Rossi Blog Reader
This website tracks recent postings to Andrea Rossi's
Journal of Nuclear Physics,
sorting the entries with priority to Rossi's answers, which appear under each question.
• Email to Andrea Rossi - Journal Of Nuclear Physics
• Website comments to the Webmaster (who has no contact or connection with Rossi).
• Updated: 2019-09-18 18:00:06.228313Z
Steven N. Karen’s:
1- yes
2- yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
How is the progress of your testing going these days?
What do you think will be the end result of all the testing you are doing, and do you expect to demonstrate the E-Cat SK Leonardo in 2019?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
We are doing very well, I still am optimist about launching the Ecat SK Leonardo with permanent ssm this year.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Regarding the revision to the theoretical understanding, has this:
1. Improved the electrical generation conversion efficiency?
2. Is there any impact on control stability?
Dr Rossi
Is there a preferential thread in the theoretical sources described in
http://Www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Thanks if you can answer
Carroll
Carroll Sachar:
I think it is more probable an integration of all of them.
Warm Regards
A.R.
US gas production more than match for rising generation demand
Rod Walton
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the info
Warm Regards
A.R.
What do you think of the presentation of the last R&D made by Dr Alexander Parkomov at the ICCF in Assisi last week?
Boris:
Very interesting, as always with the work of Dr Parkomov.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, I have in past posts dealt with the interacting energies of the E Cat but there are some important aspects other than these issues, although these issues are most important. What you have on a micro scale is, it appears, a system that replicates the macro system. The macro system as previously described by myself in my post of ‘the mechanism’ that describes ‘the static and mobile mechanics of energy interaction’. Your E Cat relies upon ‘the static and mobile mechanics of energy interaction’. You load into the reactor static material/energy together with hydrogen ( a type of 5th dimension) and produce a mobile field of active energy. What you are doing is transitioning energy from one state to another in the presence of a gravitational field. In the macro system four apexes of the pyramids/triangles sit around a point of gravity, one pyramid represents a system, four pyramids represent a systemic system of the macro. Each pyramid contains four identifiable structures, one of course is fuzzy being at one end of the spectrum and one solid and defined at the other. The two between are coming from and going towards in an evolutionary procession from creation to eventual destruction that are themselves two states of absolute (what I have just described is one system of the macro. In the macro, four static positives of positivity surround the gravity). The emphasis of this activity is transition. Transition is something that all structures go through because of evolution and their progression towards the apex of their pyramid due to the pull of gravity. Thereby the positive solid size aspect of the structure must gain/transition i.e. compact become more defined so as to get into a higher dimension, otherwise there is insufficient room to get in. When something compacts it warms up and becomes more dense giving off its vapour that then surrounds the structure as a halo because the structure contains gravity. This activity is important to understand, especially when it involves human evolution and the transfiguring of the structure. What I am attempting to explain is to try and put this subject into a more meaningful understanding that will overcome a problematic issue that always arrises at specific times in evolution. Clean energy provides a brighter world. It’s the understanding behind the technology/methodology and all that goes with it that is of vital importance to the overall project and its success. It is the original catch 22 situation involving a demarcation zone between intelligence and consciousness or you could say two cubes of six dimensions each. What one must ask themselves is, is this subject empirical or is based on pure logic?. The answer is, it involves both because it involves a situation that requires the understanding of binary interactions. There are four levels of intelligence that are always present at any one time from that of a fuzzy degree to that of a more defined. The more defined is able to communicate internally and thereby externally with a similar vibration/resonance or we say ‘on the same wave length’. Why is it important to segregate groups into specific departments?. Because the project, required to obtain a clean environment involves an alternative purpose, that relates to a type of important missionary work aimed at producing a more conducive climate with regards climate change. Am I straying off the subject, no but I am aware that some people will think so. Therefore to recap, every unified field that demonstrates in a physical way and by physical means ‘the static and mobile mechanics of energy interaction’ being fields of energy requires a source of energy to maintain its manufactured field. The source of this energy, dependent upon its purpose, will not only be clean but can be of a magnitude capable of producing structure/virtual particles that are capable of providing the static structure with a means of mobility outside of an atmosphere. Thereby this subject regarding energy has various levels of understanding and this is what makes the subject difficult to broadcast ‘willy nilly’ if you can understand that you do not ‘cast pearls before swine’ which is self evident when you understand the entire subject.
Regards Eric Ashworth
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Did you make calorimetric measurements as you did in the demo of thre Presentation of the Ecat QX on November 24 2017 in Stockholm also for the SK shown in
http://www.ecatskdemo.com ?
C.V.:
Yes, as you can see clearly in
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
in the last part of it.
We also made same measurements using water.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Is it correct to assume that the highest density of your IP about the Ecat SK Leonardo is in the control of the resonances?
C.T.:
Resonances are important. Prof Focardi and I have been aware from the beginning that resonances are a key of this effect.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
This blog is fantastic, its 48000comments and their links are the encyclopedia of the anomalous energies
Anonymous:
Thank you ! So, the time we dedicate to it is not wasted.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Thank you for having published on
http://www.ecatsk.com
the test of the Ecat SK
Best Regards,
Giusy
Giuseppe:
Thanks to you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, I found it most interesting the post by Frank Ackland Sept 11th. Apparently an anonymous reader of E Cat World required Frank to forward a question to yourself with regards the Safire Project (Sapphire). An interesting project that even they state can open doors within the scientific community. It seems that certain entities and people (in the scientific community) have utilized the negative resistance regime in their plasma discharges to produce anomalies and excess energy. The question being ‘does the E Cat SK utilize the negative resistance regime. I do not believe you do because your door is always open for comments and suggestions unlike other doors that are tightly shut. Regards, Eric Ashworth.
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I watched on Youtube “Ecat QX demo in Stockholm November 24 2017”.
The QX was obviously much smaller than the SK, but that demo made at the IVA has been very precise and stunning, with a calorimetry absolutely rigorous.
Very interesting also the lecture of Carl Oscar Gullstrom.
All the best,
Bedy
Bedy:
I aree with you. Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Will Leonardo Corporation continue to sell heat also if it will be success for the direct production of electric power?
Anonymous:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof Christos Stremmenos:
Thank you for your post.
What do you think about Rossi’s statement that cold fusion does not exist and that his effect is due to nuclear interactions that have nothing to do with nuclear fusion?
Best Regards,
Jean Paul Renoir
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I am glad it sounds like E-Cat SK/Leonardo could become a reality not too far
from now.
If so, will you also combine it with a turbine to create the E-Cat SK/Leonardo-IP
(Independent Power) a grid-independent generator for typical situations/locations
lacking power.
Kind regards
Sven B
Sven B.:
That is a hypothesis.
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Your paper
http://www.researchnet.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
continues its stunning viral diffusion: now it is the most read of the 15 millions publications on Researchgate. The revolutionary theoretical plant you put there, combined with the experimental setup also shown in
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
has triggered a worldwide interest in all the continents.
Ad majora!
Prof
Prof:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
How is proceeding the effort to make directly electricity from the plasma and obtain a permanent ssm?
All the best,
J
Jolie:
We are still working very hard, and I am still very optimist.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Will the Ecat SK leonardo be able to produce electricity only enough to provide permanent ssm to the Ecat producing heat, or will it be able also to generate electricity for sale?
Thanks if you can answer,
F.
Flore:
Premature to answer; probably initially it will give just permanent ssm to the Ecat, eventually increasing the electricity generation, but it is premature to say.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
is the lecture that Carl Oscar Gullstrom made at the IVA of Stockholm at the presentation of the Ecat QX theoretically coherent with your paper on Researchgate ?
Anonymous:
Yes, in particular in relation to the long distance interactions.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
looks like a corpus of integrated theories that together explain the so called Rossi effect.
