.”
Dark Matter is a binding force, it does not make the universe expand! It’s binding stars to rotating galaxies, as the simplest explanation.
What you are describing is Dark Energy:
Dark Energy is defined as a force, making the universe expanding.
Dark energy makes up approximately 68% of the universe and appears to be associated with the vacuum in space. It is distributed evenly throughout the universe, not only in space but also in time – in other words, its effect is not diluted as the universe expands. The even distribution means that dark energy does not have any local gravitational effects, but rather a global effect on the universe as a whole. This leads to a repulsive force, which tends to accelerate the expansion of the universe.
The rate of expansion and its acceleration can be measured by observations based on the Hubble law.
http://home.cern/about/physics/dark-matter
Dear Andrea:
In your response to Anonymous you wrote that you have filed the form CYAB: what is it?
Cheers
Robert
Robert:
CYAB = acronym that stays for ” Cover Your Ass Baby “.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buon giorno Andrea.
> Ieri ero, prima in zona Belgirate/Lesa, poi sono stato a trovare i
> parenti a Gessate; passando per Pessano con Bornago, Cambiago.
> Non ho potuto fare a meno di pensare al Lei, alla sua avventura e al
> fatto che il “cambiamento” che trasformerà la storia dell’uomo moderno sia
> partito da qui.
> Un caro saluto dal Lago Maggiore.
ENGLISH SYNOPSYS:
Good Morning, Andrea:
Yestarday during a trip to meet my relatives near Caponago I couldn’t avoid to think to your past work in Italy with your factory of Caponago ( Milan, Italy ).
I couldn’t avoid to think to your work to produce a game-changer in the field of new energies.
Gian Luca:
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
No, Sigma 5 is close to have been reached with the module. Piling up modiles will be matter of eventual industrialization.
We still are in an R&D phase, but at a very advanced stage, enough advanced to make a strong presentation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Toussaint Francois:
When it will be ready, yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
There are some who are a little disappointed in your statement you intend to start by selling heat. All I can say is don’t be disappointed. If all Leonardo sells is a device the produces that lowly product heat, you can power the world.
Our combustion engines that power our vehicles and machines are but heat engines. The heat is provided by the combustion of fossil fuel that super heats the compressed air that drives the engine. Jet engines and gas turbines are also heat engines that greatly expand compressed air. Keep in mind, air is a gas. Rocket engines are the same principle except the burning oxygen/hydrogen also acts as the expanded gases. E-cat QX may have a place in rockets as well. Just superheated hydrogen as the propellant. No burning necessary.
All accomplished by the lowly heat.
Regards,
Dan C.
Dan C.:
You are correct.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Have you ever experienced or tried to integrate your device into a home heating system or use it in a residential facility?
Thanks for the work you’ve done here and that you will do in the next delicate months.
Gian Luca:
Yes, in the factory in Italy, together with Prof Sergio Focardi.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi
Has the ratio of electricity to heat to light production changed at all. In previous Xcat electricity production was approx 10% from memory.
Good to see you have your excitement back
Manuel Cilia:
Not yet.
Warmest Regards,
A.R.