Do you agree?
Norma:
Yes, I agree.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Regarding the device you are experimenting with to extract electricity from the E-Cat SK charge, can this be used in reverse to induce the long running charge input electrical trigger signal, the cathode / anode connections being initially used to establish the start-up plasma then switched to allow the charge raw electrical output to be connected to a capacitor / battery / electrical conditioning system for a stabilised output.
May or may not be worth looking at, but worth a mention.
Regards,
Keith Thomson
KeithT:
It does not work that way.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
It is very exiting to read that the the theory led to a new design of the E-cad SK Leonardo and it proved to work as the theory predicted. That means that your theory is maturing and your understanding of the E-cat process has significantly improved. Congratulations to you and your team!
Just a few questions about this important step in progress, if I may:
1. Did the dimensions of the Ecat SK change much due to the new design?
2. Can you still operate the E-cat during a year without a refill?
3. Has the COP changed, which was calculated to be 56 in your ResearchGate paper?
4. Has SSM of the total assembly (reactor+controller) been accomplished?
Thank you for keeping us up to date!
Kind regards, Gerard
Gerard McEk:
1- enough
2- yes
3- premature
4- that is the key point of our R&D
Thank you for your kind attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Do you tink the Ecat will be useful for towns like Krakow, that has problems with air pollution?
Chuck Davis:
That’s what the Ecat has been born for.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr Rossi
This is a link to research on the size
of a proton.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-finally-nail-the-protons-size-and-hope-dies-20190911/
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
I noticed that on http://www.Researchgate.net the paper ” On the Nuclear Mechanisms Underlying the Heat Production by the E-Cat “, co-authored by Prof Norman Cook and you is the most read of your publications, with exception of the hit “ecat SK and long range particle interactions”, that is the most read paper of Researchgate ever.
JPR
JPR:
Thank you for notice.
The paper authored Norman D.Cook-Andrea Rossi is this:
“On the Nuclear Mechanisms Underlying the heat Production by the E-Cat”
http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.01261
published on April 10th 2015
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find other comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Any update about the R&D on course with the Ecat SK Leonardo?
Ruby:
Yesterday we made an important step forward and substantial modifications have been made to the Ecat SK Leonardo. These modifications derived not from experimental phases, but directly from theoretical considerations and this fact not only improved the system, but reinforced the theoretical bases.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
DearAnonymous Sept 8th. Is it wrong to make the hypothesis that the effect is born from the formation of antimatter. Andrea is correct but I would say first you must define antimatter to make a judgement. What you must consider is:- there are only two states of existence i.e. energy. Negative and positive being the states of matter. What other state can there be?. Not difficult to understand unless you ignore gravity i.e. a trinity of energy, positive size, negative volume being a cause and neutral the effect being a degree of at-one-ment/gravity i.e. in its various degrees with regards that of which produces the effect dependent upon the magnitude. The effect being a measurable degree of energy that relates to its source and the trigger of release.
Dear Andrea,
A reader of E-Cat World has forwarded this question to me, for me to ask you:
“SAFIRE, Brilliant Light Power, Alexander Chernetsky, Paulo Correa, and other inventors are alleged to have utilized the negative resistance regime in their plasma discharges to produce anomalies and excess energy. Does the E-Cat SK utilize the negative resistance regime?”
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
I never answer in positive or in negative to issues related to to the plasma of the Ecat. All the available information has been given on
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
and on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
I can only say that everything you can make with a plasma I did in thousands of experiments.
I am well aware of the work and the experiments of all our competitors.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
I have some questions regarding the (since 19 nov 2018) outsourced 22 KW blue box.
1. Is the thermostat controlling the outgoing watertempertur by the plasma turned off short periods or by reducing the plasmatemperatur after the customers needs?
2. Has the pioneer problems that occured, been abled to correct in place, or has the whole blue box been taken back to the Miami-factory?
Best wishes to that the serielmanufacturing can start soon.
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Nils Fryklund:
1- the control system functions are confidential
2- on site
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
I think that the technical problems you are encountering in the functioning of the E-Cat are not so important, and overall they are not the real cause that prevents their expansion.
I suspect there are other and important external causes, independent of your will or technical problems, which force you to keep a so low profile.
But I understand if you cannot explain better, perhaps I am only wrongly thinking about conspirations.
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Italo R.:
Thank you for your insight: my situation is this: I cannot make errors.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Recently you also confirmed that deliveries are still
restricted waiting for some problems to be fully resolved.
1. Am I right that you still only make installations within the USA?
2.Can you give us a scheduling about deliveries out of the USA?
Kind Regards
Sven B
Sven B:
1- yes
2- not yet
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I read your theoretical paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and my question is: you introduce different threads of theoretical ideas, respectively in par 1,2,3,4. Do you think one of these threads will prevail or you think all of them canj be considered integrated factors of the Rossi effect?
Rossi effect student:
I am thinking that they all can be integrated in one theoretical system, with the zitterbewegung of the electrons as the common denominator.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
I was wondering if you could ask
one of your customers if they could
be interviewed by Frank Acland
of E-Cat World blog.
Regards
Sam
Sam:
This does not depend on me. So far our Clients prefer not to be exposed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
on Power Engineering issue of Sep-tember 10 2019:
Sunshine State utilities prefer gas fired power for new capacity.
Rod Walton
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to read the comments published today on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I think this can be of interest for you and the readers:
Google: Tesla’s battery researcher tests 1 million mile battery cell
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
Chuck Davis:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Thank you for this wonderful post, I am glad I detected this in internet.
Your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
united with the video
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
are making history.
Giovanni Speziale
Giovanni Speziale:
Thank you for your attention to the hard work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Here is site with info on these structures.
https://www.plasma-universe.com/double-layer/
PlasmaFan:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Is it wrong to make the hypothesis that your effect is born from the formation of antimatter?
Anonymous:
It is never wrong to make a hypothesis.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
1) Does the plasma ball within the E-Cat SK achieve the Langmuir Condition which is what seems to define a “strong” double layer rather than a “weak” double layer?
2) Does the plasma ball within the E-Cat SK achieve a relativistic state?
Here is a document you might find useful.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5ff3/56d747f501d678c4da0ba2d04e33d2d24913.pdf
Thank you.
PlasmaFan:
1- no
2- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, As a follow up to my previous post that refers to structure as energy, I will now explain how to embody the previously described macro unit of energy into a useful mechanism that specifically relates to a propulsion unit that relies upon unified fields of air. The mechanism relies upon a binary system of interaction with regards its structure and also that of which it structures i.e. air. There is no name at present for this particular mechanism when the propulsion unit is installed into that of an aircraft design and therefore I shall refer to the mechanism as a ‘Unifying Field Oscillator’. Note, aircraft because this particular description refers entirely to a propulsion system that operates within an atmosphere because it uses the atmosphere to form interacting structures that provide the propulsion. It is necessary to refer back to previous notes so as to maintain clarity and understanding. The mechanism is in two parts comprising of four mobile structures that interact as binary systems and that are mounted upon a plasm constructed of four static dimensions. The plasm is a geometric metal structure formed of four triangles, apex in, enclosed within a metallic circle that forms their base (Four triangles represent a square). Another metallic circle is embedded within the central position of the triangles i.e. between point and periphery (see previous post for correct understanding). This central circle divides the triangles into two compartments. The inner compartments of size dimensions are as apposed to that of the outer compartments being of volume dimensions or positives as apposed to negatives. Thereby four positives, four negatives and four triangles and two outer dimensions. The two outer dimensions one inner and one outer to that of the four triangles represent zones of force potentials. The positives and negatives within the triangles represent four neutrals i.e. one within each pyramid, each neutral is a gate i.e. in and out of the cube via the two major gates i.e. the negative force in and the the positive force out . The combined inner and the outer represent two loops i.e. circuits of flow that circumvent the cube and insulate the cube by their oscillating helical trajectories. Thereby four neutrals and two forces equals six dimensions i.e. one cube. Now we have to project this structure into a macro dimension from that of a micro dimension to provide information of an important understanding. Every cube being a unit of energy is comprised of six dimensions. The negative compartments, structure negative cubes. The positive compartments, structure positive cubes within the macro cube because the macro cube forms a unified field of four dimensions i.e. N.S.E.West of the structure. Each dimension is formed/comprised of minor cubes that within the macro cube eventually merge over a distance that equates as a period of time forming a neutral. Before the merge each potential is of a distinct curvature oscillating force that maintains identity with regards the two potentials i.e. the positive and the negative remain as isolated units within their respective compartments. Two curvature forces, one being the positive and one being the negative that upon merging create a linear force being a force of neutral unity that occurs slowly over a period of time until full unity. It’s the linear force that provides the propulsion of the mechanism. This aspect of understanding is physically demonstrated within the mechanism. What the two units do i.e. eight in total, is descend into a more positive zone on their helical trajectories i.e. eight in total that oscillate in eventual unison because the positive unit is in the lead position dictating the necessary path to achieve a unified field. What has to be understood is that it is geometry and maths that dictates the pattern of nature i.e. the evolutionary system from a fuzzy none understanding to a clearer vision. I will now explain the physical aspects with regards the ‘Unifying Field Oscillator’ of how it is built and why, being a reference to its pattern in the greater sphere of things. The static dimension being the plasm is formed of metallic plates. The plasm is designed specifically with regards the mobile units, these being propellers with a given pitch. The propellers should have a square pitch i.e. to climb/form a cube with one rotation. Each propeller is mounted at the central position within each triangle. Each propeller blade almost touch at the apex of their triangle and each blade is mounted at a 90 degree angle to each other so as to rotate in sync without propeller strike i.e. a 50% binary overlap. The plasm must accommodate the structure formed within each compartment of each triangle. The plasm thereby has an inner and outer depth to comply with the dimension of the inner compartment to that of the outer compartment. As an example a sixteen inch propeller i.e. two eight inch blades requires each triangle to be four inches depth at the apex, three inches depth at the central position and two inches at the outer base/circle. However because of the need to accommodate an outer static dimension of force, the plasm extends out beyond the outer circle. Thereby 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 – 0 inches depth of entire plasm. 4 – 3 – 2 – being triangle compartments 2 – 1 – 0 being outer chambers to amplify the inner oscillations of the inner flows. At the outer zero position a skirt is dropped down four inches to enclose the outer chamber/chambers. Above the outer chambers and beyond is the fuselage. What this propulsion system represents is a collapsed cube forming a disk with a positive negative flow surrounded by a static boundary layer to form an insulation from environmental objects in close proximity. There are two distinct flows to the mechanism, one inner ‘internal economy flow’ that circumvents from the positive force to the negative force passing by the outer chambers on the inner side. These flows are on oscillating helical trajectories and thereby contain gravity which provides a density of structure and that thereby provide the propellers with an added lift due to a greater density of air drawn towards the apexes of the triangles from the outer bases across the plane of the propellers. What these ‘economy flows’ do is knit the structure together i.e. they unify. The outer flows do the same i.e. knits the structure together but on greater loops. This method of propulsion provides an extremely powerful thrust that is completely silent because its fields are unified. How big could this type of thruster be made?. As big as a building, depends on its purpose. It obviously needs fuel to power the system but fuel that compliments the technology i.e. whether it be an aircraft or an interplanetary vehicle (to be explained) and this is why an advanced form of clean energy is an absolute must in the near future besides being beneficial to our planet as a whole at this present time.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
In the greater scheme of things, the mechanism can be compared to containing ten planets. Each compartment contains a planet comprised of four sets that oscillates as a structure, the pivot upon which the propellers rotate represents an empty space of interacting energy i.e. sun. Consequently eight planets with one always coming in and one always going out, ten in total on a continuous never ending cycle with regards the major unit. N.S.E,W represent four seasons thereby ten.
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
This is a link to the late
Norman Cook talk at ICCF 21.
https://youtu.be/yYzrBtU_Bis
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Thank you for the link to the Professor Norman Cook’s talk at ICCF 21 !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
You said the tennis article i sent
did not help your tennis game.
But this line in the article
reminded me of you.
She plays her best when she’s up against it, fearless. Her coach Sylvain Bruneau calls her a warrior and a “street fighter” — Andreescu relishes people doubting her.
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Well, thank you ! ( he,he,he…)
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S.
This morning: 0-6
Dr. Rossi,
1) Are your clients with SK installations aware of each other?
2) Do they communicate directly with each other to collaborate on improving their installations?
A reveal of their use of your wonderful technology would be more powerful if done jointly.
Cheers,
Greg Daigle
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you for the information and for the link !
The model of the atomic nucleus of Prof Norman Cook remains the more convincing to me and is fit in the theoretical bases I proposed in my last paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
I strongly suggest the reading of this new book of our great master, Prof Norman Cook.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, At the beginning of May (four months ago) you mentioned you were having problems with the first wave of reactors and that you consider you were still in the R&D phase, not production.
Q1:Can you tell us if you have resolved these issues?
Q2:Have you been able to start or restart production and shipping of your reactors?
Q3: If you are shipping reactors, what is the current estimated delivery time?
Colin Watters:
1- we are improving
2- in part
3- it depends on the situations
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
This is a link to the historic USA
Woman’s open tennis final.
https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.5274905
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Thank you for your help, but it didn’t work: still 0-6
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi and readers of JONP,
The 3rd edition of “Models of the Atomic Nucleus” by Norman D. Cook can be ordered via the link
below.
http://www.infinite-energy.com/resources/norman-cook.html
See also:
https://www.infinite-energy.com/store/index.php?main_page=popup_image&pID=464&zenid=g1e818sbmnc5rtko3j7qod01a3&fbclid=IwAR0EojSxgso60jbUgw6W1rYUU5bnIhd0D9jozjmzqm5v5MRqoHzDF8ADQ7g
I do not have the Table of Contents for this book and, unfortunately, Dr. Norman Cook passed away about 3 months ago. If there are any questions about the books’ contents, contact Infinite-Energy Magazine.
Best regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear Steve_save_the_climate, With what I am saying will be said but you have to have patience so as to understand what I am saying. I appreciate your comment but this is not about me. It is information that I believe people need to be made aware of for consideration. It is important but only to certain individuals able to put together what I am saying so as to understand embodied concepts that are to follow and thereby arrive at a meaningful understanding at the various levels that are required i.e. with regards a persons acumen.
Regards Eric Ashworth
Dear readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
you are tryng a difficult balance between electricity and heat production in a single e-cat.
Isn’t better to use a cluster of two or more e-cats, the first tuned to get only elecricity, and with this electricity you can pilot the same e-cat (if it has a good efficiency) and also the second (or more tha two) e-cat to produce heat, or elecricity, depends on what you need?
Domenico Canino:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
In percentage terms, at this time what do you think the probability is that you will be able to demonstrate an E-Cat operating with no external source of energy input in 2019?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
Andrea, please be humble:
50.1%
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
With regards to how the reaction in the E-cat work and your recent insight that you believe the generated energy doesn’t come from mass to energy conversion:
1. Do you still believe that the energy generated by the SK plasma is based on the same principles as of the first generation lower temperature ECats?
Some other questions:
2. When you do not succeed to make SSM work for the SK Leonardo, would that stop bringing the E-cat SK to the market as a heat energy source?
3. There is a huge upcoming market for heat distribution to houses in the Netherlands. Would you be willing to supply centralized heating stations in domestic areas for that purpose?
4. If ‘no’ for 3: What is the main reason?
Thank you. Kind regards, Gerard
Gerard McEk:
1- There has been a theoretical evolution that appears evident if you go through the publications of mine, now all published on Researchgate.
2- No
3- Yes
4- N.A.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Thanks for correcting my error in the post from keV to MeV but unfortunately I suppose the remainder of that paragraph that I wrote about it being less than electron pair production is also not really correct.
Best Regards
Stephen.
Stephen:
If you want to correct your insight, please do.
The JoNP does not respond of the insights of the Readers and publish their points of view as they are.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I just found this interesting paper that could be relevant to both your work with Carl Oscar Gulström and to Holmlids work with dense Hydrogen decay. After starting to understand better the interesting concepts in your recent paper I thought it might be useful or relevant:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037026931830580X
I know you don’t discuss others work but there may be convergence in someways here.
I suspect for you the resonances could be interesting and for Holmlid the decay paths which also include decays to neutral Kaon and pion pairs in some cases.
The first two f0 type resonances are quite low energy 500 MeV and 980 MeV which is below typical nucleon resonances and even below those of electron positron pair generation.. I wonder when you talk about particle resonances in the e-cat if these are a candidate?
Another point I’ve been wondering is if there analogies or lessons that can be learnt from the Chiral Bag model of the nucleon?
I sometimes wonder if one was to use Wyttenbach’s (very interesting to me) SO(4) approach if different models and approaches at different scales can be resolved in a very elegant way. I guess time will tell.
Thanks and Best Regards
Stephen
Stephen,
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Congratulations for your monumental
http://www.researchnet/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Jorge:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Are you still optimist to start the presentastion of the permanent SSM Ecat SK leonardo, able to feed itself without external power sources ?
Anonymous:
I am, but I could ve wrong.
Tests and studies are progressing very well.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
there is a typo in yesterday’s exchange between you and I.
The exchange with Pekka was on 9/2, not 9/4.
My apologies for any confusion arising from this typo.
Buck
Buck:
Never mind, correction made,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Is still Carl-Oscar Gullstrom part of your theoretical research team ?
Jeff
Jeff:
Of course yes !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
1-Are you also continuing to replicate the processes published by your competitors ?
2-You do them yourself ?
3-Did you find some of them working enough to compete with your technology ?
Thanks if you can answer,
Matt
Matt:
1- yes
2- no, with exception of the replications made of my process. I have experts that do it for us, we do not have time presently. I’d take personally care of items should they be really interesting
3- not so far, but I know only the ones that have been published, I cannot know if there out is some “dark matter”…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
When will the Ecat for households enter the market ?
Will it be at a reasonable price, affordable for all ?
Martin Himpe
Martin Himpe:
Surely it will, but I am not able to give a date so far.
The price should be popular.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
dr Rossi,
will the body of the Ecat SK Leonardo the same we saw in
http://www.ecatskdemo.com?
Willie:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven Karels,
My experience with nuclear energy production goes back as far as 1954,when I was employed by a company called Inland Testing Corp. My first task was to chemically analyze fuel rods used in the swimming pool reactor at the U of Michigan to assure compliance with required Uranium content. At this company I was put in charge of the worlds largest Co60 testing facility where we tested the effects of gamma radiation on a variety of products. Among these products were hydraulic systems to be used on the proposed Aircorp nuclear bomber. After our gamma ray tests, we transported the systems to the reactor at the U of Michigan to test for possible neutron effects. This first view of a working reactor was an experience I will never forget.
Here I was not 20 feet away from a working nuclear core submerged in 20 feet of water where I could see the fuel rods moving in and out as they adjusted the power output of the unit. Also viewable was the blue Cherenkov radiation. Our only protection was a radiation monitor worn by all personnel. The only fear stated by the university personnel was that their funding would not be adequate to continue their research for improving the operation and safety of nuclear devices.
Their predictions were mostly optimistic for the development of this source as the main generator of world power needs if enough funding was available for research into the required operation and safety methods. Of course that never occurred and most efforts were impeded by regulations imposed by agencies created by the ignorance of people in power. The Navy ignoring many of the restrictions, developed perhaps the best usable device for their ships and showed that relatively small and safe units were possible. This fact was completely ignored by the power industry that relied on fossil fuel for their power. One personal coincidence that amuses me is that one of my college friends went on to become a naval captain in charge of a nuclear submarine.
My point is that if we could have gotten around the ignorance and selfish interests of powerful groups, we would not be looking as intensely for another source of usable cheap power. Even now with enough effort nuclear power could supply all we need economically and safely. My 90 years of life has convinced me of this.
Dear Andrea,
I deeply appreciate your meaningful exchange with Pekka Janhunen on 9/2.
It paints a fuller picture if one recognizes the story of Bellerophon taming Pegasus, the white winged horse born of the blood of the beheaded Medusa and under the protection of Athena, goddess of war and wisdom.
Are you happy with your progress with Pegasus?
my best to you, your team, and your wife.
Buck
Buck:
Yes, I am.
Thank you for your kind sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I see from Rod Walton’s comment that nuclear power capacity continues to rise. A good carbon-free energy source if only the radioactive wastes was easier to deal with. Can you technology transmute or otherwise reduce the radioactive wastes?
Steven N. Karels:
We made experiments related to this issue in 2011 also in collaboration with Prof Sergio Focardi, but they have been unsuccessful.A good work on this field has been made by Dr Vitaly Uzikov and Dr Irina Uzikov ( see his article on the JoNP ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi.
the importance of your invention can be found also in this article on Times of India, the major newspaper of India:
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/seeing-the-invisible/solar-energy-badly-harms-the-environment-it-must-be-taxed-not-subsidised/
Saju Abraham:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is the most important paper I read in the last ten years.
Thank you for sharing that mine of information.
Max Ponzi:
I thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Your answer to Max is very funny !
Good joke to the trolls,
Cheers
Nick
On Power Engineering September 3 2019:
Global nuclear energy capacity rises for the sixth straight year
Rod Walton
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
This is a link to an interesting
video on the History of Physics.
https://youtu.be/–gfU6Np9mk
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea,
What are the white and black horse commenting to each other these days? Just curious…
regards, pekka
Pekka Janhunen:
Black Horse: we already got the electricity from the plasma!
White Horse: maybe, but attention, we do not yet have a premanent reliable self sustaining mode…
Black Horse: when a horse is as calm as you normally is buried
White Horse: when a horse is as frenzy as you normally buries himself with a broken leg
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Can you suggest a recent publication of nuclear physics worth to be read ?
Prof:
Yes, this:
“Ultradense protium (P0) and Deuterium (D0) and their relation to ordinary Rydberg matter: a review ”
by Leif Holmid and Sindre Zeiner-Gundersen, 2019 ( Physica Scripta 94-075005 ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Your answer to Max: Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha !!!
Jim:
He,he,he
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Why don’t you answer to the idiots that write nonsense comments against you in what you have dubbed “the house organ forum”?
Max
Max:
I do !
Now and again I get some fun answering by a nickname to the trolls that they are damn right ! And to give evidence of the fact that they are right, I write tremendous stupidities, to see what they answer and if they understand my comment is a joke, but…they always bite it ! They always answer to my comment that I am right and Rossi is a moron or something. It’s very funny, our Team made a lot of laughters and also it is a paradigmatic example of their poor scientific background ( if any ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
has unleashed an enormous wave of R&D ! That’s what ecplains the stunning, world record, number of full readings.
Rupert
Rupert:
I agree.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Are you safe from the hurricane Dorin ?
Alfonso
Alfonso:
The hurricane Dorin eskewed the Miami area, we have not been hit from it.
Thank you for your kind concern,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
I’m still here watching you. He he..
I’m curious. Is the current test in process being conducted where the previous test was done where the necessary equipment was available.
Warm regards to you and your team.
Dan C.
Dan C.:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@ Eric Ashworth
WHAT are You trying to say and do ???
@ Andrea: What Do You mean by “enough” ? Is there a limit at all ? If we want to save the world, there can be only one meaning to enough, and this means, literally EVERY person and company uses ONLY YOUR DEVICES.
Since this is not the case, NEITHER “enough” devices can have been produces, NOR “enough” customers are equipped with them.
So, how do You explain your “enough” ?
Steve_saves_the_climate:
With the fact that we are still in an R&D and pioneering phase.
Our Client are not yet massive because our product is not yet mature for a massive distribution.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, I feel most fortunate to be able to use your JONP to inform readers of my understanding as I perceive structure from a none academic view point. I say this from personal experience, being that the first question people ask me when this subject is brought up, is when and which university did you go to, well I never went to one. The next question is where did the information come from. My reply has always been ‘from the same place all information comes from before it is put into a book. What I have become aware of is that it is the source of the information that appears to be of importance as much as the information itself when in the presence of or communication with certain people and therefore, for me this subject has been a learning curve in more than one way. Am I going to relay past personal experiences?. No, it will serve no purpose whatsoever and this is not the time or place. I simply take this opportunity to express my thoughts and activities with regards structure and related subjects I consider, important to the understanding. Understanding of what you may ask. The understanding of structure which represents a unit of energy. Can this understanding be put to good use?. My own thoughts are yes, otherwise I would not consider sharing this information.
The only tools I have needed with regards theory is geometry and maths. There are only three symbols to a unit of energy :- square – circle – triangle or cube – sphere – pyramid. Basically two of the symbols are contradictory or you could say in competition. In the structural unit the cube represents the exterior which is the volume dimension i.e. the negative force of the exterior gravity from which structure comes into being. The pyramid represents the interior positive force of the interior gravity being the force of penetration that resides at the point, to be correct (not the central position, central position lies between point and periphery). The circle represents any position between the point and periphery being between the apex of the triangles and the square. Thereby the circle represents a value of a neutral, dependent upon its position between these two fixed potentials of force (the circle represents the mobile unit that travels over a distance from periphery to point in a given time and that has to transition in order to occupy each specific zone, each zone being a potential of neutrality. What you have is a structure comprised of three symbols two fixed being the positive and negative and one that represents any central position between the point and periphery i.e. a mobile dimension upon which a transitional neutral will travers from periphery to point. It is this varying neutral that experiences time as distance travelled between two locations. Negative location/beginning being of a volume dimension and positive location/end being of a size dimension. Both dimensions represent absolutes of the structure and both these dimensions operate within ‘what could be termed’ a none structured zone comprised of four paths of none structured material that forms helical trajectory loops of communication. This I do not believe is difficult to understand as a geometric pattern. What you have is a square containing four triangles and a circle containing a cross being the sides of the triangles which almost meet at the point position of the structure. Almost because it is empty being a value of gravity. This integral unit represents an overriding structure/plasm or the macro system comprised of systemic systems of independent life supporting structures within each pyramid.
Now I am going to develop this pattern into a more meaningful unit which will help explain its purpose. Only one of the four pyramids/triangles applies to a system of evolution because you cannot occupy more than one pyramid with regards the systemic system of evolution within the plasm. This you should be able to understand.
The structure can be viewed as a six sided cube with four side flats and two flats on either side that contains four pyramids and one sphere of an indeterminate size being a mobile dimension that navigates between periphery and point. The four flats are four gates of the four evolving neutrals. Within leading to the point via the centre comprised of six divisions within each pyramid (The top is no structure, the bottom is no structure, the first set of the base is fuzzy i.e. no structure. The path being binary is a helical trajectory comprised of none structure and of structure that requires four ninety degree turns i.e. orthogonal/perpendicular angles to navigate each division within/without each pyramid Thereby four gates, twenty four divisions, twenty four turns within each pyramid. Each four divisions represents a set between which is an interregnum/synapse and thereby the neutral that enters a set is considered the last being the last in line, the neutral that entered before is obviously the first being before the last and because there are six sets it can be realized that the last becomes first and the first becomes last as progression and development occurs within the cube i.e. from periphery to eventual point. This can be related to a negative, positive position or an age difference in development. Consequently, there has to be six positives and six negatives to a cube. Each 90 degree represents two potentials, thereby six flats/cube contain six negatives and six positives with the gravity value being the major positive that induces the penetrating factor i.e. not the major one that is at the point of the four pyramids but the minor one that is always at the centre of a pyramid upon the path of evolution (centre anywhere upon the path between the absolutes). The four neutrals between are of no consequence as they are only able to respond to that which appeals to them i.e. being of the negative potential or that of the positive potential. So what we have is one structure containing four zones/pyramids. Each zone contains time dimensions of a specific evolutionary system. Is it necessary to understand four zones?. Absolutely, if you wish to become technologically advanced. Is it necessary to become technologically advanced?. Absolutely because it is an absolute necessity when you understand the evolutionary pattern from creation to destruction. What this is referring to is planetary evolutions within the macro environment or micro cubes within the macro cube, which is the same as spheres within a sphere. This subject is about structure because structure represents energy. There are four divisions within each pyramid between two i.e. absolutes. The exterior division is unstructured, thereby three divisions/sets of structure within each pyramid, 3×4 thereby twelve gates because each set has a gate. Four pyramids North, South, East, West of the macro structure. Each gate is an entry into a dimension of density, think of a stone, thereby 12 stones, each of which has three densities, positive, neutral, negative of a structure being a charge which could be looked upon as solid, liquid, gas if referring to densities. To have a dimension of density requires a degree of gravity hence 3 gates to a pyramid not four and 12 gates all together. This is the macro unit of energy, Can it be projected into a mechanical construction that provides a unified field with a purpose?. Yes but not at the complex state of twelve stones when manipulating physical structure. i.e. not three in each pyramid but two which is all that is needed when manipulating air. Why two? because physical structure contains gravity of a size dimension whereas virtual particles contain gravity of a volume dimension. This subject is complex but not unable to be understood. My next information will be how to embody this understanding into a useful mechanical device. This will explain the static and mobile mechanics of energy interaction as it cycles through two dimensions of its four pyramids.
Regards, Eric Ashworth
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
If you can say:
1) How many companies are now customers for your commercialized E-Cat SK product?
2) Are there any companies currently working with you and the E-Cat on a Research basis– e.g., new products, new capabilities, …?
2b) If so, are there more than one?
Thanks,
WaltC
WaltC:
1- enough
2- yes
3- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Can you tell us how many Ecat SK have been manufactured so far?
I follow the work of your Team with great interest!
Best Regards,
Rafael Regis
Rafael Regis:
Thank you for your attention to the work of our Team.
It is premature, for now, to give these statistics.
I’d say: “…enough…”
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today on other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
There’s an article in the “Journal of Aeronautic & aerospace engineering vol 8 iss 2 no 216 “ That describes work on using a magnetohydrodynamic power cycle to convert heat energy from plasma into electricity. Theoretically up to 99% efficiency is claimed. The article can be found at –
https://brilliantlightpower.com/pdf/MHD_Paper_082719.pdf
It may be of interest to you.
All the best.
Kind Regards
Gab
Gberra:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Thank you for your monumental paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and for the corroborating video
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
I thing Long Range Particle Interactions is proper.
All the best for your revolutionary work.
Gabriele
Gabriele:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S.
Your comment is the N. 48 000 of this blog
Dear Andrea,
a new low energy plasma tech:
https://tech.nikkeibp.co.jp/dm/atclen/news_en/15mk/120702539/
maybe can help you,
plasma regards
Domenico Canino:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
In your opinion, it is more probable that one of the firms producing heat by your Ecat reveals it:
A) by the end of this year
B) by the end of next year
C) never
LC:
B
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
thank you for your compliment on the merits of my question yesterday.
If your response is to say that my intuition is pointed in the correct direction, then I have a clearer understanding of why you hold SSM as such a worthy goal, a goal of relatively greater importance than extraction of electricity. If my intuition is again pointing in the correct direction, then your attainment of SSM to a 5-6 Sigma level based upon a fuller understanding of your (2-5-10?) control parameters suggests that the door is opened wider for bringing deeper clarity to your Long-Range Particle Interaction paper. This Alpha configuration acts as a control point.
First, the door is opened for looking for new/additional control parameters capable of impacting your 5-6Sigma SSM. Further, intuition says that knowing and manipulating these (2-5-10?) control parameters, as well as any newly discovered factors, enables one to “map” the defined, and as yet possibly undefined energies/forces/conditions you described in your paper, weighing their relative importance to attaining/maintaining or improving the SSM mode. In addition, each control parameter may show a “greater alignment/affinity” for some of the energies/forces/conditions described in your paper, again helping to “map” the phenomena.
If my understanding is fair, then I wish your and your “best team in the world” all the best. Your path seems intelligent . . . 😉
Sincerely & respectfully,
Buck
Buck:
Intelligent insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I noticed that the readings of your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
are continuing to raise ( stunning numbers, it’s a world record ) proportionally to the hits on
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
This gives evidence of the fact that the importance of that paper is its coherence with the experiment, besides its theoretical value, that is very high.
Good luck for your test toward the permanent ssm: what a revolution !
JPR
JPR:
I agree.
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today on other posts,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea,
Thank you for sharing your impression of the current level of success for the extended testing. For me, a sigma of 2 is a great success. It suggests that you are about 2/3’s of the way towards “full control” of attaining & maintaining SSM, and/or possibly approaching somewhere near 69% of an expected limit.
I am trying to understand your approach. Strictly guessing, is intuition pointing in the right direction where you/your team are aiming for attaining and maintaining SSM as a first step, say to a level of 5-6 Sigma. Then, once SSM control is mastered, the R&D manipulation of the control parameters will begin with the goal of increasing the extraction of electricity while staying within the “box” defined by the different (2 – 5 – 10?) SSM control parameters? And, of course, all the while assessing the suitability and durability of the hardware encasing the SK Leonardo plasma?
Respectfully,
Buck
ps. Of course my best to you and your team
Buck:
Your insight is intelligent.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I trust you and your family will be safe when the hurricane comes. Will this affect your ongoing testing?
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for your kind concern.
The tests will not be affected.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Regarding the tests you are currently performing:
1. Are you generating electricity directly from the E-Cat?
2. If so, have you been able to charge a battery from the E-Cat yet?
3. Can you run the E-Cat from a battery (not the grid) yet?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- premature
3- should be
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
it gives me a great satisfaction knowing that you, with your limited means, have accomplished what no else in the planet has achievedwith unlimited funds and what you’re achieving is the greatest discovery ever !
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
Chuck Davis:
Thank you for your attention to the work of our team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andra Rossi
One question please, this year will you deliver your products to France ?
Warm Regards,
Toussaint François
Toussaint Francois:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi
This link on liquide plasma https://books.google.fr/books?id=icwdAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA242&lpg=PA242&dq=liquid+plasma+Nou.ra,shams&source=bl&ots=3N4zGCZGa0&sig=ACfU3U1hViirsuIlZJ18IWCaqSN0YIuIcQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi8lfy1r6jkAhUCqxoKHcXND-wQ6AEwAXoECAsQAQ#v=onepage&q=liquid%20plasma%20Nou.ra%2Cshams&f=false
Hi again.
Regarding the tests… Do You still measure using the sigma scale ?
If so, where on that scale Do You consider the testresults since the start of the current tests ?
Steve_saves_the_climate:
Two.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Thousands of years ago the Phoenician in the old town of Amrit used the Nou.ra,shams, an electro-plasma substance that appears like “liquid light”. to heal people and to make energy. Just for information…
Domenico Canino:
Wow!
Can you supply the source of this information ?
It looks historically inconsistent.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andea
From your reply to Karl-Henrik Malmkvist from August 2019 at 8:16 AM, it appears that the direct electricity production in SK Leonardo may be: far, far more than just making sure that enough electricity is generated to satisfy SSM.
If you succeed here, E-Cat becomes not just one energy revolution, but two, through the same product.
I hope you and your team succeed!
Sincerely: Svein Henrik
Svein henrik:
Thank you.
We are here working very, very hard to succeed.
I am optimist, but no cigar yet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Now it works, thanks. I believe that a very minor change to the references in the paper might have caused a momentary access problem for people not logged to ResearchGate.
Best regards -WM
William Mathias:
OK
Thank you for the intervention,
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Your Ecat can essentially be said to consist of 2 parts: A) a power supply and B) an energy generator.
You are the best judge of the functioning of these two components.
What satisfaction rating do you think it is NOW correct to assign to A) and B) on a scale of 1 to 10?
For years I have been following your R&D work with great interest and today I am more than satisfied with the results achieved.
God bless your efforts.
Warm regards
Gian
Gian:
Thank you for your attention to our work.
As a matter of fact, the Ecat SK Leonardo is conposed by hundreds of parts, due to the complexity of the control of the plasma and to many other factors. Globally, due to the good tests on course I am satisfies for the 80%, but one of my best collaborators repeats “Andrea, be humble”, so I am 51% satisfied.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Your paper on https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long-range_particle_interactions appears to be currently only available on a request basis.
Best Regards -WM
William Mathias:
Not true.
Just type the link you correctly wrote and you will read the paper. Just click on “Public File” under “Description and Figures”.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
As the current Ecat is operated remotely by internet access , but the new development of a ECAT with SSM mode is planned to be off grid, do you also hope to have this new development to be operated independently of a internet connection?
in my view this will be of a huge benefit for developing countries where no internet is available.
take care of your health
kind regards Arjen
Arjen:
Now we are working to get the permanent ssm. If we will succeed, we will think to the consequent issues.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Can you give us an update about the tests on the E-cat Leonardo?
Thanks.
Kind regards, Gerard
Gerard McEk:
We are proceeding very well and I am optimist about what is going on, but a lot of work remains to be done.
Thank you for your attention to the work of our team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Power Engineering August 27 2019:
The digital transformation of the power plantt: it’s a twin-twin situation
Rod Walton
Dear Andrea, Your reply to Lots Mileykowsky is a very good answer but it could also be said, who can understand has understood. This subject is highly technical and spectrums exist throughout nature, even with regards human development which provides for levels of varying intelligence/understanding. Anyway I thought I would put this forward even though it is not important to the technology. It is simply something that is unavoidable at this particular time but can if dwelt upon create a waste of time. Regards Eric Ashworth
Eric Ashworth:
Maybe you are not wrong at all,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Yes I realize it that after reading it this time round it some have already that its information rich , it is that but it’s also a lot to digest and understand. I need to put a side my pre concepts and really think about what that information is conveying and what it really means..it’s a very good paper for those well versed in the fields and concepts it is covering. I can see that you have put great amount of work into i orb in in study, understanding and how to present iit deserves respect.
Regarding the link to your paper in the initial response to me it says it’s to you paper but it actually it seems to go a different location on reseach gate than your paper
Best Regards
Stephen
Stephen:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Andrea Rossi.
I notice the link you included in your reply doesn’t go to the expected one although it’s interesting in its own way.
That said your paper which I have the link to is definitely worth a re read as my understanding starts to improve.
Always something new to learn with something like this.
I’m now thinking of light cones in ways I never thought of them before.
Thanks
Stephen
Stephen:
My paper responds to your questions, but it is difficult to read, you must read it carefully. A superficial reading of it is a loss of time.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi
In an earlier response to a question raised by Gerard you answered Yes to his question regarding the energy not being of nuclear and of e=mc2 origin. (I hope I got that right)
I wonder if I can ask a question to clarify that point (I hope they are not too naive)?
Is the amount of energy generated
1) accountable by changes in the overall binding energy per nucleon in the nucleus?
2) fully independent of the nucleus
3) is the conservation of energy etc accountable at atomic mass level or by some external aspect within the over all system.
On a separate point does all the generated energy pass through the resonance you mention or is that resonance an independent signature.
I hope those questions weren’t too far off track 😉
Best Regards good luck for success with the current testing .
Stephen
Stephen:
1- I do not think so
2- no, as explained on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330603654_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
3- the conservation energy is accountable for the system, as it has always to be
4- I think the resonance is fundamental
Warm Regards,
A.R.
The difference between an Ecat that does not need any external power source and an Ecat that needs an external power source is obvious.
Prof:
I agree,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Andrea,
Maybe this is premature, but is your aim to control the electrical and thermal outputs of the E-CatSK Leonardo independently of each other or will there always be a fixed ratio? I mean if you manage get x Watt electrical power do you think it is possible to decrease the thermal output and maintain the electrical output? Maybe your coming tests will answer that question?
Best Regards,
Karl-Henrik Malmqvist, Sweden
Karl-Henrik Malmqvist:
Yes, we should be able to make this balancing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Lotr Mileykowsky:
I think that who wants to understand has understood.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
one query wrote here by “Martin” about “why self-sustain is needed, if CoP=100” need slightly more sophisticated answer, than “do math”.
“Martin” is probably Martin Tůma – an author of smearing articles about E-Cat in magazine VTM (Science and Technics for Youths).
With Your eventual more precise answer, there is hope that youths in our country will have chance to read and know some real info about E-Cat.
Dr. Rossi,
If you do update your paper,
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions , I believe it could also be improved if you explicitly mention the Coulomb Barrier and how it does or does not apply to your situation.
I acknowledge that you address the issue implicitly through your references, but it would help to convey your theory if you address and reinforce the subject directly within your paper. And while the paper does talk about the Coulomb Force, it doesn’t talk about how “things” pass into and out of an atom’s nucleus and thus achieves nuclear transmutations.
For many readers the coulomb barrier is the “900 lb gorilla” in the room: clarity is hampered when there’s the appearance of ignoring its presence.
Just one person’s opinion based on his own experience reading (and re-reading) what is clearly a very important and fundamental paper.
WaltC
WaltC:
Thank you for your suggestion and your attention to our work.
As a matter of fact, the issue of the Coulombian force is talked about in par 1, 2 and 3 as per its relation to my technology, that is not related to cold fusion. To understand my paper is necessary forget the concept of cold fusion. The mechanism is totally different from a cold fusion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Steven N. Karels, Thank you for your response to my posting. I understand what you are saying and agree with your suggestion of paragraphs which in future I shall keep in mind. However, I cannot emphasize enough that I am not out to persuade anyone that I am right with the information that I present. The information is put forward for consideration of a subject that is far reaching and wide ranging. I realize Andrea’s technology is at issue and his quest for a self sustaining mode is now his main objective. The way I present is no doubt novel and difficult to understand but this is the nature of the subject. Should a person wish to correct me I am available or should they ask a question, I will answer it, if I can, if not I shall explain why. At the end of the day i.e. to finalize I will put forward by description two mechanisms. One that provides a unified field of circulating air constructed by an understanding of geometry i.e. theory relating to structure. The other is a mechanism relating to structure but that of magnetic fields. Both mechanisms require an adequate source of power from clean energy. This subject is not to be argued about, it is simply take it or leave it for the time being because the future is inevitable. Regards, Eric Ashworth
Your publication on Researchgate is still by far the most read on Researchgate. It is impressive.
Congratulations
Clay
Clay:
Thank you for your kind attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Do you foresee to update your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Brett:
Probably yes, after the end of the tests on course. The paragraphs 3,4,5 in particular and the references. Many things are in the making.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Will the SK Leonardo, if it will be born after the tests on course, have the same body shown in
http://www.ecatskdemo.com ?
Foster:
Externally yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Eric Ashworth,
Thank you for posting that you think my previous post on eCat SSM operation was correct. However, I could not follow nor understand the remainder of your post. Some suggestions from what I learned in Law School.
1. Break common ideas into paragraphs.
2. Use a format such as IRAC — Issue, Rule, Analysis and Conclusion. It makes for a more coherent argument.
You are free to post what you wish but, to be persuasive, your argument must be easily comprehended. Some thoughts.
Dear Andrea and Steven N. Karels,
The question of systemic as opposed to system is with regards an overview of a situation which as you are aware of, is with regards parts of a greater whole. I mentioned this fact with regards entropy which is why you can’t get all the power out of the atom. Time with regards distance is the (could say problem) but it is not, due to the present situation being of a specific position. People unaware of the systemic nature of the system are unaware of the Absolutes of the system i.e. the system within which we live and have our being. Because this subject is nebulous I feel it necessary to approach it from the bottom up as opposed to half way. When a person solves a problem based upon his own reasoning and solves it, not by theoretical understanding but by an embodiment of the understanding. The understanding cannot be disputed with regards what is comprehended as true or false. it simply represents an embodied belief which is what every part of physical nature is comprised of. Embodiment only requires one aspect of the two aspects because we live in a binary system of entanglement i.e. interacting aspects. This single aspect is called gravity. The other aspect is what gravity has its effect on which provides effects due to gravity having its varying degrees of magnitude. Thereby effects produced as apposed to a single effect and consequently a systemic system of evolution as apposed to that of a system. This is with regards to material substance being structures within a spectrum, the spectrum being that of gravitational fields that dictates density which equates as a value of positivity or negativity of a structure (yes density). This understanding should be related to a volume and size relationship both within structure i.e. of the micro and the macro and between structures. Is gravity a manufactured aspect?. The mechanism behind gravity is annihilation of the values of potentials (not annihilation of a structure) thereby out of destruction of the potentials comes creation, first the gravity value, then its effect upon the outer structures/particles. A.J. Wheeler and Richard Feynman did provide a clue when they mentioned orthogonal/perpendicular planes with regards charge potentials. Thereby every structure must contain a value of gravity that is within a value of gravity. It is the outer value of gravity that is overcome by the inner gravity of the field within which the structure resides. The structure navigates a journey from creation to destruction within a gravitational spectrum over a distance involving time. As it navigates through the spectrum of its creator force, it undergoes transitions of its two dimensions i.e. an increase in its potentials. Obviously at one end of the spectrum is an absolute of volume and at the other an absolute of size. Maybe the dinosaurs were a natural stage in the evolution of an environment of a volume dimension. I believe that to enter the subject of energy without what I consider a basic understanding, a person can become hypnotized and spellbound by the myriad of permutations of these two basic interactions that create a structure that represents a value of energy. Every structure can be looked upon as a battery of electrical energy. As an analogy it appears that the study of energy with regards its particles can be likened to the studying of knitted objects produced by a woman without being aware of the raw material and the mechanisms. I have come to realize that fixed ideas are probably the most difficult tasks to overcome. As is well known the atom is a misnomer with regards its Greek meaning but does it matter?. Not one iota because things are what they are not what they are called. I do intend to continue with this method of presentation so that a pattern can become apparent because without joining the dots the subject is unable to be understood. Steven N. Karels, with regards your remarks your posting August 22nd at 7.21 am is direct and deals with the issues required to achieve a self sustaining eCat reactor but these issues involve a far greater understanding regarding planetary integration (Pi) but your posting is correct. Regards, Eric Ashworth
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Andrea,
My compliments on your recent progression in the ECat SK Leonardo electric theory and developments.
Suggestion: With the term ‘Long Range Interaction of Elementary Particle’ will result in an unpronounceable acronym ‘LRIEP’ or ‘LRIOEP’. Perhaps, if the words do not change its meaning, the term ‘Long-Range Exchange of Atomic Particles’ could deliver a more pronounceable ‘LEAP’ acronym and imply a monumental advancement of nuclear physics.
With much respect,
Brokeeper
Brokeeper:
He,he,he…thank you for the suggestion!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
It is interesting to note that finally, the hot fusion and you, pursue the same goal: to get a self-sustained reaction.
ITER will have to obtain the same reaction that occurs inside the sun: from a certain threshold of physical conditions, all plasma heating devices can be turned off, the reaction is maintained itself (obviously with neutrons production).
First plasma planned by the end of 2025
About your paper, how do you explain that a long-range interaction as you describe it has not yet been detected in labs?
Regards,
Michel
Michel:
When you go in the wood looking for mushrooms you must know how they look like, otherwise you pass through thousand of them without seeing any.
For example, if you think that mushrooms look like dollars or euro, you find dollars and euro, but when you cook them they have a bad taste.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Now you have come to the insight that Cold Fusion nor LENR are the cause of energy production in the E-Cat SK, I and many others wonder where the energy comes from.
Does it mean that you believe the energy, generated in the E-Cat SK, is not from nuclear origin where ‘E=mc’ plays the main role?
I really look forward to your answer.
May your final tests confirm your ideas about the Rossi effect!
Kind regards, Gerard
Gerard McEk:
Yes.
Thank you for your kind attention to our work.
In this very moment we are starting the final series of tests in the USA.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Why is necessary SSM if you have COP > 50 or 100 ?
Best Regards,
Martin
Martin:
Do the maths.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
In a recent post, you used the word “sistemic”. I believe you want the word “systemic”.
adjective: systemic
1. relating to a system, especially as opposed to a particular part.
“the disease is localized rather than systemic”
2. Physiology denoting the part of the circulatory system concerned with the transportation of oxygen to and carbon dioxide from the body in general, especially as distinct from the pulmonary part concerned with the transportation of oxygen from and carbon dioxide to the lungs.
Steven N. Karels:
1 corresponds to our context, mutatis mutandis.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Thx. Mr. Rossi.
Look, You really should update that paper.
Because CNTRL-F did not even find the word “potential” in it.
Therefore it is quite hard to get, what You are explaining in this blog while comparing it to the paper.
Steve_saves_the_climate:
The paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is not easy to read, but I can assure you that for persons that have the necessary bases to understand what I wrote, it is perfectly clear and coherent with what I said.
Note that it never cites the definitions cold-fusion or LENR. This is not a case, this is a precise choice.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
For example the results of Dr. Alexander Parkhomov and colleagues, who consider them to be LENR (or Cold Nuclear Transmutations as these reactions are often named in the Russian circles).
More generally speaking, I was curious knowing if your latest thinking of what happens inside your E-Cat reactors could be applicable to what LENR researchers believe to be observing, whether real or imagined.
I hope this clarifies -WM
William Mathias:
I have a great respect for the work of Dr Alexander Parkomov.
This does not change what I have said.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
The acronym ‘LENR’ is, of course, usually intended to be an abbreviation for the expression: ‘Low Energy Nuclear Reactions’. Of those four words, “low energy” is intended to signify simply a temperature far below millions of degrees; while the word “reactions” does not seem controversial; so, only the word “nuclear” seems to be up for discussion.
So, it seems the Ecats would qualify as LENR if the reactions do indeed involve the nucleus. While the material in your recent Researchgate paper is far beyond my familiarity with physics, your use of the term “elementary particles” suggests the nucleus is involved.
But perhaps you would like to make the point that your reaction is a very specific and different type of reaction in the nucleus. Different, that is, from any of the other reactions people have sometimes claimed to have achieved that involve the nucleus. Indeed your reaction appears to be an entirely novel phenomenon, never previously even imagined.
Is this perhaps a realistic appraisal of the semantics?
Rodney.
Rodney Nicholson:
besides semantic interpretations, the issue is that what I am learning from experiments is totally strange to what is intended by Cold Fusion and LENR.
We are seeing long range particle interactions. Our work and our most recent theoretical discoveries, after our experiments, have presently nothing in common with all has been done and is being done in the Cold Fusion-LENR community.
That’s all and is a fact.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
1. Today you clearly confirm that your effect is not at all related to LENR or Cold Fusion.
Does that mean that the description of the Rossi effect at ecat.com has to be modified?
2. If not as “LENR Energy”, how do you now prefer to name the energy released from Ecat SK
plasma?
Maybe “Clean Plasma Energy” as proposed at https://lenr-energy.info?
Regards
Sven B
Sven B:
1- yes and we will
2- The name of the energy is heat or electricity, it does not change, but obviously you mean the name of the processinvolved: I think Long Range Elementary Particle Interactions is more proper, but the problem is not semantic, it is sistemic.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Rossi,
you say you don’t have “currently” anything to do with LENR and that the current machines based on the exploitation of a plasma depend on the “potentials of the atom” as shown in the article on researchgate.net. But the many experiments inspired by F&P and the absorption of H on a metal, in particular the Lugano experiment have highlighted isotopic and elements transmutations beyond any doubt and therefore LERN exists and happens even if normally with a non-exceptional COP and probably with reliability problems.
You are now on another plasma-based technology that gives better results. What we do not know is whether isotopic and of elements transmutations also occur in these plasmas.
We would appreciate if you can clarify and specify it.
Fox:
LENR is a so wide definition, that it is not a definition and it makes a lot of con-fusion. Since this term is commonly used to connotate “cold fusion”, I prefer to say we are out of it, also to be honest with the recent development of our R&D. Isotopic changes do not imply fusion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Do you nevertheless think that your work and theory can explain results in the LENR field?
Best regards -WM
William Mathias:
Which results ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Mr. Rossi.
You said finally, that You’ve got to the point, where You decided, that there is no fusion in Your device.
In stead You assume, that it has to do with the atom’s potential.
Can You explain in detail ?
Best regards
Steve
Steve_saves_the_climate:
I started to explainthe bases of the on-thre-making theory in my paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
We are performing our last period of tests before the final definition of what we made. I hope in extremely important results. At that point we also will publish a more defined theoretical frame.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Wpuld you consider your effect a form of “cold fusion”?
Giovanni
Giovanni:
No. I arrived to think that cold fusion does not exist.
At this point of our theoretical and technological development, after 20 years of hard work, we think that cold fusion does not exist. I am sorry, but I feel us lightyears far from the LENR community, to which we, actually, never belonged. My effect depends on atom’s potentials that have nothing to do with cold fusion or LENR. This, by the way, is clearly put in evidence in my paper here:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_anf_long_range_particle_interactions.
One thing I must admit, though: my work initiated inspired by the idea of cold fusion launched by F&P and my former works started from that theory, but after tens of thousands of experiments and twenty years of study I changed idea. Like Christopher Columbus, who thought he had reached India, but eventually it has been discovered it was America.
We reached important results and much more important we are close to reach with a technology that with cold fusion has nothing to do. As a matter of fact, we do not have any fusion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.